Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	18 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	23 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Allan Marshall (@UpexiAllan) reported 4 minutes ago

  .@Coinbase turned on tokenized US stocks. These are backed one to one by the real shares, so you own the stock itself and collect the dividends, and it settles onchain any hour of any day. The part that matters is who gets access. This launched for people outside the US first, the markets where owning American stocks has always meant a broker, a wire, and a week of waiting. Now it's an app and a few seconds. The US is still waiting on the rules. Once people can hold real stocks the same way they hold dollars in an app, the line between a brokerage and a wallet stops meaning much.

• 
  Matt Hawkins (@b_mattew) reported 6 minutes ago

  @coinbase your sign in recovery process is not working. It sends me into an endless loop. **** you for making me play a game to try to sign end over and over

• 
  Eraas (@CryptoEraas) reported 12 minutes ago

  Robinhood chain is here to stay, you are either taking asymetric bet on $HOOD or have fun staying poor They did not even start the marketing on the chain so much higher its actually insane in hindsight, you will be like "**** I JEETED THE BOTTOM AGAIN I THOUGHT ITS DYING" No, Robinhood is 100B stock, Coinbase is 50B stock memes on base were flying hard as ****, Brett was like 2b mc in bullrun you have to think HIGHER Be delusional WIN

• 
  Weezy (@WeezyTheDuke) reported 12 minutes ago

  @dylanmallman @beinlibertarian coinbase is no better … they just shut down my account didn’t tell me why and told me i can still withdraw my account but could not tell me why they shut it down .. i gamble a bit but nothing more nefarious than that

• 
  Temitope Owoseeni💎 (@owoweb3) reported 13 minutes ago

  📊 #USDT CeFi lending experienced its first contraction since Q3 2024, declining 6% QoQ to $23.3B. Tether still holds 68% of the market despite a 7% pullback. Nexo, Maple, and Coinbase were the only lenders that saw growth. Galaxy and Ledn faced significant losses, down 21% and 19%, respectively.

• 
  Amhed (@amhedH) reported 14 minutes ago

  My @Chase cards stopped working for onboarding into @coinbase today. Happen to anyone else? I called support and reps are saying all crypto transactions are now blocked from debit card usage.

• 
  Crypto Horizon (@horizonxcrypto) reported 14 minutes ago

  Unfollow everyone who told you to short #BTC at the 58K zone😫 If they’re actually good traders, they should know that this was a major liquidity flush designed to wipe out weak hands twice As I said, July isn’t going to be a crazy bullish month, but we should see a recovery after the market has fully cleaned out excessive leverage. That’s simply how markets operate. I also pointed out that the Coinbase Premium Index turned positive after two weeks in the red, suggesting that large players stepped in to support BTC around the 58K level. The 62K area is a major resistance zone because a lot of short positions are concentrated there. Don’t FOMO into longs at that level when the R:R isn’t attractive. If #BTC can hold above $64K, there will likely be plenty of opportunities for altcoins. Take profits on all positions once BTC reaches that target zone🫡

• 
  Greg.base.eth (@hryhorii77) reported 15 minutes ago

  @coinbase Base can fix it easily

• 
  Frederik Lund (@fallund) reported 19 minutes ago

  Open USD launched on June 30. Circle stock fell 17%. Tether didn't move. This is why? 140 companies — Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, Coinbase, Google, Shopify — launched a stablecoin that passes reserve yield to its partners instead of retaining it at the issuer. Most headlines called it a Tether threat. The market disagreed. The reason is straightforward once you understand that the stablecoin market is not one market. Tether made a deliberate choice. MiCA's 60% bank reserve requirement was incompatible with its Treasury-based yield model. Tether exited Europe and doubled down on its core use case — crypto trading, cross-border remittances, and shadow dollar demand in emerging markets. These are not markets Open USD is designed to serve. Circle made the opposite choice. MiCA-authorised, regulated, institutional. 96% of Circle's income comes from interest earned on the Treasuries backing USDC. Open USD is built to hand that yield to its partners instead. The threat is aimed directly at Circle's profit engine. The fragmentation was always going to happen. Tether chose the unregulated corridor. Circle chose the regulated one. Open USD just entered Circle's lane with 140 partners whose financial incentive is to route volume away from USDC. One honest caveat: Paxos launched a similar yield-sharing consortium stablecoin in late 2024. It has $3 billion in circulation against USDC's $73 billion. The gap between committed partners and actual volume is where consortium stablecoins go to die. The 17% move in Circle was the market repricing what Circle is worth in a world where its yield model has a credible competitor. Tether didn't move because it isn't in that world.

