AOL outages and service status in Poughkeepsie, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Poughkeepsie, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Poughkeepsie, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Poughkeepsie, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Poughkeepsie and nearby locations:

• 
  Dan T.'s Inferno (@dantobias) reported 44 minutes ago from Wappingers Falls, New York

  @downdetector @ScottGreenfield AOL has been having issues since 1993.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Foaly Pub (@FoalyReviews) reported 3 minutes ago

  someone get this guys Website posted or at grok for me... I'm getting this thing.... **** ADS that **** getting worse then the ad spam with all those ******* banner ad's those of us that remember the late 90's-00's and AOL days constant pop-out ad's if you went to the wrong sites

• 
  Eric (@EricsElectrons) reported 3 minutes ago

  The crazy part about having dial-up internet was we had to add an extra ~20 minutes to our time of arrival because we had to turn on the computer, open the AOL app, sign in, and then wait for that long dial-up tone before going to the MapQuest site to write down directions.

• 
  RLDThree (@RLDThree) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation PSN is always going down. Worst online service since AOL. Anyway, it's an excuse for the physical media moaners to start up.

• 
  CathyNotToday2 🌿 (@Cathy2NotToday) reported 6 minutes ago

  Uh oh … this is even BEFORE his massive Data Center hauls 💰 CHARACTER should matter to voters , not what letter is next to their name The Trades Byron Donalds Didn't Want You to See Byron Donalds spent years on television lecturing Congress about insider trading. Then the record caught up with him. Between 2022 and 2023, Donalds and his spouse made over 100 stock trades valued up to $1.6 million without filing the periodic transaction reports required by the STOCK Act. Campaign Legal CenterCampaign Legal Center The number, precisely, was at least 108 trades in dozens of companies, ranging in total value from $108,108 to $1,620,000. Campaign Legal Center HE DIDN'T DISCLOSE THEM IN REAL TIME. The trades only surfaced in annual filings submitted in August 2023 and August 2024 — more than a year after most of the transactions occurred. That delay isn't a technicality. The STOCK Act exists so voters can watch for conflicts of interest as they happen, not a year later. And the timing here raises real questions. Donalds sits on the House Financial Services Committee, and some of his trades were in companies that committee oversees, including Elevance Health and JPMorgan Chase. In September 2024, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a formal ethics complaint asking the Office of Congressional Ethics to investigate. CLC argued that because Donalds understood the STOCK Act's requirements better than most lawmakers, there's reason to believe the omissions weren't accidental. AOL The irony is hard to miss. This is a man who once appeared on television demanding sanctions against members of Congress who violate the STOCK Act. Florida Bulldog He said the House "has to get real." Now he's the case study. As of mid-2026, Donalds has said publicly that he doesn't personally trade securities but uses a broker with trading authority, and that he supports banning direct trading by members while allowing third-party financial professionals to trade on their behalf. (PolitiFact That's a defense worth weighing on its merits. It doesn't erase the 108 undisclosed trades or the year-long gap in reporting. Voters can decide what that pattern says about judgment — but they deserve to know it happened before they decide who leads the state next. 🎇We have a real chance to shift our leadership expectations. Stop settling for party and vote AGENDA and CHARACTER Vote @davidjollyfl @GwenGraham Note: this uses information and reporting from the Campaign Legal Center, Florida Bulldog, and PolitiFact —

• 
  G_I_DAVE (@G_I_DAVE) reported 7 minutes ago

  Never had an AOL, but I still have my Hotmail email, so I'm gunna call it a full punch card.

• 
  Jeff Bohren (@JeffBohren) reported 9 minutes ago

  Since I have been casting aspersions on "Agile as Practiced in Nearly Every Project with a Certified Scrum Master", I should tell you about some projects I was on that worked. One on the most interesting ones was during my Network Management product development phase. I was hired by ARINC to work on software for the Iridium project. Shortly thereafter, one of the directors came up with an idea for a commercial product. He wanted a no code drag and drop UI to create a GUI to show and control SNMP values. We went to two Networld-Interop shows a year, one in Las Vegas and one in Atlanta. He wanted a new minor release for each trade show. The product owner would give the dev team a list of prioritized features. The five developers would meet and decide what we could do by the next release and worked in order of priority. That's it. Simple and effective. The code was written in C/C++ and was written to run on Windows, SunOS, HP-UX, and AIX. We used a OSS GUI library called InterViews. It integrated with HP OpenView and IBM NetView. From a business perspective, the project was a failure. We made sales, but not enough. Eventually the project was terminated an we were all laid off. That is when I was hire by AOL, but that is another story.

• 
  𝓼𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓵𝓭𝓸𝓷 (@Rdynasty0019) reported 9 minutes ago

  @cctvaccident Dial up beeping .. aol connecting noise... totally unnecessary... wtf

• 
  Chris Farrell (@chrispfarrell) reported 10 minutes ago

  I think OpenAI and Anthropic might be the CompuServe and AOL of the AI era. Does anyone actually think Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Oracle, IBM, X/Twitter, and all of the other big tech companies will just allow these 2 badly run startups to capture the AI market? OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a moat or sustainable competitive advantage. To win they have to not only develop a moat but penetrate some of the most fortified moats. Model quality isn't a moat. Kimi, Grok, Deepseek proved that. Inference will become a commodity utility that requires massive CapEx that neither can finance. Interface is where the moat is the weakest. OpenAI and Anthropic do not own the apps or the OS. The OS and apps are owned by parties who view OpenAI or Anthropic as threats, and they can complicate things very easily. As if that is not grim enough, AI sovereignty will become an issue. Consumers will want their iCloud data to stay in iCloud, their OneDrive data to stay in OneDrive, etc. Enterprise customers will want AI from their cloud providers to reduce egress and for performance + IP reasons. It is honestly hard to imagine a world where OpenAI and Anthropic survive as they are. They will either morph into companies with entirely different value offerings or die like Compuserve and AOL.

• 
  Kumalovi📺 (@Bear_lovi) reported 11 minutes ago

  Because I know my Facebook password but why ******** would you give a AOL account and a lookout account when I don’t know the password to them

• 
  jeff (@VulcanMoron) reported 11 minutes ago

  @bobo103nyc I remember seeing this as a kid back in the AOL days and thinking “surely this is the worst thing I’ll ever see on the internet”