AOL outages and service status in Streetsboro, Ohio

Problems in the last 24 hours in Streetsboro, Ohio

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Streetsboro, Ohio and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Streetsboro, Ohio

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Kent.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Kent	E-mail	19 days ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Heisenburgir (@heisenburgirrs) reported 2 minutes ago

  People prefer to pay flat rates than metered. In today's age, you can give an agent monthly budget (flat rate) and not have to worry about how many micropayments it makes for products/services. Excerpt from "Case Against Micropayments": "What was the biggest complaint of AOL users? Not the widely mocked and irritating blue bar that appeared when members downloaded information. Not the frequent unsolicited junk e-mail. Not dropped connections. Their overwhelming gripe: the ticking clock. Users didn’t want to pay by the hour anymore. ... Case had heard from one AOL member who insisted that she was being cheated by AOL’s hourly rate pricing. When he checked her average monthly usage, he found that she would be paying AOL more under the flat-rate price of $19.95. When Case informed the user of that fact, her reaction was immediate. ‘I don’t care,’ she told an incredulous Case. ’I am being cheated by you.’"

• 
  Jeff H Reynolds - Outspoken Texas Conservative (@JeffHReynolds) reported 3 minutes ago

  Yahoo has really followed the demise of Excite, Netscape and AOL. Terribly sad. Very poor management.

• 
  Paul Walsh (@Paul__Walsh) reported 8 minutes ago

  I hate digging into my credentials, but in the context of online child safety and child exploitation, they matter because governments and child safety lobbyists are railroading everyone with personal opinions based on dangerous ideology. Being a parent doesn't qualify me to say what actually works, what' doesn't, and what the cost is in relation to privacy. I've spent more years building standards, API services, filtering technologies, and content moderation techniques than just about anyone. Very few experts sit at the intersection of internet infrastructure, telecommunications, app security, child exploitation detection technology, and content classification and filtering; I'm one of them. People with my background are being entirely ignored by policymakers for a reason. We know what's technically possible, what's not, and the catastrophic costs of getting it wrong. Security isn't just at odds with convenience, it's almost always fundamentally at odds with privacy. I built my first website 30 years ago, and was introduced to online child safety and content moderation that same year, in 1996, when I joined AOL. At the time, I helped launch new technologies and ran global testing for the launch of AIM, AOL's instant messenger and the internet's first consumer instant messaging app. I co-founded the W3C standard for content labelling and web classification, and in 2004, co-invented the concept of classifying internet accounts (labelling them by risk, identity, or purpose). I foresaw that the future of online trust and safety required filtering accounts, not just websites and web pages. Features like Twitter's verified checkmark and LinkedIn's verification are implementations of this very idea - they just got it wrong. I've run operational calls with The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the US Department of Justice on the automation of monitoring, detection and reporting, and I signed an MOU with NCMEC to help combat exploitation through browser software and mobile security services that my teams built for online child safety. The keyword tracking list Thorn shared with partners came from me over 15 years ago, inherited from a colleague who built it for CEOP while seconded from AOL. I also advised IWF. My team built the first child safety API service for mobile device OEMs, an even deeper kind of device-level scanning than Chat Control. Samsung was set to embed it in every device they sold, and Apple planned to put it in the settings of every iPhone, iPad, and Mac, around 1.3 billion devices between them. So I know what this kind of technology can and can't do on a phone, and I know what it costs in terms of end user privacy. Both deals drifted away because we were too early, one of the hardest things about being a tech founder. Years later, Samsung and Apple built parental controls so good that a parent can now block any app or website on a child's phone in a couple of minutes. When I was interviewed on BBC Newsnight 14 years ago, it was to demonstrate how bad parental controls were. Now I'm telling you they're as good as I could possibly hope for. Most leading security companies license my patents for in-app security, covering more than 50 categories of classification, including anti-phishing, malware, child abuse, pornography, and disinformation. Chat Control 2.0 mandates client-side scanning of links for apps like Signal. Luckily of Signal, they require my permission or face infringing in my patents. I'm *extremely* unlikely (read that as never) to license my patents for the purpose of government mandated censorship. I have declined governments in the past and I will do it again in the future.

• 
  Nadine Travis (@travis_nadine) reported 17 minutes ago

  @keithapearson I’ve had an AOL account for over 30 years and never had any issues.

• 
  Crosby Tatum (@crosbyt123) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Kev1743 @TheOVW5 I’ll never forget it. I took a flyer on a ticket. I had an AOL Instant Messenger communicator back in the day with a sprint pcs phone. Drove down from Boston in my beat up 89 Toyota Camry. Best night of my life.

• 
  Vernon Foster (@VernonFost13133) reported 23 minutes ago

  @GaryCollin37052 his tariff policy. His tariffs amount to the largest U.S. tax increase as a share of GDP since 1993 (Tax Foundation) , roughly $1,500 per household in 2026 (Tax Foundation) . Trade: the Supreme Court ruled he couldn't impose tariffs under emergency powers (aol) , but he's kept

• 
  Finish 🏁 (@0xFinish) reported 24 minutes ago

  EVERY BUBBLE HAD ONE FINAL TRADE THIS IS OURS The most overvalued market in 100 years and retail is still buying every dip This pattern has preceded every major crash in modern history not most of them, all of them Dot-com: the internet was real Nasdaq lost 78% Housing: real estate was real $8 trillion disappeared AI: the technology is real just like the others were The technology being real has never once stopped the bubble from bursting SpaceX just entered at $2.35 trillion with 95% of shares still locked and a wall of insider supply hitting the market on a fixed schedule starting in August Every bubble in history had one final moment the trade so exciting it pulled the last of the retail money in right before the whole structure collapsed Dot-com had AOL Housing had mortgage-backed securities AI has SpaceX Same ending. Different props. Turn notifications on - if you're not following yet, you'll understand why that was a mistake later

• 
  Wong Joon Ian (@joonian) reported 24 minutes ago

  AOL Mail is the outlier here. Wtf??

• 
  Levity (@LevityODonnell) reported 28 minutes ago

  None of them have ever rung me. I got to the MSN point, adding people. I never got to the AOL AIM level they were all on. No one would share the lists with me.

• 
  Greg Manuel (He/Him: GIFT SHOP IN BIO!) (@WriterComicNYer) reported 29 minutes ago

  @HappyNaClO1 "Guaranteed money" didn't almost ruin wrestling. Lack of variety almost did when AOL/Time Warner decided they were disinterested in pro wrestling. Brooks either doesn't know what he's talking about or he's being wilfully full of ****.