AOL outages and service status in Oregon City, Oregon

Problems in the last 24 hours in Oregon City, Oregon

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Oregon City, Oregon and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Wong Joon Ian (@joonian) reported 2 minutes ago

  AOL Mail is the outlier here. Wtf??

• 
  theRinga𝕏 (@theRingaX) reported 4 minutes ago

  @h_e_p_56 @rationalaxiom I ran a lawn/snow/leaves company made $14.4M by selling the software & web design so that when AOL dialup was going people could see an ad for a service near them. Simple HTML I was 17 sitting in business class Junior year and this fool great guy trying to tell me?

• 
  Robyn O'Donnell (@RobynDODonnell) reported 7 minutes ago

  @FOXLA All I can say is Paramount+ sucks. I tried it twice. It is a technical glitch disaster on my TV. It just loads like it was AOL dial-up! Give me a break!

• 
  Content Soul✌️🎯🩵 (@rajeshkodavati) reported 8 minutes ago

  5/ The payoff is already showing: OpenAI signed on as TCS's data centre business's first customer, starting with 100 megawatts of capacity as part of the $500 billion Stargate initiative. (aol) Tata Group will also roll out ChatGPT Enterprise internally.

• 
  Weston Rosch (@rosch_weston) reported 11 minutes ago

  Who ******** is using AOL Mail

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 13 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for sports-related stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

• 
  Jzell2285 (@jzell2285) reported 14 minutes ago

  @doc_1029 @KickRocks2026 I agree with you. I got to say, though...Years ago. AOL was the king. And I was involved w an online game. N I got to tell u the two techie guys would argue every week during n after our missions I loved watching them argue. Some kind of voyeurism issue I don't know. But I got a kick out of it

• 
  Arlo Gilbert (@arlogilbert) reported 14 minutes ago

  History tells us that the companies that are early leaders in a software category rarely remain so. Altavista? Excite? InfoSeek? You're old if you remember those, but at the time they were dominant. Then came Yahoo, then Google... Years later. AOL? EarthLink? Compuserve? They were the Internet for most users. Now? Telcos & Cable cos reinvented themselves as consumer ISPs and dial up mostly died. The historical examples go way beyond software. The point is that although OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok/X, Google are dominating AI right now, things change in ways we can't forecast. The next better faster cheaper different AI solution that erases some current leaders probably hasn't been created yet. I do wonder though, who dies first? I'm talking 5-10 year window.

• 
  RLDThree (@RLDThree) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation PSN is always going down. Worst online service since AOL. Anyway, it's an excuse for the physical media moaners to start up.

• 
  RobertWilliam (@RobertTheMonk0) reported 15 minutes ago

  Look I was on the Internet when it first started. I was on like the first chat rooms on AOL and **** yknow , but it was all bullshit and you talk **** and everything was ******* bullshit. I still feel the same way about it. People get all but hurt these days tho lol