AOL outages and service status in Glendale, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in Glendale, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Glendale, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Glendale, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Glendale and nearby locations:

• 
  Coco (@cocoburbank) reported 23 minutes ago from City of Burbank, California

  @nayemonique @716Transplant Probably not it was so so bad lolll my aol scree name was xfilesam lollll

• 
  Jeremiah (@lebontempkid) reported 49 minutes ago from Burbank, California

  I'm so glad Twitter did not exist in my youth, the AOL chat rooms were bad enough

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alex Goldman (@AGoldmund) reported 5 minutes ago

  I’m reading Kara Swisher’s book about AOL which came out in 1999, and the tone of the book is like “this is the biggest company in the world! Nothing will take them down!”

• 
  GuiDaFunkyMan (@GuiDaFunkyMan) reported 5 minutes ago

  @ArcadeHorizons @virtualmage17 No immersion issue for me in the 80s, just 2 different atmospheres and that's it. In my opinion, lots of players hate AoL either because of a group effect (especially when it comes to Y-gen players and beyond) or because they didn't get its basic gameplay mechanics.

• 
  The Watcher On The Web (@WatcherontheWeb) reported 6 minutes ago

  Oh... Just in case it hasn't sunk in yet AI being able to code as well as it does means that software as a product or service is DEAD AS A DOOR-NAIL It will probably stop twitching in about 4-5 years for most people, but expect some companies to hold on by charging subscription services until 25 years after they have become irreverent... See AOL for examples

• 
  Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reported 7 minutes ago

  Claude v Harvey: My candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain this to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL?

• 
  Ryan Clark (@ryan_theprofit) reported 16 minutes ago

  My dad replied to news about my girlfriend with a green check mark. Honestly, appropriate. Our generation only writes well over text because we had to get good at it to date. AOL Instant Messenger, then years of practice with the stakes turned all the way up. His generation never needed the skill, so they never built it. The thumbs up isn't him being short with you. It's the whole sentence.

• 
  Mark Blaydes (@mblaydes1) reported 16 minutes ago

  @brockpierson I would login to AOL than go make dinner. By the time I came back the home page may have uploaded

• 
  Deeby🇺🇸 (@deebyman) reported 17 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Who ******** uses Mapquest still, they must use AOL also

• 
  AlexB (@tb_can) reported 18 minutes ago

  I was a senior in highschool and was talking to a girl a year younger than me. One time she spent the night and I turned my computer on and hacked the company her dad owned. I found her dad's signature in the payroll files and pointed it out to her. You could tell she was uneasy about it but fascinated at the same time. By the time I graduated I had received three letters from AOL asking me not to hack their ****.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 19 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 20 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L