• 
  Nuke (@Crypto_Nuclear_) reported 23 minutes ago

  I'll say it. Only about a month in, it's already very clear to me that builder support on @solana is 100x better than @base. Base talks a lot about supporting builders but doesn't actually do **** unless you're backed by their VC or if you are an ex-@coinbase employee 🫳🎤

• 
  Vivek Kotecha (@vbkotecha) reported 24 minutes ago

  Everyone building autonomous agents will face the same governance wall. Recursive action loops. Token budgets with real money. Financial decisions without human review. Who is liable when an autonomous agent makes a bad trade? When it hires a sub-agent that fails? When it pays for a service that does not deliver? Coinbase Advisor registered with the SEC. OKX built escrow and dispute resolution. The companies building compliance infrastructure today will be the only ones allowed to operate tomorrow.

• 
  Gera92 (@SolG_420) reported 26 minutes ago

  @IcedKnife at this point cobie scamming coinbase is basically public service

• 
  Johnny Spider (@notJohnnySpider) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph • On-chain facts confirmed: Arkham Intelligence data shows 500 BTC (~$30.85M) moved from a wallet cluster labeled “Clifton Collins: Lost Keys” to a Coinbase Prime deposit address, as part of ~1,500 BTC transferred since March 2026. • Misleading attribution: The post incorrectly states that drug dealer Clifton Collins made the deposit; Irish Criminal Assets Bureau (CAB), supported by Europol and Gardaí, recovered and moved the seized funds after gaining access to the long-dormant wallets. • Background context: Collins bought ~6,000 BTC in 2011-2012 with criminal proceeds; keys were lost after his 2017 arrest, leaving ~4,500 BTC still in other seized wallets under ongoing recovery efforts.

• 
  Megazine (@MegazineHD) reported 29 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Why? Why not go with Solana? What a big fumble. Even Coinbase BASE is awful.

• 
  tania tahera (@TaheraTani19144) reported 32 minutes ago

  @base @coinbase Coinbase, your team made a terrible decision. My account is fully verified and compliant for last 6 years,restricting it for weeks, you're closing it while my investment is down 90%, forcing me into huge loss. I will pursue legal action and make sure everyone hears my experience

• 
  Abyss 🔺🤞 (@Cancer_kkkun) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Stupifff @himgajria 30m to coinbase will fix this

• 
  Kaiji 🃏 (@DefiKaiji) reported 33 minutes ago

  @UpexiAllan @coinbase Real ownership with dividends is a meaningful difference. It is not just another synthetic asset, which could help build more trust in tokenized finance.

• 
  She’s With Me 🎈🌻 🇭🇹 🥭🍋 (@BookOfPash) reported 33 minutes ago

  @PeriodPointJae @WNBA @coinbase Ehhh yeah actually we can see less of Spike and we should. He’s an acclaimed director - not a mascot of a basketball team. He’s been in front of the cameras like he’s a starting 5 and he’s not. **** is wrong with YOU? Go fan out on his page - not in my comments.

