AOL outages and service status in Lake View, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Lake View, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lake View, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Lake View, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Lake View and nearby locations:

• 
  Kevin Merkel (@kmerkel04) reported 19 minutes ago from Highland-on-the-Lake, New York

  @IDcrisisdesign @Lutoslava I got one because I never had any AOL account.

• 
  KKing (@KevPKing) reported 23 minutes ago from Orchard Park, New York

  @Chris_Quartly @peacockTV +1 The quality is also AOL Dial-up level. It's atrociously bad compared to ESPN+

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  deputydog357 (@deputydogblitzn) reported 9 minutes ago

  @FOX13News Technology and computers have always led to fraud, the dark web has been around since the AOL days, unfortunately the govt keeps adding more technology to everything for the surveillance state, they will never stop it

• 
  Sandy Kory (@sandykory) reported 11 minutes ago

  I haven’t been buying the "SaaSpocalypse," but Q1’s nosediving SaaS valuations gave me pause. After a week in SF last month sampling the AI zeitgeist, I have a better feel for where the software sector is heading. It’s the SaaS-to-inference transition, and it’s good. My long-standing view has been that AI is a net positive for the software industry. It radically raises the ceiling for what software products can do. It should dramatically expand the market opportunity for software, just like the on-prem-to-cloud transition did back in the day. Yet many have been freaking out. After all, haven’t SaaS switching costs come down dramatically in SaaS, threatening one of the pillars of the business model? Yes, there’s no doubt that the “cement around the ankles” of legacy SaaS has weakened. At the same time, most legacy SaaS companies have barely scratched the surface of AI innovation while maintaining their historically high retention. This is how it played out in the last major transition: on-prem-to-cloud. Many legacy players (pathetically) ignored cloud innovation for 5-10 years (or longer) and still kept their customers. It turns out that technology is stickier than most in the tech industry believe. Take a look at Bending Spoons, which IPO’d off the back of buying crappy legacy products and jacking up prices because users didn’t want to give up their AOL email or Evernote notes. Tech industry people are not like this. They tend to be part of the very small minority of early adopters. Most people aren’t like this. Neither are most organizations. Legacy software isn’t going to disappear. But if pre-AI software companies don’t embrace AI innovation, their customers will be much less forgiving than on-prem customers 10-20 years ago. AI capabilities are too potent and obviously beneficial. What does embracing AI innovation look like? It means layering intelligent actions into all software. Historically, great software has helped users follow the right workflow. Now, great software must do the workflow by triggering agents to take actions. In other words, inference. The great news for everyone is that this opens the door to consumption-based pricing models that can scale exponentially. For legacy players and startups alike, delivering amazing AI-powered, agentic features is the way to get on the vertical-growth train. Remarkably, the door is still open for legacy players. Intercom’s 3.6b exit to Salesforce is a great example. Of course, new pricing models mean new margin structures. Just as SaaS had lower gross margins than legacy on-prem, expect consumption-priced inference to have lower gross margins. This is OK! We’ve already seen massive wins for inference-selling startups with negative gross margins, like Cursor. Legacy SaaS companies need to find religion on this. Dropping margins is never easy. Lock up the finance team if you have to. The priority is delivering AI-powered value for customers. Everything else is just details.

• 
  J (@janjanrione) reported 15 minutes ago

  @colorfulkulio @ryrytoofye2 Oh you slow for real . Did Aniya tell you that ? Because all I see is her saying she likes everything about kc . Kc didn’t go for aol because plot twist he didn’t want to .she went for Gabriel and kissed him,

• 
  Matchalover (@hauntedhomesinc) reported 16 minutes ago

  @prisyum Don't even make me start to try to remember my AOL login

• 
  Bernd (@BwieAktien) reported 17 minutes ago

  Peak New Economy: AOL bought Time Warner in 2000/01 in an all-share deal, with a purchase price of about $147bn on the books, often announced as ~$165bn. In 2002, AOL Time Warner then took a $54.2bn goodwill impairment, followed by another $45.5bn write-down. Now AOL is back in the public-market story as part of Bending Spoons’ >$18bn IPO! $BSP

• 
  Andrew Carles (@andrew_carles) reported 20 minutes ago

  @hetmehtaa The issue is that email itself is not inherently secure. While the practitioner's email system may be encrypted and compliant, there is no guarantee that a patient's personal AOL, Yahoo, or Gmail account has the same level of security. Once information leaves the provider's secure environment and is delivered to an unsecured personal email account, the risk of unauthorized access increases significantly.

• 
  Ghost of Jimmy Legan (@GhostofJLegan) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JebraFaushay Mergers have a nasty habit of not working out. I am thinking of Time Warner's disastrous marriage to AOL, but there are a myriad of examples.

• 
  HLoR+Shada (@HLoRShada) reported 23 minutes ago

  Genuine Question: How long were you on a social media app before you realized you didn't HAVE to respond/defend yourself to every idiot who rudely attacked you for having an opinion? Because I just got that epiphany and I was there for AOL dialup. 😶

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 30 minutes ago

  $ASTS 🚀 The biggest opportunity in space isn’t rockets. It’s the infrastructure being built around them. Think back to the early days of the internet. Most investors focused on companies people could see—Yahoo, AOL, Google. But behind every website was an invisible network of fiber optic cables, servers, networking equipment and data centers. Without that infrastructure, there would be no internet. Space is beginning to follow the same blueprint. Imagine a brand-new city. Nobody builds shopping malls first. Nobody opens restaurants before roads exist. First come the highways. Then electricity. Water pipes. Communication networks. Only after the foundation is complete do businesses move in. Space works the same way. Satellites are becoming the roads and communication networks above Earth. Every successful launch adds another piece of infrastructure that governments and businesses may depend on for the next 10-15 years. 🚀 Rocket Lab $RKLB builds the transportation system. Think of it like a construction company building highways before cars can drive on them. Without reliable launches, nothing else reaches orbit. Now, by acquiring Iridium, Rocket Lab isn’t just building the highway—it also owns part of the communication network already operating on it, creating recurring revenue beyond launches. 📡 AST SpaceMobile $ASTS is solving one of the biggest communication problems on Earth. Imagine you’re hiking on a mountain, sailing across the Pacific, or driving through the Australian Outback. Normally your phone becomes useless. AST wants your existing smartphone to connect directly to satellites without changing your phone or installing new equipment. If successful, billions of phones instantly become part of a global satellite network. 🌍 Planet Labs $PL doesn’t sell rockets or internet. It sells information. Imagine a farmer managing 100,000 acres. Instead of driving across every field, satellites tell him exactly where crops need water or fertilizer. Insurance companies can estimate hurricane damage within hours instead of weeks. Governments monitor borders. Military agencies track activity. The product isn’t the satellite. The product is the data. That’s recurring revenue. The exciting part isn’t today’s launches. It’s what those satellites unlock tomorrow. AI. Defense. Autonomous vehicles. Global internet. Weather forecasting. Navigation. Financial markets. Precision agriculture. Entire industries that don’t even exist yet. Twenty years ago, cloud computing looked expensive and unnecessary. Today almost every business runs on it. Tomorrow, satellites may quietly become just as essential. Sometimes the greatest investment isn’t the company everyone notices. It’s the company building the invisible infrastructure that everyone else eventually depends on. 🚀

• 
  jill vejnoska (@ajcjillv) reported 31 minutes ago

  @unreMARKLEble Too bad AOL (what? They still exist?) got her age wrong by about a decade!