AOL outages and service status in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

Problems in the last 24 hours in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  MewMew Monke💛🍌| Monkey Vtuber (@MewMew_Monke) reported 5 minutes ago

  @YomiQuinnley WTF IS AN AOL???

• 
  lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest

• 
  Aüd! 🎡 #SWAG (@lyfeisgood111) reported 7 minutes ago

  I guess I’m just some guy that poke around because I don’t know Yeahhhh ion know **** but I knew exactly who to ask for and look for… Just like Ben laden How ah ***** knowing but he didn’t know nun… CIA thankfully I gee up on AOL ppl duck and hide and still get found!

• 
  Salvo (@Salvo8284) reported 9 minutes ago

  @AYTOarchive Never saw that, but kept getting AOL CD's in the mail for ages.

• 
  Thomas Howell (@ThomasHowe1184) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AlexanderSoros @TechCrunch Yeah and AOL is number 1 in internet connection service. ******* lowlife piece of ****. Get ******** out of America. **********

• 
  Rock Hard & Spew Facts (@JCA_BelAir) reported 13 minutes ago

  @jamusp Yeah, but their servers are all still running Win2K Server and Bob lost the database passwords when AOL took them over That's really why they won't change it--Vivian in the Mail Room has them written down on a PostIt stuck to the backside of the plotter printer, but don't tell anyone. It's hilarious watching Bob grumble and act like he's not still looking for it every morning while he tries to make his coffee last him until lunch since they caught him using a 2nd K-cup but he only bought into one share of the employee coffee pool Bob's a douche. He also manages their social media accounts, btw. Just sayin'

• 
  Crowsky📎 (@Crowsky13) reported 13 minutes ago

  @IzzatStatus The subscription model has been coming for years tbh. Remember how AOL stayed in business simply because so many people never canceled? Combined with the full erosion of ToS contracts, consumers are getting the shaft big time

• 
  (PRESS)Scotty Fife (aka) NevNukeMonster (@fife_scotty680) reported 14 minutes ago

  @TommyO1947 And every body posted pictures on face book too So who is to blame, the consumer. They kept posting stuff on the lives, and leaving updates at default. Man followed right off the pier. AOL for a while all were using it. Then the discovery of FTP lmao No more chatting in public, we built are own room and games too. And not one American can go without that comm unit for a week All seem naked without, there is a problem. Powerless over that or the next follower post. GodRocks Crazy

• 
  attitunes music (@attitunesmusic) reported 16 minutes ago

  @JuicySteen there was a strong appetite by some at AOL Time Warner to get them off the air despite being their highest rated show. It would have depended on if they were able to hang on until Spike opened up.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 19 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.