AOL outages and service status in Fair Haven, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Fair Haven, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Fair Haven, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Fair Haven, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Fair Haven and nearby locations:

• 
  Geno Talarico (@genot32) reported 9 minutes ago from Wanamassa, New Jersey

  @antwanstaley I didn’t .... but I remember them. I could never get to play them because I would always run outta time on my AOL CDs.... lol

• 
  kyle (@kgeich) reported 13 minutes ago from Tinton Falls, New Jersey

  Imagine growing up without AOL Instant Messenger. Life would’ve been terrible.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rusty (@isrustydotnet) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BuzzPatterson Yea, we tried doing a iMitchcall through AOL but it was too slow.

• 
  f_marzotto (@f_marzotto) reported 3 minutes ago

  $BSP is a masterpiece. Just not of innovation. Working in Big Tech, you get used to seeing what actual scale and innovation look like. So watching Italy crown Bending Spoons as its great tech champion - a team that buys beloved, declining brands like AOL, Evernote, WeTransfer, and Meetup to "revive" them - has been fascinating. Their $18 billion IPO is largely deserved: they are exceptional operators. They make neglected software fast and profitable. The machine works. But there are two things you can do to a fading product. You can make it modern and profitable again - or you can make it win again, attracting new people who genuinely love it. Bending Spoons does the first brilliantly. The second, almost never. Their own SEC prospectus reveals the trick. Organic growth was 13% last year, and just 6% last quarter. Net revenue retention is 94%, meaning each cohort of users is worth less a year later, even after aggressive price hikes. This isn't a base being won back; it's a base leaking quietly, taxed harder on the way out. This is exactly why comparing them to Big Tech is so revealing. Picture $META putting WhatsApp or Instagram behind a paywall tomorrow. There would be a global uproar. Meta has the most locked-in audience on Earth, yet they refuse to charge them. Why? Because they are still chasing growth. Bending Spoons charges its captive audiences precisely because it has no growth left to protect. They execute the exact playbook that would make Meta a supervillain, but on smaller apps with weaker exits - and we call it genius. The reviled villain treats its users better than the celebrated innovator. A true maker earns its price by building something genuinely better; you pay because you want to stay. Bending Spoons didn't build these products; braver people did. They buy them when they are loved and hard to quit, and turn them into extraction machines. They are professional converters of makers into takers. Charging people because they want to stay makes everyone richer. Charging them because they can't leave just moves money from users to shareholders. One is a gain for the world. The other is a transfer. And every switch they flip is one more bill on people already drowning in subscriptions, asked to pay again for what they once had free. Of course, the business works. Rent extraction is the safest business on earth: low risk, fast payback, nothing to invent. But compare that to actual innovation. Whatever you think of Elon Musk, he took real risk on things that didn't exist yet: Tesla forced open the EV industry, SpaceX made rockets reusable, and each time the rest of the world had to follow. He earned his success by growing the pie; Bending Spoons pours the same ingenuity into nag screens and cancellation mazes, carving up a pie someone else baked. Let's not call a toll booth a cathedral. Celebrate rent-collection as innovation, and we teach our best makers to optimize the past instead of building the future.

• 
  👁️⃤merican Mafia (@FortunaDiem) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BasedTorba Remember when Zuck made Zader Fader for AOL and it still sucks *** to this day

• 
  Bernd (@BwieAktien) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Forbes Peak New Economy: AOL bought Time Warner in 2000/01 in an all-share deal, with a purchase price of about $147bn on the books, often announced as ~$165bn. In 2002, AOL Time Warner then took a $54.2bn goodwill impairment, followed by another $45.5bn write-down. Now AOL is back in the public-market story as part of Bending Spoons’ >$18bn IPO! $BSP

• 
  Robert (@towdow3) reported 7 minutes ago

  @TimoTweetss this tweet shows that you ARE that guy. I have an AOL email and i one point i hadn't checked it for ten years. I had no problem checking it. TEN YEARS.

• 
  Kevin Hood (@itskevinhood) reported 7 minutes ago

  Shotty product mockups: • Old AOL email addresses. • People who never open emails. • Filtering bad leads manually after opt-in. Professional product mockups: • Custom domains. • Reputable brands in adjacent markets • People that actually open and read your emails. The difference is night and day.

• 
  Nicole (@statuescrumbled) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BrianEntin Happy to have you in Loudoun. We were also told these awful buildings would only be up for ten years. The reason the built them here was bc of the original AOL infrastructure which never made any sense to me and is now clearly a lie. They have RUINED our beautiful county.

• 
  Etheraider (@etheraider) reported 8 minutes ago

  Every trendy chain is basically trying to sell you their flavor of AOL, some training wheel, curated version of the internet. When in reality, the real unlock is the unbridled, uncensored, open-access network. $ETH

• 
  Levity (@LevityODonnell) reported 9 minutes ago

  None of them have ever rung me. I got to the MSN point, adding people. I never got to the AOL AIM level they were all on. No one would share the lists with me.

• 
  Novel Ninja | Catholic Geek (@thenovelninja) reported 10 minutes ago

  Mel misses the point, perhaps even by sincere error. It's not nostalgia for limited programs. I'm sure there are some people who want to go back to AOL, but that's not the point. It's that we have come to recognize that being parked in front of a screen for most of the day is bad for even an adult, much less a child. So many of us are nostalgic for a day when we weren't online all the time. Personally, I'm also old enough to remember when I was called socially deficient for reading all the time, just because my books were more interesting than my peers. I was in eighth grade before I found friends who liked even some of what I enjoyed. Being online isn't automatically bad, but if you don't exercise self-control you'll find it controls you. That's being terminally online -- when it defines you, more than anything else.