AOL outages and service status in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

Problems in the last 24 hours in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Otookee (@Otookee1) reported 3 minutes ago

  @woofknight 19. Only one I’m missing is the AOL address - I never used AOL despite them sending me many complementary disks, I was into weirder and more obscure BBSes.

• 
  MichaelJensen1 (@_Kadmos1) reported 4 minutes ago

  If Netflix won, I would still oppose it. I tend to not be a fan of these media mergers. AOL TimeWarner should have not been allowed. Microsoft getting Activision Blizzard was a bad idea. SkyDance getting Paramount? Horrible. Disney getting 20CF? Stupid. Now, the 2006 Disney-Pixar merger I do side with. Disney getting Marvel and Lucasfilm? Wish the smaller 20CF got both of those companies.

• 
  l0n0⚡👁 (@AdventureDr) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MrHodl People are just stupid a lot of the time. That guys been a train wreck almost from moment 1. An ego driven pervert. Basically he would of fit in well during the hight of AOL.........

• 
  Styles (@LexD934949) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AnaAnsan3 Nintendo and Sony would have been stuck in the late 1990s with AOL service setups if it weren’t for PC gaming and the original Xbox (the original Steam Machine).

• 
  Mark Carney's Elbows (@Carneys_Elbows) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Soaringeagle45 AOL wasn't big in Canada. And I've sat on a waterbed but never slept on one.

• 
  Bradley S. Klein 🇺🇦 (@BradleySKlein) reported 11 minutes ago

  I’m sure this will sound like the roar of a dinosaur, but as a (remaining) AOL user, I had a serious tech issue of access, called them, they answered, and a very helpful, patient human walked me through a reprogramming procedure with one of my computers to restore access. Easy

• 
  Chrissy (@mschrissynicole) reported 14 minutes ago

  Just saw an ad from yahoo….i didn’t even know we still had yahoo…good for them damn. I remember when I had a yahoo email address. Everyone else had aol and hotmail but my dad wouldn’t let me bc he thought I was too young (aka he was stricked) so I snuck and got a yahoo email.

• 
  Pelo_dave1 (@PeloDave1) reported 15 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 19…..never had an aol account

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 16 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

• 
  Cat6_whiteplate (@CA_mk2) reported 23 minutes ago

  @LucifersTweetz Aol? You got dial up as torture down there?