1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Kraken
Kraken

Kraken status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Kraken is a US based prominent bitcoin exchange operating in Canada, the EU, Japan, and the US, and the world's largest bitcoin exchange in euro volume and liquidity.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Kraken reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Kraken. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Kraken users through our website.

  • 64% Mobile App (64%)
  • 18% Transactions (18%)
  • 9% Login (9%)
  • 9% Transfer (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Kraken outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Hackney Transactions 2 days ago
Paris Mobile App 22 days ago
Bordeaux Transfer 22 days ago
Valence Mobile App 2 months ago
Stockholm Mobile App 2 months ago
Province de Liège Mobile App 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Kraken Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • 1lalo312
    La1o (@1lalo312) reported

    @krakenfx Converting that **** to SOL

  • satoshiheist
    Professor Satoshi.🕯️ (@satoshiheist) reported

    @krakenfx @krakensupport I didn't charge you for my time or expertise from my days at Deribit and ByBit but the rate for the 4 hours is $20,000 per hour. Not only did I help you guys but I organized a set of options traders each with 5-10yrs experience to also help you guys. You can pay in @fuegonft as I accept that as payment.

  • CaptainSteven52
    Steven Potts (@CaptainSteven52) reported

    @krakenfx I need to escalate the issue publicly on X and push them to take your case seriously. At this point, they seem far too comfortable leaving you without a response. It has now been since July 28 since they have frozen my account and I don't have the ability to send Bitcoin.

  • markmetaplanet
    Mark (@markmetaplanet) reported

    @krakensupport SO WHAT. IF KRAKEN AND ITS GARBAGE SUPPORT WAS ANY USE, ITS MISTREATED CLIENTS WOULD NOT HAVE TO SPEND WEEKS ATTEMPTING TO GET THEIR MONEY BACK. SHAME ON YOU DIGITAL SPIVS

  • THE_SIR_HOBBY
    Sir Hobby of Herts (@THE_SIR_HOBBY) reported

    @SpursOfficial @krakenfx **** Off with this squad numbers shite graphic.

  • BMess181
    Bob.DGB (@BMess181) reported

    @krakenfx Sell that garbage

  • UncleLinx
    Uncle Link (@UncleLinx) reported

    @grebby @krakenfx @privy_io same week, different brands, feels less like coincidence and more like one vendor's customer list got passed around. anyone check if kraken and privy share a support/email tool with trezor?

  • UKCryptoKing247
    CryptoKing 👑 (@UKCryptoKing247) reported

    @SpursOfficial @krakenfx TEMU TEAM Spurs. You'll be 2 NIL down by half time with this clown team.

  • Yaloush23
    Bear (@Yaloush23) reported

    @krakensupport But you can disable all functions for without being notified or how to resolve the issue.

  • cryptokrrish88
    cryptokrrish (@cryptokrrish88) reported

    @atitty_ @krakenfx please fix issue and reply please

  • DarkoMatrix
    Darko (@DarkoMatrix) reported

    @karthicrypto99 @krakenfx @inkonchain Bro i had every each role in discord All the guild role Somehow i can't enter in discord 😭😭😭 how to fix it?

  • Octokrypto
    Dr. Ocktopus (@Octokrypto) reported

    Crypto needs a renaissance. Persistently weak trading volume and insufficient buying momentum indicate strong overhead resistance. 2026 net ETF flows remain negative by roughly $4.8–5.4 billion, still working against a deep hole dug during May and June. CLARITY Act's path to passage has narrowed. The Senate shelved it before recess, and prediction markets now put odds of passage this year below 30%. All of this while stocks are at an ATH. Are we cooked? $BTC $ETH $SOL $KTA $LINK $CRV @coinbase @binance @krakenfx

  • thfclas
    luke (@thfclas) reported

    @JayAtwood5 @SpursOfficial @krakenfx i can say the team is awful and still hope we win lad, be quiet

