AOL outages and service status in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Vicki Mallory (@vicki_mal1) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 I was a mainframe systems programmer, I did not 'surf the web' back in the day, terribly insecure (worse now). I used IBMLink my entire career. We used arapnet, other early networks to research data at Berkley, UCLA, JPL. Mainframes are secure, always have been. When PC's, the web for everyone, AOL came out, we laughed and stayed with secure connections. We had email on the mainframe, profs (under VM) for word processing, long before the public knew what those things were. There is no security out in this non-ethernet world now! Https means nothing. Data mining is to be expected and reading terms and conditions should have intelligent people running from certain apps. I have never had a FB presence, nor will I. I constantly ask anyone around me, family, churches, friends, who pressure me for one app or another, "did you read their terms and conditions?" I know, Thrilla, you wanted cute answers. I'm supplying truth. X is my only social media and my husband had to talk me into it. Now, I'm a posting, replying, liking, following fool! But I won't download any other.

• 
  FOOHAHA (@ArtieLeecock) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MrDavidAngelo Like trying too cancel AOL back in the day

• 
  Swats24 (@swats24) reported 7 minutes ago

  @TheGrillGeek I never had AOL but a different version of online messenger. Never owned a waterbed but have experienced it. I never owned a record player but seen it in action. Does that give me 19 or brings down my score to 16? Also, I still use a checkbook 👵

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 7 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

• 
  Nameless G (@RealTmDaddy) reported 9 minutes ago

  So on the advice from some on here, I have decided to get a "side piece". A quick search on AOL. com for codeword "maid services" and a woman will come to your house and do all the things your woman isn't there to do. For an extra fee, you can even get a *********. My wife has mentioned getting a "maid service" before, but I thought she had experimented with that in college & outgrew it. I've hired this side piece to come do her thing while I am at the airport picking my wife up. I hope my wife doesnt have some intuition that I cheated (on the house cleaning)

• 
  Arran 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@altxslayer) reported 9 minutes ago

  I would never join BlueSky, it would be much much better to put a second sim card in my phone and have my followers have this new phone number. I was tech-social before AOL, MSN and BBM and it was just fine.

• 
  el friki de la parrilla (@TheGrillGeek) reported 13 minutes ago

  19 for me. Never had an AOL address. Do I get a bonus point because I still use a fax machine?

• 
  Hector Podcast (@hector_podcast) reported 16 minutes ago

  @TTrimoreau AOL chat rooms ..: like wtf was that…

• 
  Lazarus (@Lazarus_Capital) reported 16 minutes ago

  @stocktrader989 stock i responded to your tweet "The current debt, interest expense, colo fees and no chance to make profits are reasons not to invest in $CRWV and responded with: "They’ve pioneered the way for neoclouds to get financing with Iran literally copying their DDTL structure, are bringing down their weighted cost of debt, improving margins, and focusing on the higher return business (cloud vs Colo). Their debt is a function of levering up to improve their returns. Their financing ability is actually so good that they’re giving up prepayments since that would weigh down their returns. They’re playing chess while $IREN is figuring out how checkers work" Either you dont understand what im saying or deliberately trying to twist what im saying. If theyre the pioneer in financing, they will be definition (very likely) have more debt compared to "peers", also, I stated they pioneered the way for them to get financing. Im not sure why youre repeatedly trying to paint it as my bull thesis rests on them being first. No. That was a stab at Iran since they literally copied their financing structure. Setting up that if you argue against CRWV's financing, youre basically saying your darling was is following their stupidity. Up to you if you want to make that argument. "Backward looking showing massive improvement- WRONG" I literally said its backward looking in response to you looking at their recent current state financials when theyre going through a grow phase. Literally triple digit YoY rev growth, not to mention ARR and rev backlog. Q1 revs of $2b against a $100B rev backlog. Where do you think the valuation is coming from? Whats happening to their compute deals? How can you model out how much they will earn? By looking at: "Revenue Backlog, RPU & financing- doesn’t hold water". With these names you need to be looking at how theyre executing, what direction theyre going, their rate of growth, margin direction, backlog, etc. IREN for example: missing their own cloud ARR targets, GPU rental prices weakening against a bullish backdrop, ARR growth with no regards to margin, margin compression and return deterioration, lots of power sitting doing nothing while peers have sold out. NBIS for example you did something similar by showing the last 2 Qs that theyre losing money. Yes, theyre building, investment cycle, they will have negative cash flows, look beyond that. I really try to engage and help others learn, and I love to test my thesis against others, sometimes with a little sarcasm and trash talking. I addressed your debt concerns and pointed you to where the value will come from. I dont like addressing someone's concerns and they brush it off like i didnt respond, instead choosing to focus on something I didnt even say like you did here "Pioneers ofter don’t win. Examples 1. Internet- AOL/ Yahoo 2. IPhones- Blackberry 3. BTC mining- Mara $CRWV is slightly improving but still a failed company" I especially dont like when people twist my words, or worse, accuse me of "changing your argument to try to meet your objective".

• 
  Ricky "The Dragon" Rubinowitz 🇮🇱🇺🇸 (@JimmyChonga454) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Rorothats70s @D4Pats12 @uscfan981 Austin wasn't the reason why WCW ended It was Money Laundering AOL Time Warner execs who charged WCW 10 times the standard on production costs on everything with affiliated & linked companies They didn't want wrestling on their network. It was a choice If TNA can be around for this long & lose more money than any other promotion in history, then you can clearly see that's a choice also.