1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Little Silver
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Little Silver, New Jersey

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Little Silver, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Little Silver, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Little Silver, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Little Silver, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Little Silver and nearby locations:

  • kgeich
    kyle (@kgeich) reported from Tinton Falls, New Jersey

    Imagine growing up without AOL Instant Messenger. Life would’ve been terrible.

  • genot32
    Geno Talarico (@genot32) reported from Wanamassa, New Jersey

    @antwanstaley I didn’t .... but I remember them. I could never get to play them because I would always run outta time on my AOL CDs.... lol

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • 0xFinish
    Finish 🏁 (@0xFinish) reported

    EVERY BUBBLE HAD ONE FINAL TRADE THIS IS OURS The most overvalued market in 100 years and retail is still buying every dip This pattern has preceded every major crash in modern history not most of them, all of them Dot-com: the internet was real Nasdaq lost 78% Housing: real estate was real $8 trillion disappeared AI: the technology is real just like the others were The technology being real has never once stopped the bubble from bursting SpaceX just entered at $2.35 trillion with 95% of shares still locked and a wall of insider supply hitting the market on a fixed schedule starting in August Every bubble in history had one final moment the trade so exciting it pulled the last of the retail money in right before the whole structure collapsed Dot-com had AOL Housing had mortgage-backed securities AI has SpaceX Same ending. Different props. Turn notifications on - if you're not following yet, you'll understand why that was a mistake later

  • noahintel
    Noah by SAN (@noahintel) reported

    ALERT: Iran reported casualties and infrastructure damage from US military strikes, according to Euronews and AOL; the report was last updated at 00:27 UTC July 10.

  • thezorch
    Michael TheZorch Haney aka The Professor (@thezorch) reported

    @ColonelFalcon Back in the day, people thought AOL was too big to fail. Then they did, and very quickly. Their massive campus complex was leveled to build a data center that serviced the many startups that sprang up around them in Silicon Valley. Sony is not too big to fail either.

  • Novafan78910
    Novafan (@Novafan78910) reported

    @mar70854f @nemywtf @itskwasi You have to get an undergraduate degree before you go for a PHD retard Zuck and gates were mega geniuses going to harvard. Zuck had a job offer from AOL in high school. Much different from 99.9% of you retards who say “well an immaterial amount of rich people don’t have degrees”

  • SpesVires
    Spes & Vires (@SpesVires) reported

    @JimmyNoSense @_The_Prophet__ If you really do believe that significant portions of the world's population are w/o internet access, then, my internet friend, I can't help you other than wishing you have fun with your newly found AOL CD

  • towdow3
    Robert (@towdow3) reported

    @TimoTweetss this tweet shows that you ARE that guy. I have an AOL email and i one point i hadn't checked it for ten years. I had no problem checking it. TEN YEARS.

  • GrandpaBigDog
    Neal (@GrandpaBigDog) reported

    @Andie00471 @Soaringeagle45 19. Never had an AOL address.

  • JohnSmithdqlo
    John Smith (@JohnSmithdqlo) reported

    @cmsinvests MSFT can never fail right? Just like AOL and Yahoo. Guaranteed to outperform the index in 40 years.

  • JamesWinebren14
    James Winebrenner (@JamesWinebren14) reported

    I worked from home no doubt. Started with fax machines. We actually use high resolution fac machines to transfer camera ready artwork. Long before AOL dial up. F.I.N.S. works with all software or no computers at all like morse code after a first strike during the Cold War my SOS.

  • Paul__Walsh
    Paul Walsh (@Paul__Walsh) reported

    I hate digging into my credentials, but in the context of online child safety and child exploitation, they matter because governments and child safety lobbyists are railroading everyone with personal opinions based on dangerous ideology. Being a parent doesn't qualify me to say what actually works, what' doesn't, and what the cost is in relation to privacy. I've spent more years building standards, API services, filtering technologies, and content moderation techniques than just about anyone. Very few experts sit at the intersection of internet infrastructure, telecommunications, app security, child exploitation detection technology, and content classification and filtering; I'm one of them. People with my background are being entirely ignored by policymakers for a reason. We know what's technically possible, what's not, and the catastrophic costs of getting it wrong. Security isn't just at odds with convenience, it's almost always fundamentally at odds with privacy. I built my first website 30 years ago, and was introduced to online child safety and content moderation that same year, in 1996, when I joined AOL. At the time, I helped launch new technologies and ran global testing for the launch of AIM, AOL's instant messenger and the internet's first consumer instant messaging app. I co-founded the W3C standard for content labelling and web classification, and in 2004, co-invented the concept of classifying internet accounts (labelling them by risk, identity, or purpose). I foresaw that the future of online trust and safety required filtering accounts, not just websites and web pages. Features like Twitter's verified checkmark and LinkedIn's verification are implementations of this very idea - they just got it wrong. I've run operational calls with The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the US Department of Justice on the automation of monitoring, detection and reporting, and I signed an MOU with NCMEC to help combat exploitation through browser software and mobile security services that my teams built for online child safety. The keyword tracking list Thorn shared with partners came from me over 15 years ago, inherited from a colleague who built it for CEOP while seconded from AOL. I also advised IWF. My team built the first child safety API service for mobile device OEMs, an even deeper kind of device-level scanning than Chat Control. Samsung was set to embed it in every device they sold, and Apple planned to put it in the settings of every iPhone, iPad, and Mac, around 1.3 billion devices between them. So I know what this kind of technology can and can't do on a phone, and I know what it costs in terms of end user privacy. Both deals drifted away because we were too early, one of the hardest things about being a tech founder. Years later, Samsung and Apple built parental controls so good that a parent can now block any app or website on a child's phone in a couple of minutes. When I was interviewed on BBC Newsnight 14 years ago, it was to demonstrate how bad parental controls were. Now I'm telling you they're as good as I could possibly hope for. Most leading security companies license my patents for in-app security, covering more than 50 categories of classification, including anti-phishing, malware, child abuse, pornography, and disinformation. Chat Control 2.0 mandates client-side scanning of links for apps like Signal. Luckily of Signal, they require my permission or face infringing in my patents. I'm *extremely* unlikely (read that as never) to license my patents for the purpose of government mandated censorship. I have declined governments in the past and I will do it again in the future.