  • ou812iou4sure
    6 of 9 (@ou812iou4sure) reported

    @krakenfx Going down in 5…4…3…2…1…

  • ohsnapthfc
    🤷‍♀️ (@ohsnapthfc) reported

    @SpursOfficial @krakenfx You don’t have to do number order again, it’s not too late to fix this

  • AgonW3
    JustAgon (@AgonW3) reported

    @atitty_ @krakenfx fix this

  • skyfall1425
    Skyfall (@skyfall1425) reported

    @krakenfx To cry 😢 of emotion… many problems to solve around…

  • xomorgan___
    morgan (@xomorgan___) reported

    @SpursOfficial @krakenfx yeah i should have known wtf is this

  • Anthony71163578
    Tony Ray (@Anthony71163578) reported

    @LeonidasNFT @krakenfx When will kraken support runes nft?

  • Shibain23980681
    LAO (@Shibain23980681) reported

    @krakenfx Sold immediatly this ****

  • Ai50916
    is time. (@Ai50916) reported

    I like @matty_charts , but, IMO don't fall into the trap of playing patty cake trying to sell bag and buy lower. There is a large bidder running up @Casper_Network $CSPR nice and slow on @krakenfx .The question is, who. My guess is TradFi player/s.

  • eastybabes
    Lord Snooty (@eastybabes) reported

    @SpursOfficial @krakenfx What the holy ****! Richarlison!!

  • PhillyHotspur
    RMacs (@PhillyHotspur) reported

    @biggsdean @SpursOfficial @krakenfx Nice call Dean. How that first half work out ?? Terrible

  • ecofragrances
    xxxx (@ecofragrances) reported

    @RektInk @inkonchain @krakenfx You re the worse you never come back piece of ****

  • Yinielin
    John Collins (@Yinielin) reported

    @krakenfx Contact customer service wirh you guys. Oh. You give it to me? Say thank you.

  • klm99117
    kIm (@klm99117) reported

    @krakenfx Its Soo bad ur website don't work

  • dang_duytan
    GodAir (@dang_duytan) reported

    @RJShahinMahmud1 @krakenfx Interesting to see the exchange migration support.

  • Jp_Otpyrc
    Jp (@Jp_Otpyrc) reported

    @krakensupport Hello, ticket 22265762 always pending for several days. Always resctrictions, no news / informations from the support, no email received, and always the deposit not credited 😕😔… Thank you very much for your help…

