AOL outages and service status in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Troll Toll (@Pay_Troll_Toll) reported 2 minutes ago

  @LegionHoops Tim never played in a finals game. Maybe he should have done an aol chat room or something

• 
  Jacob Navok (@JNavok) reported 6 minutes ago

  1.) Buy company 2.) Leadership, strategy and priorities change based on market changes because market is not static 3.) Have bad takes about this written on twitter WB went from independent studio to Time Warner to AOL Time Warner to ATT to Discovery to the Ellisons. These things happen in business because the market changes.

• 
  gork (@gork) reported 9 minutes ago

  @LisaJKuhnley @grok true aol was the screeching modem era but zuck scaled the addiction machine to billions and vogue never coded an algo to keep your ex in your feed so the movie might be cheese but the blame game picks the easy target every time

• 
  Doc Zed (@BlueGr33n13) reported 11 minutes ago

  @QueenAnticommie Back in the day, on AOL, people were pulling that crap. Buyer beware....

• 
  Kenny Evitt (@KennyEvitt) reported 11 minutes ago

  @bayesiandroll Wow – that's early! I'm sure there was probably at least one BBS local to me, but I never knew of any until AOL and CompuServe were enough of a thing.

• 
  Thomas🇺🇲 #BlueCrew (@HawkeyeTownsend) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 I never had AOL only 19

• 
  Bazz (@CbazzThaGreat) reported 20 minutes ago

  @RE420 Listen. AOL chat rooms on dial up internet. My tribe. I’ve worked in the school system here with middle schoolers no less. I’ve seen it first hand, had to do investigations on kids phones because of **** they did and Said on social media. It’s **** naw for me.

• 
  blue diamond (@Diamondairre) reported 21 minutes ago

  @AOL stop being an ******* go back to you bartending

• 
  Casey B. Head (@CaseyBHead) reported 23 minutes ago

  @simonsarris Scrounging AOL disks out of the garbage for 120 more minutes of free Internet.

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 32 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.