Kraken status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Kraken reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Kraken users through our website.

• Mobile App (67%)
• Transactions (17%)
• Login (8%)
• Transfer (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Kraken outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Hackney	Transactions	1 day ago
Paris	Mobile App	22 days ago
Bordeaux	Transfer	22 days ago
Valence	Mobile App	2 months ago
Stockholm	Mobile App	2 months ago
Province de Liège	Mobile App	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Kraken Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CryptoKing 👑 (@UKCryptoKing247) reported 3 minutes ago

  @SpursOfficial @krakenfx TEMU TEAM Spurs. You'll be 2 NIL down by half time with this clown team.

• 
  Web3 News Wire (@Web3newswire) reported 8 minutes ago

  @custodiabank fight for Fed access just hit the Supreme Court. The Blockchain Association is backing the challenge, arguing regional Fed banks shouldn't have unchecked power to debank "disfavored" industries. Custodia's been fighting since 2020. @krakenfx already got a limited version approved in March. #Crypto #Banking #Regulation

• 
  Mide (@midedotsol) reported 10 minutes ago

  @atitty_ @krakenfx They should fix it frfr.

• 
  MilanX (@MilanX555) reported 13 minutes ago

  @krakenfx Selling that ****

• 
  Collin (@Collin482763231) reported 13 minutes ago

  @krakenfx Sell that garbage

• 
  Bitcoin Wizard - mavensbot 🧙🏻‍♂️ (@mavensbot) reported 14 minutes ago

  @krakenfx >open a support ticket. >explain that 15 ETH just arrived. >beg them to reverse it before i do something stupid. they can't. >i already have. it's in ethereum:0x72e4f9f808c49a2a61de9c5896298920dc4eeea9 now.

• 
  MarkQuarter (@MarkQuarter) reported 14 minutes ago

  $GOOGL $GOOG $BTC $ETH $LTC $BCH $ADA $SOL $XRP @krakenfx $COIN [ the Google Account was hacked for 3 months & that attack was able to pull the real Google Authenticator code in order to steal $BTC from an Australian Exchange: @google @sundarpichai will hopefully fix that ]

• 
  niccolò🩸✨ (@nicofailed) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Irv_AC @krakenfx you know damn well you wont do none of that ****

• 
  Will Adams (@BillyBoyLondon1) reported 16 minutes ago

  @krakensupport @krakenfx 2nd UPDATE - KRAKEN Account locked and can’t transact since 17th August. Ticket (#22367687). Not received any timeline or feedback on why account locked via email or app bot. BTC transaction on “pending” status since Monday night. Pls support.

• 
  king (@Kingisanoob) reported 19 minutes ago

  @atitty_ @krakenfx solve this issue man

• 
  cexscan (@cexscan) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @krakenfx @Gemini half a billion off trading and diversification while the rest of the shop bleeds out is wild. turns out building an actual financial institution instead of just waiting for the next retail god candle pays the bills. good problem to have when the sidelines are this quiet

• 
  Disdat (@gidrykhalil83) reported 25 minutes ago

  @CryptoEmpressX @krakenfx @krakenpro He is trying to suck u in. He will farm ******** out of it u will not even know it happened . GOSSIPATOR and crytp ro is a embarrassment to crypto

• 
  YHWH is KING #KASPA (@StAnSaHa89) reported 31 minutes ago

  @krakenfx help my colombian people :( rebuild

• 
  Bear (@Yaloush23) reported 32 minutes ago

  I got suspended today from @krakenfx @krakensupport @Krak without any notification can't withdraw neither deposit in my Kraken account. There has been no communication with me about any issues. I am very disappointed in Kraken been an active member since 2021.

• 
  Heafro (@Heafro_) reported 34 minutes ago

  @krakenfx Sell it get ******** out of crypto forever

• 
  Cyril (@idontknoowyet) reported 37 minutes ago

  @krakenfx Down payment of house

• 
  gallafta (@gallafta) reported 39 minutes ago

  @SpursOfficial @krakenfx Omg hell we need to close down on marmoush and savinho deal 😬😬

• 
  Danya (@danyapronin) reported 42 minutes ago

  Some thoughts on Nado and Ink No price calls from me. The market will handle that on TGE. What I like structurally: Nado has no token of its own. Points convert into INK, the token of the chain itself. For me that changes what you're actually valuing. You're not looking at one dex token, you're looking at a network asset with a real customer behind it. The backer is @krakenfx, one of the oldest US exchanges, around $1.7b raised, $20b valuation, IPO on the table. And yes, 'strong backer ≠ strong token' - is fair in general. But pre-IPO changes the math a bit. Reputation costs more in that window, especially in the US. Not a guarantee, but it is a real incentive 👌 What matters more to me is that Ink already has real flow, not roadmap talk. Kraken DeFi Earn went live in January and that USDC goes on-chain into Ink. It's money from exchange clients, not from the farming crowd. Different money. On the Polymarket odds > look at the volume on those markets. Tens, maybe a few hundred k. That is not the kind of liquidity you build an fdv take on. Not bullish, not bearish, just noise. That's my take on @nadoHQ I farm pts there and I trade there. IYKYK 🫡

• 
  Hira (@Hiraweb3) reported 42 minutes ago

  USDe from @ethena_labs landing on @krakenfx with a 4.5% yield sounds simple. but the interesting part is what sits underneath. the yield isn’t fixed. it’s driven by perp funding, which means it can move significantly as market conditions change. we’ve already seen funding-heavy periods push USDe yields well above 15%. now Kraken is packaging that exposure into something regular users can access without dealing with delta-neutral strategies themselves. the bigger question: how many people clicking “earn 4.5%” actually understand what they’re holding?

• 
  Robert Hughes (@sleepinggiant77) reported 42 minutes ago

  @SpursOfficial @TayoMello @krakenfx ******* so underwhelming. Horrible frontline. Defeat number 1

• 
  cryptokrrish (@cryptokrrish88) reported 45 minutes ago

  @atitty_ @krakenfx please fix issue and reply please

• 
  Will Adams (@BillyBoyLondon1) reported 47 minutes ago

  @krakensupport @krakenfx 1st UPDATE - KRAKEN Account locked and can’t transact since Monday. Ticket (#22367687). Not received any timeline or feedback on why account locked via email or app bot. BTC transaction on “pending” status since Monday night. Pls support.

• 
  Big ***** (@Salibasexual02) reported 47 minutes ago

  @thfc__zone @SpursOfficial @krakenfx Same problem as last year, where’s the creativity?

• 
  Someone (@SomeoneNor) reported 50 minutes ago

  @krakenfx fix my fking old car lol

• 
  Steven Potts (@CaptainSteven52) reported 51 minutes ago

  @krakenfx PID: AA77 N84G J73B QVPY. Why is my account restricted again? It was unlocked on August 12 with full abilities, then locked less than 12 hours later. Fix this.

• 
  piterskiy (@p1terskiy) reported 52 minutes ago

  @krakenfx Sell this ****

• 
  StickFiguratively🇻🇦 (@hxhenzoIIern) reported 52 minutes ago

  @SpursOfficial @krakenfx PLEASE STOP WITH THIS ******* NUMERICAL ORDER LINEUP BULLSHIT JUST DO IT THE OLD WAY **** YOU

• 
  🇮🇪⚪️🏆 (@THFC_fan7) reported 52 minutes ago

  @SpursOfficial @krakenfx STOP WITH THIS **** ORDER ALREADY WEVE HAD ENOUGH

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 58 minutes ago

  Why @HyperliquidX Should Acquire Gemini: The Regulated HIP-3/4 Deployer in the US Hyperliquid is engaging with the CFTC/SEC to enable U.S.-regulated companies to offer perpetual futures that trade and settle on its public blockchain. I think Hyperliquid should take that ambition one step further: Acquire a regulated U.S. platform like Gemini and turn it into the de facto regulated HIP-3 and HIP-4 venue in the U.S. Gemini went public in September 2025 at a $3.3B valuation. Today, it trades at roughly $450M, down more than 85% from its IPO valuation. The core business is clearly struggling. Gemini is too small to compete effectively with the major U.S. exchanges for spot or derivatives flow. It has no meaningful liquidity moat and limited crypto-native distribution. The company has already started diversifying toward its credit card and prediction markets businesses. More telling is that Gemini is in outright shrinking mode. It has wound down its UK, EU, and Australia operations, cut headcount roughly 40% from peak to about 402 employees, and guided to lower compensation and technology spend for the year. Assets on platform fell from $18.2B to $8.4B year over year and spot volume dropped 66%. This is a company retreating to its core and cutting burn. But what looks like a challenged standalone business could be a strategic asset at a fire-sale price. For roughly $450M, Hyperliquid could acquire Gemini's entire U.S. regulatory stack, which I think could be worth ~$200M on its own: - NYDFS Trust Charter: custody + New York exchange authority (2015) - DCM: Gemini Titan, CFTC-regulated derivatives venue (Dec. 2025) - DCO: Gemini Olympus, CFTC clearing license (Apr. 2026) - FCM: in progress, completing the CFTC derivatives stack - MTLs: money-transmitter licenses across nearly all U.S. states - Broker-dealer: rails for regulated equities For context, @krakenfx's parent paid up to $550M for Bitnomial, effectively acquiring a regulatory and derivatives infrastructure asset with little operating business attached. Gemini's entire market cap is now below that. Yes, Hyperliquid would inherit a business currently losing roughly $30–40M per quarter operationally. But it would also acquire a meaningful operating footprint: - 580K monthly transacting users (Q2'26) - 1.72M lifetime transacting users - $8.4B of assets on platform - $3.8B quarterly spot volume - $3.1B institutional / -= $0.7B retail - $45.5M quarterly revenue, or ~$180M annualized - 106K active card users - ~$485M quarterly card spend and ~$220M of receivables - A regulated prediction-markets business with 27K+ traders and 225M+ contracts since launch At a $450M valuation, that's roughly $290 per funded customer. For comparison, @Robinhoodapp paid roughly $400 per funded customer for Bitstamp, despite acquiring about half the revenue and no comparable U.S. federal license stack. Kraken paid roughly $790 per funded user for NinjaTrader. And Gemini's users already hold an average of roughly $14.5K of assets on platform. In other words, you could argue that the regulatory stack alone goes a long way toward underwriting the purchase price, while the users, assets, revenue, card business, and prediction markets come on top. The most interesting part is that Hyperliquid could potentially finance the acquisition without touching a single burned HYPE token. The community reserve holds roughly 389M HYPE. Spending ~7.9M HYPE at $70 would represent approximately $550M — just 2.0% of the reserve, under 1% of max supply, and roughly 3% of HYPE's ~$18.5B circulating market cap — enough to acquire Gemini outright at a ~20% premium to its current market cap. Hyperliquid could then redirect a portion of protocol buybacks toward rebuilding the reserve. At the current fee run rate, the reserve could potentially be replenished within 12–18 months. The strategic logic is bigger than simply buying an exchange. Hyperliquid would be buying the regulatory bridge between HIP-3/4 and the U.S. market. Gemini could become one of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets, the regulated U.S. deployer, handling KYC, custody, fiat rails, brokerage, clearing, and compliance while the L1 provides the underlying market infrastructure, liquidity, and onchain settlement. Mechanically, this transaction is far simpler than most public-company M&A. Gemini's dual-class structure gives Class B shares ten votes each, and the Winklevoss twins hold all of them, roughly 94.7% of total voting power. It is a Nasdaq-designated controlled company. There is no proxy fight, no activist interloper, no drawn-out process. Board approval and a majority of voting power both run through two people. The entire negotiation is whether Cameron and Tyler want to convert a controlling stake in a declining exchange into a meaningful HYPE position and the distinction of bringing Hyperliquid onshore. On structure, the buyer wouldn't be the protocol or the foundation directly. NYDFS probabl wants a US entity with named officers, not an offshore foundation. The path is a Delaware HoldCo, funded by the Hyper Foundation but legally distinct, that acquires Gemini and keeps the regulated subsidiaries intact. The L1 stays a separate permissionless layer that never touches a US customer. Polymarket already ran this playbook. Offshore, non-KYC, with a CFTC settlement on its record, it bought QCEX (a licensed DCM/DCO) for $112M in July 2025, ring-fenced it as a US entity, and relaunched onshore in December. Hyperliquid starts from a better position: no enforcement history, US users geofenced, and active dialogue with both agencies. Hyperliquid generates substantial cash flow and sits on an enormous treasury. It should be much more aggressive about deploying both strategically. let's stop the buy back and burns and play offense.

• 
  BraveX (@BraveX_DeFi) reported 1 hour ago

  @krakenfx Respond to my messages or your support chat