Office 365 status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Office 365 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Office 365 users through our website.

• Sign in (60%)
• Errors (21%)
• Website Down (19%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Office 365 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Cheltenham	Sign in	2 days ago
Tewkesbury	Sign in	4 days ago
Edmonton	Sign in	7 days ago
Stratford-upon-Avon	Sign in	9 days ago
Bordeaux	Sign in	9 days ago
Hobart	Errors	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Vikash Kuma₹ (@ddpanchayat) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MSFT365Status Is there any issue with office365 admin center, unable to see the apps?

• 
  LSU IT Services (@LSUITS) reported 8 minutes ago

  ITS is aware there is an issue with users accessing Microsoft Office365 web services. Microsoft is aware that users are impacted & is working to resolve the issue. If you cannot access the web services, please use the desktop applications (Microsoft Outlook, Teams, Word, etc.).

• 
  Subhajeet Bairagi (@bairagi062) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Microsoft @Office Recently I purchased a laptop in which office365 was included for 1 year, I created an outlook mail and registered it but forgot the password now I am unable to access that mail and the office. When I try to login using the otp it says try with other method

• 
  T🌺M (@bigtallgay) reported 13 minutes ago

  If Office365 is down, I should probably just take the day off…

• 
  Nick (@maietta) reported 13 minutes ago

  @paul_e_jones No, I have zero business with GoDaddy. But I have to deal with them for an issue that they caused through Microsoft office 365's design. The problem is that a domain name that belongs to my client used to belong to a company that used to have a Microsoft office 365 account provided through the vendor. GoDaddy. GoDaddy sells office 365 accounts. What happens is a domain name previously used with Microsoft office 365 but then the account expires and is never renewed because the company that held the domain name went out of business and sold in bankruptcy. Two company transitions later and we acquire the domain. So we go to set up Microsoft office 365 only to be hit with a message that we cannot provision the domain on their platform because of a previous tenant that just doesn't exist anymore in the real world. That business vanished a long time ago.

• 
  BORDERS LAW FIRM (@BordersLawFirm) reported 14 minutes ago

  This is insane, frustrating, and, frankly, pathetic on Microsoft's part! I am a law firm, trying to buy a Microsoft Copilot Business license. Just one $30 license for the law firm. Nope. Blocked. It's not available to my account on Office 365 Markeplace, inside my Admin account [I am the global admin] and the block seems to be due to some technical issue between MOSA and MCA accounts. I have business premium subscriptions. They are making it DIFFICULT to BUY their already market-trailing AI. Maybe I should just spend all the law firm's money on ANTHROPIC. Mircosoft, get your **** together! @Office @Copilot

• 
  Herewegoagain (@Cryptlowani) reported 16 minutes ago

  @EvanLuthra What is going on with these tech companies just taking away more of our rights and charging us more to do so?????? Microsoft "updated" my Office 365 Home addition with the "New" version. Not knowing this at the time, I open up Outlook as usual and thre was the "New" version. Less functionality and unusable to me. I located the switch to go back to Classic toggle button, slid it over, and Bam, a pop-up survey appears asking me why I dont like the new version. So now I can't do anything, twice as much. I scroll down and hit the skip button, but it is grayed out. Next to it is the submit button greyed out. Now totally pissed off I start typing expletives into the survey form. Guess what you have to complete the form to skip it. I and now not just pissed off, exponentially, but also feeling like the smartest person on the freaking planet. I don't know when it happened but tech, just basic stuff, has totally gone into the toilet. How is AI supposed to run on top of this garbage?

• 
  Olav Mitchell Underdal (@omunderdal) reported 19 minutes ago

  @GoDaddyHelp This is a business critical issue. My @Office365 apps are not working, because there is a licensing issue where the apps do not recognize my valid license. I DM'd you an hour ago. You are welcome to call me.

• 
  Pythis (@Pythis1313) reported 21 minutes ago

  @darknesss932 An attorney should request a server level search utilizing Microsoft Purview ediscovery. I would wager they are using office365 for email which means that a query kql could be created pertinent to the case executed on the entire tenant for the time frames involved.

