Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	7 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cosmos (@fcoursedk) reported 3 minutes ago

  Any help how I can import my DeFi wallet to binance

• 
  The Announcer🐧 (@TheAnnouncerUK) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Ayzacoder This is not real. There is no verified 19-year-old (American or otherwise) who built a Claude Code trading bot in 2 days that turned $68 into $750,000.This exact claim (or near-identical versions swapping “American”/“Japanese,” the same $68 start, $6,732 first-night profit, $750k total, iPad second monitor, “50 markets,” Binance BTC data, arbitrage on price errors, etc.) has been circulating for months as recycled engagement-bait. Multiple independent checks, including prior analyses of the accompanying dashboard videos, show:No name, no identity, no GitHub, no wallet addresses, no on-chain records, no trade history, and no credible proof of any kind. The video is a sped-up simulated trading interface (often labeled or clearly stylized as simulated / unrealistic PnL curves), not live verified results. Accounts post the story, then demand “Comment ‘Fable’ + Like + Repost + Follow” so they can “DM the complete setup.” This is classic engagement farming. The DMs (if any arrive) are typically empty, a generic prompt, an upsell, a phishing attempt for API keys/exchange credentials, or worse.

• 
  Brian Smith (@Order_Flow_Z) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance so the whole point is that L2s only exist because L1s are too slow and expensive kind of an admission that the base layer still needs a crutch

• 
  Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported 5 minutes ago

  July 2026 Exchange Spot Volume Report: total $429.0 billion, MoM decreased 21.7% Spot trading volume across 14 major exchanges totaled $429.0 billion in July 2026, down 21.7% from $547.9 billion in June, with all 14 exchanges recording month-over-month declines. Binance ranked first with $196.5 billion in volume, accounting for 45.8% of the total, followed by OKX with $41.6 billion and Bybit with $36.3 billion. The top three exchanges together accounted for 64.0% of total spot volume. Among the 14 exchanges, Uniswap recorded the smallest month-over-month decline at 9.8%, followed by Kraken at 13.4% and Gate at 15.9%. Bitfinex posted the steepest decline at 59.7%, followed by Coinbase at 26.4% and Bybit at 24.5%.

• 
  Neeballs (@Neeballs) reported 13 minutes ago

  0xe1e399bcff598724a77c2619fc991b3600397777 could be something could not TLDR Binance is expanding its margin-collateral options by allowing eligible users to pledge GMEB (GameStop tokenized securities) as collateral, but this is not the same as allowing users to use actual GME shares, and access is highly restricted geographically and by account eligibility. big highlight on geographical and account eligibility....... nonetheless decent stride forward for bnb RWA as a whole 23k mc

• 
  Cryptoalphacall (@Cryptoalph360) reported 16 minutes ago

  $CYS update Retail is shorting the top with leverage, which fuels the move up. Price is up 40% on the day, liquidating over $1M in short positions. Meanwhile smart money whales are long, $8M, average entry around 1.00. 79% of them in profit. Whale shorts are the minority at 1M$. OI on Binance ~27M. Strong resistance sits at 1.4-1.55, filled with sell limits. Support below is thinner. Watch these levels. They can be a target for longs to take profit, which could correct price. If shorts keep covering their leveraged positions, it can drive price higher. #cys #cysusdt

• 
  Hoogie (@H0ogie) reported 22 minutes ago

  @TheDeFiAngel @binance Both approaches seem to be working

• 
  Người Chơi Coin (@moneygame47) reported 23 minutes ago

  The bottom for #Marscoin could be somewhere around $20M → $45M market cap (personal opinion). First, I want to reiterate that I’m very bullish on $Marscoin. Marscoin currently holds a leading position in the Meme Stock narrative on BSC. There’s a very high chance that $Marscoin will eventually get listed on Binance. I’m not sure whether it will be a Spot or Futures listing, but I think Binance will at least list the Futures contract. That’s why I’m going to accumulate $Marscoin and wait for the next pump after the listing. As for why I’m looking to accumulate in the $20M–$40M range, it’s because I’ve noticed that Marscoin tends to trade sideways within a wide range. Sometimes the price looks like it’s about to break through support, only to pump hard afterward — almost as if the MM is intentionally creating a bear trap to shake out holders. So I’ll be watching the $45M, $35M, $25M, and $20M support levels for potential entries. I don’t know which one will actually be the bottom for $Marscoin, so I think the best approach is to split my capital and buy gradually at each support zone. Waiting for $Marscoin to go to the moon! 🚀🌕

• 
  Sarosh (@SaroshQ2022) reported 24 minutes ago

  The big story is Iran & elevated Macro. Plus CPI & PPI fear and so SUI is cooling along with Bitcoin. SUI internals still look better than the price suggests. The biggest change is that futures have weakened and leveraged longs are getting flushed, while spot demand is holding up much better. That tells me this looks more like a leverage reset than people abandoning SUI. The one thing I am watching closely is crowded long positioning. If spot keeps absorbing the weakness while leverage continues to come out, this pullback is healthy. If spot starts breaking down too, then the picture changes. For now, I would call SUI constructive, but cooling. FULL READ BELOW SUI Data Analysis — August 11, 2026 In a Nutshell SUI has pulled back to roughly $0.681, but the internals are not showing a complete breakdown. What has changed is the balance underneath the move: futures participation has weakened over the larger intraday windows, while spot is holding up better than derivatives. That is important. This looks more like a leveraged reset inside an improving broader structure than spot holders aggressively abandoning SUI. Price Is Pulling Back SUI is around $0.681, down roughly 1.56% over 24 hours. The shorter window is better: • 4-hour performance: +0.64% But the larger relative picture remains weak: • 7-day: -1.34% • 30-day: -6.44% • 90-day: -44.97% So I am not going to pretend the price structure is suddenly strong. The improvement we saw last week has hit resistance and SUI is now consolidating that move. Open Interest Is Still Elevated Open interest is roughly $533 million, which is actually higher than the approximately $507 million we were looking at a couple of days ago. That matters because despite the pullback, leverage has not disappeared from the market. But when I look underneath that aggregate number, the exchange data is mixed. Some exchanges are still adding OI: • Binance: roughly +$0.3% • Gate: roughly +3.5% • MEXC: roughly +4.0% But others are reducing exposure: • Bybit: roughly -0.9% • Bitget: roughly -2.2% • BingX: roughly -28% So the OI picture is no longer uniformly expanding. Futures Flows Have Clearly Deteriorated This is the biggest change from the August 9 data. Short-term futures flows are positive: • 5-minute: +$345K • 15-minute: +$321K • 30-minute: +$378K But once I move farther out: • 1-hour: -$107K • 4-hour: -$830K • 8-hour: -$5.91M • 12-hour: -$4.00M That is a meaningful shift. Two days ago, the 4-hour, 8-hour and 12-hour futures windows were all positive. Now they are negative. So derivatives traders have clearly been reducing exposure into this pullback. Spot Is Holding Up Better This is where the data gets more interesting. Spot flows are mixed, but the larger windows are considerably healthier than futures: • 5-minute: -$10K • 15-minute: +$18K • 30-minute: +$31K • 1-hour: -$35K • 4-hour: +$369K • 8-hour: -$95K • 12-hour: +$527K That 12-hour number is particularly important because while futures are showing roughly -$4 million, spot is showing approximately +$527K. So the weakness is being driven much more aggressively through derivatives than through spot. That is a better setup than seeing both futures and spot getting dumped together. Liquidations Confirm the Reset The liquidation numbers are overwhelmingly hitting longs. Over 24 hours: • Long liquidations: roughly $652K • Short liquidations: roughly $81K Over 12 hours: • Long liquidations: roughly $524K • Short liquidations: roughly $69K So leveraged longs have been getting flushed. That fits perfectly with what the futures-flow data is telling us. The market built more leverage during the recent move, price failed to immediately continue higher, and some of those longs are now being forced out. That is not necessarily bearish by itself. Sometimes this is exactly what a market needs before attempting another move. Long Positioning Is Still Crowded The long/short ratios remain elevated: • Binance accounts: 2.13 • OKX accounts: 3.02 • Binance top traders: 2.62 • Binance top trader positions: 2.32 This is still the part I do not love. Too many traders are leaning in the same direction. So even if the broader SUI setup remains constructive, there is still plenty of fuel for additional long liquidations if price gets pushed lower. Funding Is Still Controlled The OI-weighted funding chart remains mostly positive but not disorderly. That tells me traders are still willing to pay to remain long, but we are not seeing the kind of extreme funding spike that would make me think the entire structure is dangerously overheated. So leverage is elevated, but it has not reached a level where I would call it completely out of control. Bottom Line The internals are not as bullish as they were on August 9, and I think we need to say that clearly. Futures flows have deteriorated. Long liquidations have increased. The long side is still crowded. And price has pulled back. But underneath that, spot is holding considerably better than derivatives, especially over the 4-hour and 12-hour windows. That tells me the recent weakness looks more like leveraged traders being cleaned out than broad spot capitulation. And that is the distinction I care about. A couple of days ago, SUI was expanding out of compression and everything underneath it was improving at the same time. Today we are seeing the first real test of that move. So now I want to see whether spot continues absorbing the weakness while futures leverage resets. If that happens, this pullback is healthy. If spot begins turning consistently negative alongside futures, then the picture changes. For now, I would call SUI constructive but cooling — with derivatives resetting while spot remains surprisingly resilient.

• 
  Amy (@QWEqwe1122yqp) reported 24 minutes ago

  @whale_alert This large volume of mainstream cryptocurrencies suddenly being transferred out of compliant custodians could lead to significant issues if they subsequently flow into exchanges like Binance or OKX

• 
  Dr Crypto (@DrCrypto__X) reported 25 minutes ago

  @xiejiayinBitget @nancy_c813 This is exactly the kind of response the crypto industry needs. Acknowledging the problem openly, taking responsibility, and compensating affected users deserves genuine respect. You and the Bitget team have my full respect for taking this step. But I believe there is an even more important question that deserves a transparent answer: How was something like this able to happen in the first place? What exactly caused these abnormal price movements? How was the market structure able to allow them, and more importantly, can this be prevented from happening again? Because this is not something we are seeing on one exchange alone. We have repeatedly seen smaller or highly volatile tokens on major exchanges, including Bitget and Binance, experience extreme and suspicious price movements that end up liquidating millions of dollars in users’ positions. Yes, anyone trading with high leverage accepts significant risk. Traders must take responsibility for the leverage they choose. But at some point, exchanges also have to ask whether simply offering extreme leverage in markets that can be manipulated so aggressively is enough. It feels a little like giving someone access to an addictive drug and then putting all the responsibility on them for continuing to use it. Major exchanges are no longer just marketplaces. They are part of the infrastructure of this industry, and with that position comes responsibility. I believe Bitget, Binance, and other major exchanges need to take serious steps to identify and prevent this kind of market manipulation before users lose millions, rather than only dealing with the consequences afterward. Crypto has already lost enormous liquidity, trust, and many people who genuinely believed in its future because of situations like these. Your decision to acknowledge the problem and compensate users is a great step. Now I hope the next step is prevention. Let’s make crypto great again.

• 
  Belinkov (@kriptomanikk) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Superp_xyz @binance listing scam token on his app, you are adding more token in circulation while in investor are down and not saying anything!

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 26 minutes ago

  @dogeboyOS @binance migration support closed july 23. monitoring tag announced august 11. binance reviewed glmr after the migration window ended and flagged higher volatility risk. no hidden drama. exchanges re-evaluate tokens constantly. monitoring tag means glmr stays listed but binance watches it closer for potential delisting if metrics deteriorate further.

• 
  Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) reported 28 minutes ago

  $XRP is about to break the phsychological $1 support. While most people will freak out, and will likely trip a cascading sell down to 0.95, it's important to note the 24h volume. On Binance it's a mere $68M, down from well over $1BN At these numbers it's very simple to manipulate. Lots of people opening long positions because theyvthink the bottom is in, and this is ripe for Binance and VIPs to liquidste these positi9ns quite easily with only very small slush fund. Current order books super thin, with only $4M sells triggering drop to 0.95 level, and likely closing out millions in longs. That's the name of the game.

• 
  ً (@trading_axe) reported 28 minutes ago

  The OGs had to pave the wave for you ******. They created the blueprint - things that you [BY DEFAULT now] utilize without thinking much of. They survived the endless rugs, exchange implosions, exit scams, predatory dealflow, countless liquidations of hundreds of BTC because nothing worked properly etc. etc. Everything you have now is ABSURDLY EASY because the OGs have already gone through the punishment FOR YOU to learn from. And you’re a fool to think trading back then was easy. It was difficult to create capital out of nothing. You can get 1 SOL now and with all the nefarious tactics “in the trenches” - you can run it up just by deving/bundling coins to rug on repeat. What did you do back then? You had to register on Binance [that went down every hour because of congested traffic] and most exchanges were limiting account creations to buy the 10th derivative of a whitelisted private sale shitcoin that had a 50/50 chance of going to zero or x10ing for an hour before spiralling to zero. And this is whilst everyone thought that the blockchain was some new tech that was going to be the future so rather than converting profits to BTC, You’d hold the shitcoin thinking it would revolutionize the world. Nobody trusted stables / Tether at the time either, so forget that. It was never “vs plumbers” it was entering a completely new game with crazy maps and exploring it for the first time getting nuked left and right. You guys now have “tutorials” for everything to learn from and copy. The game is complete, it’s EASIER than ever before. Sure, the participants are slightly sharper and by sharper I mean more devious, cunning and money hungry [knowing that “everything is a scam.”] But the game itself has gotten far easier because there’s nothing YOU DON’T KNOW. ~ Dr. Axius.

• 
  Klawse (@Klawsee) reported 30 minutes ago

  @RanaCreater333 @BinanceWallet @binance same problem happend to me yesterday well i contacted support they didn't to seem to care

• 
  Cyclo Trading System (@cyclosoluctions) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk I reached out multiple times, and the support team's lack of knowledge was evident. I followed up via email but received no response—which is extremely frustrating; I kept pressing for an answer but got nowhere. Now they’ve promised me a reply, yet so far, nothing. I feel like Binance has grown so large that innovative ideas—unless they come with a massive amount of money—don't get the attention they deserve.

• 
  0xNaveed 🇵🇰 (@navex_eth) reported 32 minutes ago

  GM, Crypto 🇵🇰 Pakistan is making a serious move into regulated crypto. The Virtual Assets Act 2026 has opened the door for licensed crypto firms to access banking services under PVARA oversight. With Binance cleared, plans for tokenized state assets, and even discussions around a Bitcoin strategic reserve, Pakistan’s crypto story is getting interesting. The regulatory race is heating up. ₿

• 
  mandaC🇱🇨 (@Mamacastang28) reported 37 minutes ago

  @binance Working

• 
  Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported 39 minutes ago

  @SarahNelsonv2t Listen those bags aren't gonna average themselves down. but yeah binance literally listed half my watchlist the week i finally stopped watching it, timing is a joke sometimes. at least bstocks volume might pull some eyes back to spot

• 
  JESUSisLORD (@ForTheCross_CH) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Vern_Levine_ @binance My YouTube videos and Telegram were made private, with the reasons posted in my group. My website was replaced to be validator and LUNC focused.

• 
  JESUSisLORD (@ForTheCross_CH) reported 42 minutes ago

  @LeonardoLUNC @binance Only Binances internal wallet movements are presently whitelisted, though we have the capacity to offer even further whitelisting. Deposits from the chain by users to Binance and withdrawals to the chain are subject to the 1.5% tax. Having deposits and withdrawals down means people are not sending to Binance or able to withdraw new LUNC from Binance to the chain, significantly impacting on-chain volume and burns. I have reviewed your tracker which provides helpful information.

