AOL outages and service status in Crestline, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in Crestline, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Crestline, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Andrew Benson (@AndrewBenson) reported 6 minutes ago

  Airtable sold for a tenth of its peak. The founders kept the AI business. Bending Spoons announced today it's buying Airtable, all cash. The headline number hides three better stories. The deal: - Enterprise value: $1.285 billion - Equity value: ~$2.25 billion, but only because Airtable is sitting on ~$965M of net cash - Read that again: nearly half the purchase price is Airtable's own unspent money being handed back to shareholders - Peak valuation: $11.7B, December 2021 Series F. The business just cleared at roughly 89% below that - ARR: ~$480M, growing 20%. That's ~2.7x revenue. SpaceX paid 15x for Cursor six weeks ago The waterfall, per a widely shared model built on public terms (directional, assumes vanilla 1x prefs): - Everyone from Series C onward took par. Coatue, Thrive, Greenoaks, XN wrote checks at $1.1B, $2.6B, $5.8B, and $11.7B posts and got 1.0x of money back - CRV: ~21x on the 2015 Series A, ~6x on the B - Caffeinated Capital: ~37x on the A1 - Freestyle and Felix Shpilman at the 2013 seed: ~55x - ~$960M left for converting holders. The three founders, assuming ~15% held, split about $144M. Call it $50M each after 13 years - Same lesson as always: the last four rounds funded the exit for the first three Now the buried lede, from the SEC filing: - Before signing, Airtable ran a reorganization that transferred the entire "Hyperagent" business line out of the company into a separate entity, Hyperagent Inc - Hyperagent is the AI agent orchestration platform Airtable unveiled in early 2026, spin up teams of autonomous agents across your business tools - Bending Spoons is buying the database, the workflows, the 500K orgs, the 80% of the Fortune 100, and the $480M of recurring revenue - The seller is keeping the agents On Hyperagent's performance: there are no disclosed numbers. It launched roughly six months ago. No ARR, no customer counts, nothing public. What we know is that it was worth carving out of a billion-dollar deal, which is its own kind of disclosure. On whether the founders stay: nobody has said explicitly. Howie Liu's statement talks about "building the AI-native platform of the future," which reads either way on purpose. But follow the structure, not the quotes. The founders' holding company now owns Hyperagent outright, free of the legacy business. One newsletter's blunt read: Liu keeps the AI project without having to be the one who does the layoffs. The Italians do that part. And they will. Bending Spoons' playbook is public record: buy at a discount, cut deep, raise prices on customers too embedded to leave, run it for cash. Evernote, WeTransfer, Vimeo, AOL in January, Eventbrite in March. Airtable is the first deal since its July Nasdaq listing at $18.4B, and the first paid for with public-market currency. The frame: a decacorn built over 13 years just sold its core for less than the cash on its own balance sheet plus a modest premium, while the founders walked out the back door with the AI upside in a clean-room entity. The 2021 vintage investors got their money back and nothing else. The seed got 55x. And the most honest sentence in the whole transaction is a highlighted paragraph in a 6-K that nobody reads. Every exit this cycle tells you where the value is. This one says: the workflows are worth 2.7x revenue. The agents are worth keeping.

• 
  🐾Seiso Silv3rfox🐾 (@SeisoSilv3rfox) reported 9 minutes ago

  @ringsidenews_ I accuse @THEVinceRusso of damaging WCW with terrible storytelling and helping AOL time warner put it out of business intentionally for good....but ok

• 
  Maclo (@Maclo0701) reported 11 minutes ago

  @nowellstradamus @munric @EliteClubS0B Agreed they didn’t capitalize on knight and they’re missing out on a generational heel with Logan Paul. I stopped watching long ago but I can’t help but notice the similarities today with tko/wwe and aol time warner/wcw. It’s not good.

• 
  TOMMEE (@TeePal_) reported 11 minutes ago

  @VikesTrophyCase @amandalorian_ Damn girl u got an AOL AIM username?

• 
  Wanderer_91 (@WhoCares50567) reported 15 minutes ago

  @KellyPo96074228 @ZelenskyyUa Aol Ukrainian weapons come from the US stupid

• 
  Ramp Monsters (@RampMonsters) reported 17 minutes ago

  @HurricaneStiz I’m old and washed now. Around 2000 on AOL college football chat I was dominating the nerds so bad. 2001 was insane. So many stars in NFL. It was a scrolling cascading chat. Twitter was too. First tweets you texted a phone number then waited for your tweet to scroll by.

• 
  Mayank Agrawal (@mayankagrawal) reported 17 minutes ago

  Should we need to pay for email? In 2006, AOL and Yahoo announced priority delivery for senders willing to pay somewhere around a penny per message, with the promise that those messages would bypass the spam filter. The diagnosis behind it was correct. Email often breaks because sending is free, and when volume costs nothing, volume becomes the strategy (hello AI outbound!). Everything built afterward (filters, blocklists, sender reputation scores) is an attempt to patch a problem that is fundamentally about economics, and not about technology. Today, the same dynamic plays out on a much larger surface. AI agents can complete forms, take surveys, open accounts, and browse sites at a scale that would have been unimaginable for a spam operation twenty years ago, and most of that activity still registers in company dashboards as ordinary human demand. What I find most encouraging about Proof of Human is that this doesn't require the previous tradeoff. There's no toll, no puzzle, and nothing for a genuine visitor to notice or solve, because verification runs continuously in the background across the whole session rather than at a single checkpoint. When a decision does get made, there's a record behind it that a team can actually inspect, rather than an opaque score they're asked to trust. The email industry spent two decades learning that you can't tax your way to trust, and that authentication works better than obstruction. That lesson is worth carrying into whatever comes next.

• 
  Chris Buehler Sr (@BuehlerSr36868) reported 19 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 19 never used aol

• 
  Amy Alkon (@amyalkon) reported 21 minutes ago

  .@Ask_Spectrum is worse than AOL dial up—by far. Some manager gave me his number so I could call him if things got bad again. No reply. I need to spend my time trying to save my life from the massive malpractice by Kaiser. My energy is just crushed every day. I struggle to write even a few lines. Dealing with Spectrum again and again and again and it never been fixed is energy outlay I cannot afford.

• 
  William Parker (@wmprkr) reported 21 minutes ago

  @0xpwnie I think I was in 5th grade. Having internet in your house was still a rare thing and it was dial-up if it was. America Online. Everyone I knew used AOL discs as coasters for their Coca-Cola or whatever they drank. First computer was a Macintosh Performa 475. The webs speed was garbage back then, but we didn't have anything to compare it to. Social media wasn't a thing, it was forums and IRC. But man every single website was an amazing journey into a different realm. They called it the Summer that never ended, and boy lemme tell ya if you were there at that time, you'd give up all this fast web **** for a stroll down memory lane in a heartbeat.