1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Jurupa Valley
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Jurupa Valley, California

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Jurupa Valley, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Jurupa Valley, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Jurupa Valley, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Jurupa Valley, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Jurupa Valley and nearby locations:

  • mclazyj
    Joseph Haygood (@mclazyj) reported from Riverside, California

    @Tentaskyr @FoppinArts I could never make a change. I have used mclazyj going back to before I was married. It was my original AOL handle in 1995

  • findem_ds
    Dennis Stillman (@findem_ds) reported from Riverside, California

    @atlasshrugs2018 @AOL Plus this has been substantiated and reported by Left media in the NY Times & Washington Post. There are many articles on mail in voter fraud and to do this nationality is a complete debacle. This shouldn't be a contentious issue which shows you how desperate the Dems are.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • kalddan
    بو صالح (@kalddan) reported

    @Brian27843245 @luireigns AOL & Time Warner killed it since one of the suits after the merger was official decided that the network didn’t need wrestling and pull the plug on WCW

  • kurkosdr
    kurkosdr (@kurkosdr) reported

    @heyraven_io @WildComputers How much does the creation of a single tiny hat cost you in USD? How many of your users are paying for the service? You are the equivalent of AOL giving dial-up minutes at a loss in the name of "growth" or non-viable dot-coms burning tons of VC capital in the name of "growth".

  • Jebornik
    Jebornik 🇺🇸 ✝️ (@Jebornik) reported

    @disagreebutter Never had an aol address

  • rhiyddun
    Rhiyddun (@rhiyddun) reported

    @qaggnews @ColonelTowner @MarkEDeschaine True, back then the community was a lot smaller and better connected in a way, it was just us computer geeks, after all, just getting connected to the internet was difficult until Aol and Bix. I helped bring cable modems and digital set top boxes to the public but that wasn't until mid 90s. Before then, a fast connection was a 44.1Mb T3 at work, or a blazing 128kb from home, you could with some trouble get a T1... A fast CPU ran faster than 2MHz... (not GHz) The fastest link, mid 80s the Boston globe could get going from one side of town to the other was a T2 microwave link, 6Mb, so until Bill Gates started selling pc's to anyone, it was a close and honest community, not without the odd ones, but anti social was the 'uunet' red line I guess. How long did the gets() vulnerability remain unexploited? Years. People didn't break into other systems as a usual thing. That was 40 years ago though and things just aren't the same. The Arduino crowd strikes me as having some of the hobbyist sort of enthusiasm you'd see back then.

  • lucaswiman
    ［ object Object ］ (@lucaswiman) reported

    Plausible paths for Google: 1. They will also start falling behind in TPU design. TPUs will cease to even notionally be a realistic competitor to big players. Maybe they'll sell the IP and TSMC allocation to OpenAI or Anthropic or AMD, or spin it out into an underresourced separate entity. 2. GCP will do very well for a time. Existing LLM inference capacity is going to get more valuable over time, commanding higher prices. At some point, they'll be left with second-rate hardware that's been dramatically outcompeted by ultra-efficient RSI hardware and data centers. It's not inconceivable that their TPUs will literally have the HBM chips pried off of them to put into better hardware by a competitor. 3. Search will have gone from merely declining in usage to declining rapidly in revenue. This will continue for some time as a viable business, like AOL, Juno and yahoo, but with a shrinking user base of aging retirees or barely-online people. They will embrace every dark pattern in the book to adsmaxx, but their core "indexing and understanding all the world's information" will have long since been done much better by model companies. 4. They'll probably release a quite good Gemini or two from inertia this year. Not necessarily SOTA, but good enough to cause a stock rally. This is probably the last place for someone like Sergei Brin to assert control and save the company. 5. Eventually the massive amount of debt taken on building GCP and getting returned as buybacks will catch up with them after a credit downgrade. They'll get ripped apart for scraps at the org level, with stakes in various AI companies constituting most of their value, like yahoo! did with alibaba. Sundar Pichai will walk away enormously wealthy having maximized ******** out of some shareholder value.

  • AuntieM2024
    Auntie M (@AuntieM2024) reported

    @Matt_Pinner 19. Never had an AOL account.

  • Noodoggy
    Cajun ****** ☭🇵🇸🍉 (@Noodoggy) reported

    @HorrorGorl Can't help it. It's ingrained from 30 years ago in AOL chat rooms lol

  • CyberTLDR
    CyberTLDR (@CyberTLDR) reported

    2/3 PortSwigger's Gareth Heyes showed it at Black Hat. One Outlook chain spoofs a Microsoft sign in and grabs the typed password. A Yahoo/AOL paste race leaks a login token. A Gmail chain exfiltrates a Slack token after prompt injection. #InfoSec #Privacy #CyberAttack

  • sspriint
    sprint (@sspriint) reported

    AOL and Time Warner merged in a $165,000,000,000 deal, and two years later the company wrote off $99,000,000,000 in a single year. The announcement came in January 2000, weeks before the dot-com peak. An internet company buying one of the largest media empires on earth. AOL was the smaller business by revenue and profit. It had the stock price, which was the currency that made the deal possible. Steve Case and Gerald Levin stood on stage and called it the future. Dial-up subscribers plus film studios, cable systems, magazines, and music. Then the bubble burst. AOL's advertising revenue collapsed, and the subscriber business began dying as broadband arrived and nobody needed dial-up anymore. The cultures never combined. Time Warner executives resented being bought with inflated paper, and the AOL side found the media business slow. In 2002 the company reported a loss of about $99,000,000,000, the largest annual loss in American corporate history. Almost all of it was writing down the value of AOL itself. The AOL name came off the company in 2003. The two businesses split apart entirely in 2009. Levin later apologized publicly and called himself responsible. The biggest deal ever signed destroyed more value than most companies ever create.

  • ADereyan
    Antranig Dereyan (@ADereyan) reported

    Hey @HeyHeyItsConrad I’m listening to ur pod w @EBischoff on @WWE invasion & I think the real path to go down would be if Turner bought WWF & Eric had that money to bring in WWF talent into WCW & do invasion or another storyline.Might,need to say AOL merger never happens either.