• 
  Selene (@SeleneOdds) reported 49 minutes ago

  On Saturday I had dinner with a close friend who's been a trader at Citadel for the past 6 years We love talking prediction markets — he trades macro, I trade sports — and one thing we kept discussing is how *** are looping through the same problems traditional financial markets already solved The most recent example: Polymarket's new time-weighted average price (TWAP) settlement rules Polymarket has crypto up/down markets where you bet on whether BTC finishes above or below a price after a certain time frame (5 minutes, 15 minutes, 1 hour, etc.). Until last week, those used to resolve off a single Chainlink price printed the moment the contract ends. So if a 5-min market starts at 1:00 AM EST, the contract resolves based on the exact price at 1:05 AM EST. As of August 7 that's changed. Settlement is now a Chainlink-computed 30-60 second TWAP. Instead of asking "what was BTC at 1:05:00," it asks "what did BTC average from 1:04:30 to 1:05:00." The reason for the change is simple (it's a bit surprising they hadn't done it sooner). When settlement is based on a single point in time, anyone holding a Polymarket position and enough capital to move BTC a few dollars for a few seconds has a very large incentive to do so. Say I own "Up" and BTC is sitting just under the strike with ten seconds left: I’ll fire market buys into Binance, sweeping the offer stack until the last print clears my strike. Chainlink samples that instant, the contract resolves Up, my 40c shares pay a dollar. If I own the “Down” contract then it's the same move in reverse. Afterwards I unwind. Nothing about my sweep was new market info (I just took liquidity that was sitting there) so the moment I stop, makers re-quote and the price drifts back. I sell the BTC back into that recovery and come out roughly flat. My cost is the round-trip slippage on a 90-second position. My revenue is the Poly contracts. The profit margin is the difference. These are binaries so I don't need a real move, just the price on the right side of a line at one instant, which overnight and on weekends is cheap. It defeats the purpose of a price forecasting market when you're the one setting the price. A Stanford working paper in July put numbers on it: ~16,000 five-minute BTC contracts over two months, 821 suspected manipulators, roughly $8.2M in profits, with net order flow on Binance spiking ~50% in the final ten seconds before settlement. It clustered overnight and on weekends — thin book, small order, big move.  Polymarket denies manipulation occurred. They shipped TWAP anyway, plus $1M in liquidity rewards through August to keep makers around through the transition. In traditional finance, this exact scenario already happened multiple times long ago. Cboe was one example that came to mind. Continue reading below 🧵

• 
  Cryptoalphacall (@Cryptoalph360) reported 54 minutes ago

  $CYS update Retail is shorting the top with leverage, which fuels the move up. Price is up 40% on the day, liquidating over $1M in short positions. Meanwhile smart money whales are long, $8M, average entry around 1.00. 79% of them in profit. Whale shorts are the minority at 1M$. OI on Binance ~27M. Strong resistance sits at 1.4-1.55, filled with sell limits. Support below is thinner. Watch these levels. They can be a target for longs to take profit, which could correct price. If shorts keep covering their leveraged positions, it can drive price higher. #cys #cysusdt

• 
  HERE WE GO! (@escape2defi) reported 54 minutes ago

  Hey all - remember Oct 10, 2025? ethereum:0x4e3fbd56cd56c3e72c1403e103b45db9da5b9d2b data from that day: • Opened around $3.25 • Spiked down to a printed low of ~$0.74 (some exchange prints even lower, e.g. sub-$0.50 on Binance) • Closed the day around $2.08–$2.17 That was wild.

• 
  Baris (@Barisaktass35) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance **** you ************* scammers

• 
  Doan Trang (@Doantrangoffice) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance IBMB holders before 10 Aug 2026 can now claim a 1.69 USD dividend per share, paid in additional IBMB. Great news for eligible holders. Have you checked your distribution yet? Share an update and help others confirm their reward. 🎉

• 
  tarık (@tark45738292) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance Enough is enough, for ****'s sake, Binance—every single day you list an altcoin, and every single day you put another one under review and delist it.

• 
  Ajeet Soni (@ajeetsoni11993) reported 60 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance Hello VL, Case ID: 167180993 Complaint Reference: CC9794092 I already raised the issue in live chat and also sent the video. My ₹2000 USDT was sent to KAIA network without giving me option to change network. Please help with refund or recovery. Thank you

• 
  Rock1988 (@cmaDxB) reported 60 minutes ago

  @WatcherGuru Crypto went from shitcoin to deepshit coin. Nobody want Binance deepshitcoin anymore , they made last round money from deepshit coin creator as listing fee as much possible... Nobody anymore have to smell it to find its **** , it's visible from far away that is deepshit...