  • StAnSaHa89
    YHWH is KING #KASPA (@StAnSaHa89) reported

    @krakenfx help my colombian people :( rebuild

  • LorenzoARK
    Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported

    Why @HyperliquidX Should Acquire Gemini: The Regulated HIP-3/4 Deployer in the US Hyperliquid is engaging with the CFTC/SEC to enable U.S.-regulated companies to offer perpetual futures that trade and settle on its public blockchain. I think Hyperliquid should take that ambition one step further: Acquire a regulated U.S. platform like Gemini and turn it into the de facto regulated HIP-3 and HIP-4 venue in the U.S. Gemini went public in September 2025 at a $3.3B valuation. Today, it trades at roughly $450M, down more than 85% from its IPO valuation. The core business is clearly struggling. Gemini is too small to compete effectively with the major U.S. exchanges for spot or derivatives flow. It has no meaningful liquidity moat and limited crypto-native distribution. The company has already started diversifying toward its credit card and prediction markets businesses. More telling is that Gemini is in outright shrinking mode. It has wound down its UK, EU, and Australia operations, cut headcount roughly 40% from peak to about 402 employees, and guided to lower compensation and technology spend for the year. Assets on platform fell from $18.2B to $8.4B year over year and spot volume dropped 66%. This is a company retreating to its core and cutting burn. But what looks like a challenged standalone business could be a strategic asset at a fire-sale price. For roughly $450M, Hyperliquid could acquire Gemini's entire U.S. regulatory stack, which I think could be worth ~$200M on its own: - NYDFS Trust Charter: custody + New York exchange authority (2015) - DCM: Gemini Titan, CFTC-regulated derivatives venue (Dec. 2025) - DCO: Gemini Olympus, CFTC clearing license (Apr. 2026) - FCM: in progress, completing the CFTC derivatives stack - MTLs: money-transmitter licenses across nearly all U.S. states - Broker-dealer: rails for regulated equities For context, @krakenfx's parent paid up to $550M for Bitnomial, effectively acquiring a regulatory and derivatives infrastructure asset with little operating business attached. Gemini's entire market cap is now below that. Yes, Hyperliquid would inherit a business currently losing roughly $30–40M per quarter operationally. But it would also acquire a meaningful operating footprint: - 580K monthly transacting users (Q2'26) - 1.72M lifetime transacting users - $8.4B of assets on platform - $3.8B quarterly spot volume - $3.1B institutional / -= $0.7B retail - $45.5M quarterly revenue, or ~$180M annualized - 106K active card users - ~$485M quarterly card spend and ~$220M of receivables - A regulated prediction-markets business with 27K+ traders and 225M+ contracts since launch At a $450M valuation, that's roughly $290 per funded customer. For comparison, @Robinhoodapp paid roughly $400 per funded customer for Bitstamp, despite acquiring about half the revenue and no comparable U.S. federal license stack. Kraken paid roughly $790 per funded user for NinjaTrader. And Gemini's users already hold an average of roughly $14.5K of assets on platform. In other words, you could argue that the regulatory stack alone goes a long way toward underwriting the purchase price, while the users, assets, revenue, card business, and prediction markets come on top. The most interesting part is that Hyperliquid could potentially finance the acquisition without touching a single burned HYPE token. The community reserve holds roughly 389M HYPE. Spending ~7.9M HYPE at $70 would represent approximately $550M — just 2.0% of the reserve, under 1% of max supply, and roughly 3% of HYPE's ~$18.5B circulating market cap — enough to acquire Gemini outright at a ~20% premium to its current market cap. Hyperliquid could then redirect a portion of protocol buybacks toward rebuilding the reserve. At the current fee run rate, the reserve could potentially be replenished within 12–18 months. The strategic logic is bigger than simply buying an exchange. Hyperliquid would be buying the regulatory bridge between HIP-3/4 and the U.S. market. Gemini could become one of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets, the regulated U.S. deployer, handling KYC, custody, fiat rails, brokerage, clearing, and compliance while the L1 provides the underlying market infrastructure, liquidity, and onchain settlement. Mechanically, this transaction is far simpler than most public-company M&A. Gemini's dual-class structure gives Class B shares ten votes each, and the Winklevoss twins hold all of them, roughly 94.7% of total voting power. It is a Nasdaq-designated controlled company. There is no proxy fight, no activist interloper, no drawn-out process. Board approval and a majority of voting power both run through two people. The entire negotiation is whether Cameron and Tyler want to convert a controlling stake in a declining exchange into a meaningful HYPE position and the distinction of bringing Hyperliquid onshore. On structure, the buyer wouldn't be the protocol or the foundation directly. NYDFS probabl wants a US entity with named officers, not an offshore foundation. The path is a Delaware HoldCo, funded by the Hyper Foundation but legally distinct, that acquires Gemini and keeps the regulated subsidiaries intact. The L1 stays a separate permissionless layer that never touches a US customer. Polymarket already ran this playbook. Offshore, non-KYC, with a CFTC settlement on its record, it bought QCEX (a licensed DCM/DCO) for $112M in July 2025, ring-fenced it as a US entity, and relaunched onshore in December. Hyperliquid starts from a better position: no enforcement history, US users geofenced, and active dialogue with both agencies. Hyperliquid generates substantial cash flow and sits on an enormous treasury. It should be much more aggressive about deploying both strategically. let's stop the buy back and burns and play offense.