AOL outages and service status in Dana Point, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in Dana Point, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Dana Point, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Dana Point, California

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: San Clemente.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
San Clemente	E-mail	2 months ago
San Clemente	Total Blackout	5 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Dana Point, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Dana Point and nearby locations:

• 
  JustSayinWhat'sOnMyMind (@JustSay74310747) reported 25 minutes ago from Mission Viejo, California

  @lawindsor All from Yahoo or AOL accounts. That speaks volumes. Hang in there.

• 
  HarveyISinger (@UVharvey) reported 31 minutes ago from Laguna Niguel, California

  @shandershow @AOL My wife Damn it. Been trying to switch her for years now

• 
  Giorgio (but just call me “George”) (@Giorgio_Sel) reported 40 minutes ago from Mission Viejo, California

  I’m going to be the last person to cancel Netflix, aren’t I? Just stubbornly holding on like the creature of habit that I am, the same way I do with my AOL account.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Don Jester (@don_jester) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 out of 20, I never had an AOL E-mail.

• 
  Joe Schwarten (@joeschwarten) reported 8 minutes ago

  Had our yearly apartment inspection. 2 Guys comes in does their thing. Looks at my monitor, "Damn dude, that thing is old, you run AOL on it?" Other guy, "you even old enough to remember AOL?" YG, "Yeah, I was born in 1997." Me: "Dude, that monitor is as old as you are!"

• 
  C (@T00tbeer) reported 13 minutes ago

  @WayneGunter8 @FrankenDjo Hahahaha oh ****. I forgot about AIM and AOL.

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 16 minutes ago

  AOL had spent years building the perfect internet company for the dial-up era. But the world moved on from it Consumers discovered that broadband was faster, and free to access ...and unlike AOL, it didn’t tie up the telephone lines Suddenly, paying $20/month for AOL's internet access and curated content made less sense when broadband offered a faster, more limitless web. AOL's subscriber base fell from 26.7 million at its peak to roughly 10 million by 2007. This was its second major revenue stream And it was down 62%. How could this company take Time Warner into the future they hoped for?

• 
  $XRPARMY (@JoshMcKinney18) reported 17 minutes ago

  @XRPee3 Adoptions just like AOL in 1998. The rails flipped. The masses showed up. What adoption is actually lining up right now? May 19 EO dropped with 90 / 120 / 180-day clocks. Regulators reviewing, Fed access report, then real steps to integrate. July 15: DTCC already ran live production tokenized trades. Not a sandbox. Real assets. 30–40 firms. $114T infrastructure. October: Full DTCC Tokenization Service launch. The remaining scale starts moving onto the new rails. November 15: Banking system goes ISO 20022. Unstructured payments get rejected. The old plumbing gets retired. This is the shift. Not a rumor. Not a “soon.” The dates are on the calendar.

• 
  Pascal Arlotta (@PascalArlotta) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh I never had an AOL account....19 out of 20

• 
  Currer Ellis (@ActonBell) reported 20 minutes ago

  @DerrickEvans4WV Can we just go back to AOL and dial up internet? Do we really need everything connected to everything…? I don’t think so. Let’s cancel this AI stuff.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 22 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Margaret Hudock (@nursehudock) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL Address.

• 
  sprint (@sspriint) reported 26 minutes ago

  In June 2000 a room of shareholders raised their hands and approved the worst deal in corporate history. The price tag was $120,000,000,000. When the deal was announced five months earlier it was worth about $165,000,000,000. Nobody stopped the vote. The currency was melting while they counted the hands, and the vote went through anyway. AOL was the buyer. A dial-up company with 23,000,000 subscribers paying monthly for modem access. Time Warner was the target. Cable systems, film studios, magazines, record labels, actual assets producing actual cash. The internet company bought the media empire with stock. Paper bought property. Steve Case knew what his paper was worth. Gerald Levin took it anyway. Watch the men on the steps afterwards. Nobody is arguing. Nobody in that footage looks like they just lost anything. Two years later the combined company wrote down about $99,000,000,000 in a single year. That number is larger than the annual output of most countries. By 2009 the two halves were separated again, and the pieces were worth a fraction of what they carried in. Every analyst covering the deal called it visionary. The vote took minutes. The unwind took nine years.