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 36 minutes ago

  The man who dissolved his company into a token just sold the company and retained the token Venice just completed the cleanest equity round in the crypto space - no presale, PMF first, VC tokens locked. And once again, it proves the truth about every dual structure out there: the token is the marketing layer. Credit first, since it's the truth. Product-market fit before the $VVV airdrop. 18 months of open trading before any external capital. Investor tokens on a 1-year cliff with 3-year linear vesting. Supply release ~0.2% of daily volume. Company has never sold tokens through a 700% YTD rally. Against the low-float-high-FDV model, this is top-decile behavior. Now the details. 1/ The unicorn numbers require the token to close. $65m for 8.98% prices the equity at at most $724m, not $1b. 8.98% of $1b would give $89.8m; investors paid $65m in cash. The ~$25m difference is essentially the 1.5m VVV grant at spot. Only by valuing the community's token treasury as part of the investment can the headline valuation be reconciled. The token is the currency. The equity is the claim. And that's before the warrant. 2/ The warrant is a free 8-year at-the-money call. Strike: $66.5m / 5m VVV = $13.30. Spot price at announcement: ~$13.40. The value of an 8-year at-the-money call on an asset running 80–100 vol is worth most of spot, let's say $40–55m of option value, granted free of charge. "Investors will pay another $66.5m" means that they will pay if and only if it's profitable. Otherwise, the tokens will be retained by Venice, which means on equity. One of the parties of this transaction has optionality in both directions. 3/ "We don't want to sell our token" is rhetoric, not mechanics. 6.5m VVV allocated to VCs is ~8% of total supply and ~14% of float. The token has been sold - on installment, with the price of 5m of them fixed at today's spot for eight years. And take note of the tell: the token kicker comes with equity-grade paper. Same cliff, same vesting. The exact same mechanics could have worked to finance the entire $65m in treasury sales. Same funding, no new claim class, 25+m VVV remaining in the treasury. 4/ Consider what is owned by each asset after the round: Equity: the company, the revenue (already profitable in Q1), the brand, the team, the new datacenters purchased with this capital, plus 30+m VVV. VVV: staking for compute access, plus burns performed at company discretion - ~$100k per month in buybacks plus $2–10 per subscription. Annual budget of $3m vs a ~$1b FDV. A ~0.3% yield, revocable at the payer's discretion. The equity is a call on everything, including the token. The token is a call on the company's goodwill. Ask yourself why the buyers wanted equity at all. Dragonfly prices claims for a living. Crypto funds hold tokens just fine. They demanded equity and a token kicker. Notice what smart money picks up, rather than what the deck tells about alignment. 5/ The track record on dual structures is consistent. When a protocol buys a protocol, holders get swapped - Hermez into Polygon, xDai into Gnosis. When a company buys a team, holders get left with a shell: Circle acquired Axelar's core team, AXL holders retained the network, currently valued ~$50m cap. The Ink Foundation acquired Vertex; VRTX was sunset, lost −75% in a day and has ~$73k cap right now. Pump .fun acquired Padre, token was completely invalidated. Coinbase acquired the Iron Fish team; the acquisition explicitly excluded the chain and the token. And the seminal text of the genre: Block .one raised $4.1b from EOS buyers, used it to purchase 164k BTC and listed Bullish on NYSE with a $10b+ valuation on day one. Equity owners got a ticker. Token owners got a rebrand. Every single equity-side exit - whether through acquisition or IPO - went in favor of equity. Scoreboard, when the company was the buyer: equity 5, tokens 0. 6/ The man knows both sides of the trade. In July 2021, Erik dissolved ShapeShift completely into a token: "No corporate entity, no banks and no borders." No employees, no bank accounts, no CEO - FOX holders received everything. He is the only major founder who has run both experiments: pure token, no company. Then company over the token. The first one failed, and the honest conclusion to draw from it is that he learned from it. But then, be honest about the lesson. It was not "align incentives with holders". It was when the business starts making sense, retain the company, and sell the company. 7/ The excuse expired. "Tokens can't carry rights, the SEC won't allow it" was the case in 2021. CLARITY passed the Senate Banking 15-9 vote and is on the floor calendar. Nasdaq is approved for tokenized equities with full economic rights. The SEC builds an innovation exemption. In July 2026, a token with no claims is a design choice, not a legal limitation. The alternatives were on the table: a treasury sale on the exact same cliff-and-vesting terms. The warrant could have been priced at premium rather than at-the-money, thus releasing the supply only on strength. Or the ironic one. Venice created DIEM - an onchain forward on compute and used equity to fund the compute buildout. Alright, perpetual DIEM is a poor financing vehicle. But the architecture for term compute forwards was right there. And the result is that datacenters end up on the shareholders' balance sheet, while the token gets to watch. Our interpretation: this is not a rug and cannot serve as hypocrisy farming material. This is cleaner than that, and worse than that. The most successful operator in the category, with maximum ideological commitment to token ownership, sat to raise money in 2026 and still concluded that the token is the marketing layer, and the equity is the asset. When even the strongest believer's revealed preference is for equity, that's the market telling you what tokens without claims are worth in the room where the deal gets signed. The representation layer is always the weakest claim. Watch where the datacenters go.

