AOL outages and service status in Nanty Glo, Pennsylvania

Problems in the last 24 hours in Nanty Glo, Pennsylvania

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Nanty Glo, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 4 minutes ago

  But AOL knew a threat was approaching. Broadband internet was gaining momentum. The problem? AOL’s business model was built for the old internet. The slow, dial-up world. To compete with broadband, AOL thought it needed something it didn’t yet have: World-class content. A merger with Time Warner would give AOL access to some of the most valuable media properties in the world. Together, they believed they could dominate the future of the internet.

• 
  Kathleen Lenkeit voted for Hillary, Joe, & Kamala (@KathleenLenkeit) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Sheldon_305 19 - never on AOL

• 
  Ken Murphy (@Murphs51) reported 11 minutes ago

  @pinktastic615 AOL...heard some horrible things bout them after all these years! Mum used to write letters, and send photos to family, but most never bothered, so she finally just stopped! Now, I only keep in touch with family/friends back home, and they always reciprocate!

• 
  Strategic Ambiguity (@ToshCooey) reported 11 minutes ago

  @hecubian_devil We should have never allowed AOL onto it.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 12 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 13 minutes ago

  AOL had spent years building the perfect internet company for the dial-up era. But the world moved on from it Consumers discovered that broadband was faster, and free to access ...and unlike AOL, it didn’t tie up the telephone lines Suddenly, paying $20/month for AOL's internet access and curated content made less sense when broadband offered a faster, more limitless web. AOL's subscriber base fell from 26.7 million at its peak to roughly 10 million by 2007. This was its second major revenue stream And it was down 62%. How could this company take Time Warner into the future they hoped for?

• 
  𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚎 (@manipulate) reported 13 minutes ago

  a lot of you have never been punted off of aol at 3am and it shows.

• 
  1stRoundBust (@FirstRdBust) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18 for sure, Aunt had a waterbed. I tried it, it was terrible, and I never used an AOL address. I was a yahoo guy. Still have it. I did, however, use those cds that gave you internet time.

• 
  Thomas Olenik (@TomOlenik) reported 20 minutes ago

  @signorina37H 56k was blazing fast. I was an AOL customer beefier they went public with a 14.4k modem in a 486-66 machine and a whopping 8 MB RAM.

• 
  john (@johndillen77) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL email