Is NatWest down in Burnham-on-Sea, Somerset, England?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
National Westminster Bank, commonly known as NatWest, is a major retail and commercial bank in the United Kingdom. NatWest offers current accounts, savings, investments, loans, credit cards and other financial products.
Full Outage Map
TransactionsProblems in the last 24 hours in Burnham-on-Sea, England
The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burnham-on-Sea and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at NatWest. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by NatWest users through our website.
-
Transactions (33%)
-
Website (22%)
-
Mobile App (22%)
-
Login (22%)
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
NatWest Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Liam Hogan
(@LiamJHogan) reported
@LKTranslator This is disgraceful! How will our prime ministers arrange a loan if they can't reward those who help them do so? Are they supposed to totter down to their branch of NatWest? I don't think so!
-
Rageof Reason
(@RageOfReason) reported
@natwestbusiness Is there a worse bank than NATWEST? I don't think so. I have 3 accounts with them but cannot make contact with any human being there. I will have to move my money to a bank that answers the phone! God help the rest of you because Natwest won't
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
Thank you, Paul — I truly appreciate your support. The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything
-
Rik and/or Roll
(@Slightlyonfire) reported
@redskyatnight The highstreet model chain Modelzone was still doing this in 2010. Most days it wasn’t a staggering amount but after a pre-Christmas weekend they would merrily send the Christmas temps down to NatWest to bank 10-15 grand in cash. They unsurprisingly went under a few years later
-
Lady Jasmine the European Cat
(@JeanneBartram) reported
@steviweavi NatWest were very reluctant to cancel this payment for me. I've never asked for it before ever. Nationwide told me that they had a lot of people with same issue. When a firm does this sort of thing, I never use them again or any similar schemes elsewhere.
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
Thank you, Paul — I truly appreciate your support. The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
What is the difference between the letter of the law and this judgment? The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything
-
Ahmed Al-Saleh
(@afalsaleh_al) reported
Share counts are going down at European banks. Very low market caps and significant capital return policies combine for payout yields (including dividends and share buybacks) in some cases near 20 per cent for national champion banks such as BNP, NatWest, ING, and UniCredit.
-
Crazybuttrue
(@Crazybuttrue101) reported
@MattGubba Yes and yes - it’s with the ombudsman now - RBS/NatWest. Been trying to get subject access since August last yr. so they are already in breach as they are totally ignoring it.
-
☆sadie☆
(@princesshawol_) reported
**** you natwest if you don't fix yourself in the next 30 min ...