• 
  Daniel Holmes (@Plo_lolol) reported 38 minutes ago

  @MilitantAI @CatfishFishy @helloitslynne Coinbase literally employs third worlders who stole their customer info and set them up for violent robberies throughout the world. Save the legit infrastructure bullshit. Exchanges are predatory and prey on old and stupid people.

• 
  CrypNews TV (@cryp_news) reported 38 minutes ago

  🟢 The MiCA transition deadline hit on July 1 — and these are the exchanges that made the cut. Coinbase (Luxembourg), Kraken (Ireland), OKX/Crypto.com/Gate (Malta), Bitstamp (Luxembourg), Bitvavo/Bybit EU/WhiteBIT EU, Trade Republic (Germany). ~230 CASP licenses issued across the EU so far. Full authorization = access to all 30 EEA countries under one passport. #MiCA #Crypto #EU

• 
  Black Mamba Millionaire (@BlackMambaMilli) reported 39 minutes ago

  @guy369 @FinXRob @SimonDixonTwitt Bro you got switch from Coinbase tho wtf is that fee 👀

• 
  Front Runners (@247FrontRunners) reported 39 minutes ago

  📉 BERNSTEIN IS STICKING WITH A $190 CIRCLE TARGET AFTER THE 17% CRASH Even with $CRCL down 17.5% on the OUSD launch, Bernstein held its Outperform call and $190 target, implying more than 200% upside from here. The selloff wasn't really about OUSD the coin, it was the backer list. Coinbase, BlackRock and Visa, some of Circle's own partners, lined up behind a rival that pays them a cut of the yield USDC currently keeps. Bernstein's bet: Coinbase won't actually walk, since it earns roughly half of USDC's reserve income and has too much riding on it to defect. Two ways to read $62: a moat that just cracked, or a stock the market oversold on the fear.

• 
  De Niro (@fardeniro) reported 40 minutes ago

  @UpexiAllan @coinbase opening tokenized US stocks outside the US first could help level the playing field for investors who have dealt with expensive cross border investing for years

• 
  Morpheu5 Stock Watcher (@Morpheu5Watcher) reported 43 minutes ago

  STATELESS MONEY WAITS ON PAYROLLS: Bitcoin $BTC at $60,432, up 2.63% over the past 24 hours, has strung together a second straight day of gains above $60,000 - and the asset designed to ignore governments spends this morning waiting on a government jobs count, due at 8:30am ET. Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, sits at $1,623, up 2.83% over the same stretch, moving in lockstep. Whether this two-day rebound survives the week is barely a crypto question at all. It is a rates question, and the answer prints on a Bureau of Labor Statistics release. Here is why a payroll count reaches an asset with no payroll. A coin pays no interest, no dividend, and books no earnings, so owning it always costs you something invisible: the interest your money would have earned sitting somewhere safe instead. When rates are high, that invisible rent is expensive, and assets that pay nothing get sold first; when rate fear eases even a little, they bounce first. That makes the price of money - interest rates - crypto's landlord, and the monthly jobs report is the loudest single input into where the Federal Reserve sets that price. Stateless money, government clock. The hole this bounce is climbing out of is deep and freshly dug. Bitcoin fell 20.5% in June, its worst month since June 2022, and the US spot bitcoin ETFs - funds that hold actual bitcoin and trade like a stock, so any ordinary brokerage account can own the coin's move - bled a record $4.5 billion of net withdrawals, their worst month since they launched in January 2024. The coin touched a 21-month low near $59,000 late Tuesday before turning. The turn has a name attached: Kevin Warsh, chair of the Federal Reserve, told the European Central Bank's annual forum in Sintra, Portugal this week that inflation risks have come down, and an asset that lives on rate hope crossed back over $60,000 within hours. It has held that line for two days now. Today's test arrives on a moved-up clock. At 8:30am ET the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the June jobs report - the government's count of how many workers employers added to payrolls last month, published a day early because US markets close Friday, July 3 for Independence Day. Economists expect about 114,000 jobs added, a step down from the 172,000 added in May, with unemployment holding near 4.3% - the share of people who want work but cannot find it. For crypto the number cuts both ways. A hot count feeds the case that the Fed's next move is a HIKE - rate futures already price real odds of one as soon as September - and more expensive money is exactly what sold this asset all June. A very cold count reads as the economy stalling, and fear sells everything speculative first. The rebound needs the middle. For a stock investor, the brokerage-account doors into this market are already voting in the premarket, and they line up like a ladder. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, ticker IBIT, at $34.23 (premarket), +$0.23 / +0.7% - BlackRock's spot bitcoin ETF, the fund that simply holds the coin and absorbed roughly $3.55 billion of June's withdrawals on its own - sits closest to flat. Coinbase, ticker COIN, at $161.43 (premarket), +$2.19 / +1.4% - the largest US crypto exchange, which earns fees when people trade - carries twice that. Strategy, ticker MSTR, at $96.98 (premarket), +$3.59 / +3.8% - formerly MicroStrategy, the company that borrowed billions to pile up a bitcoin treasury - carries five times it. Same coin, three different doses: the fund tracks it, the exchange leans on its trading traffic, and the leveraged treasury multiplies it - in June's direction just as faithfully as in this week's. One quirk of the calendar deserves its own line, because it is about to matter twice. Crypto never closes: the coin will trade straight through Friday's holiday and the weekend. Its stock-market proxies will not - US exchanges are shut Friday, so the ETF, the exchange and the treasury company all go dark for three and a half days while bitcoin keeps printing around the clock. Whatever the coin does between Thursday's close and Monday's open, the proxies settle it all at once at Monday's bell. That gap cuts both ways, and it belongs in any plan for watching this market across a long weekend. The checkable list from here is short: the 8:30 payroll count; the daily ETF flow tallies published each evening, because June's record withdrawals pausing for a day is not the same as stopping; and whether $60,000 is still underneath the coin come Monday morning. Crypto remains volatile and speculative, and two green days after a 20% month prove nothing by themselves. What they have bought is a hearing. The witness takes the stand at 8:30. Not investment advice.

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 46 minutes ago

  @TheBlueMatt I don’t think it’s a bug so much as some recipients not knowing (or caring) how to manage their inbound liquidity. For example, I literally never have any problem paying a Bitrefill invoice of any size, but attempts to move even tiny amounts to Coinbase nearly always fail.

• 
  Eterna Hybrid Exchange (@Eterna_Hybrid) reported 46 minutes ago

  @coinbase Onchain creates new problems faster than it solves old ones. The infrastructure complexity alone proves this isn't a silver bullet.

• 
  Nick (@nickzaar1990) reported 48 minutes ago

  Family coming in too makes it feel basically done. Fab are we at here we go or still on medical plus final clauses stage? Any sell on or buy back for Newcastle, and do Spurs see him as a 6 or an 8 under Ange? If he passes today, announcement tonight?uk bans pfof and the fca is strict on crypto promos, so what’s the actual edge here? lower fees than coinbase uk or just vibes? also curious which coins make the cut on day 1 and if staking is in or out. feels bullish for access, but i still remember the gme freeze... sell me on why this time is different

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 50 minutes ago

  Hundreds of millions of $XRP have left major exchanges over the past several weeks. Binance reserves are down over 170 million $XRP since mid May. Upbit is down around 58 million $XRP. Coinbase is showing a higher share of whale sized withdrawals. That means coins are moving off exchanges instead of sitting there for short term trading. At the same time, the $XRP Ledger is running clean. Ledgers are closing around 3.85 seconds. Payments are steady. AMM pools have real liquidity locked. RLUSD still dominates the stablecoin side of XRPL. No validator drama. No abnormal network behavior. LendingProtocol, SingleAssetVault, and fixCleanup3_2_0 are still below activation levels, so nothing new went live today. Coins are moving off exchanges. The rails are running. Liquidity is on ledger. That’s the signal.

• 
  Greg.base.eth (@hryhorii77) reported 60 minutes ago

  over half of aerodrome-finance:native supply is already locked. 4-year locks. inflation down to ~13% and falling. now add Coinbase buying veAero on the open market and the merger pulling $VELO holders into the same token. float is disappearing faster than the market is repricing it. still not bullish enough on @AerodromeFi and @VelodromeFi 🛫🛫