• 
  💯 Almin Ibrahimović MBA CGA FCMI CMgr CITP MBCS (@_almin) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Microsoft365 To use Scout, you need: 1. to be part of the Frontier Preview Program 2. need Office 365 Copilot Access 3. need local admin privileges on the device 4. your IT Admin needs to configure Frontier. 5. your IT Admin needs to configure InTune policy for Scout 6. your local IT Admin needs to agree to (attest to) and opt-in their organisation to third party inference paths. Note: "When data is sent to GitHub Copilot, M365 data residency, retention, eDiscovery, legal hold, Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Sensitivity and Confidentiality Labels, audit, SLAs, and the Customer Copyright Commitment do not apply." Here is why this matters: If 'AI' extracts a list of sensitive intellectual property or customer data from a labeled document and pastes it into a new response, that new response has no label. A user could easily copy and paste that text into an external email or a public generative AI tool without triggering any data loss prevention alerts. Regulatory frameworks require strict auditing of where sensitive data travels. Because the new content does not inherit the source classification, your automated compliance systems lose track of that data. The responsibility shifts entirely to the end user to manually classify every single output generated by the AI session, which frequently leads to human error.

• 
  Chris Baldassano (@Baldassano) reported 22 minutes ago

  Google has done some real wonky crap latley, Now, If you have an Android and use Gmail, it will no longer properly Auth to Office 365 accounts. Keeps asking for credentials. No fix of Yet.

• 
  Sree Shuadab Kumar (@ShuadabKumar) reported 26 minutes ago

  @DeborahKurata @Office365 There are many problems with your channel Deborah Kurata. I am a professional digital marketer and youtube expert. I am looking at your profile. Since you work in digital marketing, I want to connect If you need any service Please contact me.

• 
  Bɛrima Yaw Poku 🧠👁️👂🏾 (@barimayawpoku) reported 28 minutes ago

  @elliot_solution Ah, na government communications and emails koraa are running on office365 na documents. They don’t even have on-premise exchange communication server managed in house for data control and security seff. Tweaaa

• 
  BackwoodsSafetyMan (@Goard_O) reported 35 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales Will AI need Office365? If not, Microsoft will be in trouble

• 
  Matt Diebolt (@mdiebolt) reported 35 minutes ago

  @domster @bradgessler Our biggest are by far the ones that support our PowerPoint for Office 365 add-in. Places where you have a JavaScript API where it’s impossible for it to be managed on the server.

• 
  Dan Greller (@dgreller) reported 36 minutes ago

  @bretgreenstein @KarolCodes Agreed. Historically, things moved at a slow enough pace that there was ample time to reasonably estimate the cost of an associate's tech stack. The value obtained from that stack was self-evident, exceeding its cost. For example, no rational firm was doing an ROI on whether a new associate should have a PC or an Office 365 license. It was table stakes. In this new AI world, both the costs and the potential value are radically changing on a routine basis. It makes it that much harder to have sound and stable financial governance models.

• 
  chris (@xH4ngEm) reported 39 minutes ago

  There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

• 
  mRr3b00t (@UK_Daniel_Card) reported 40 minutes ago

  like for example: if you defend an org you will likely have: A firewall/VPN server A router/switch A cloud hosted web server Microsoft office 365 Maybe an Remote Desktop Services (or VDI) Service Your daily world will not be full of zero days exploding inside ur VPN server (unless you have a fortinet :P /s) these are rare events. You will have: Phishing/AITM attacks Scams/BEC Identity Dictionary/Brute Force you will also have malware etc. on box IPS/IDS/EDR alerts for behavioural type stuff (most of these are false positives) so software vulnerabilities on the edge in terms of volume will likely not be ur daily grind! identity will.

• 
  brugs (@Lightningkey17) reported 40 minutes ago

  @MicrosoftHelps my account corrupted when setting up i need a fix its saying it doesnt exist but it took a payment for office 365

• 
  Glich (@Glich) reported 41 minutes ago

  @yonann partly true. I work corp IT. A good part of my users whould be fine with a chromebook. All there work in in office365 and chrome. and this year our standard low spec model we issue increased in price 50%.

• 
  The Catalyst Edge (@zeatle2) reported 41 minutes ago

  Two very different setups. $CLOV (Clover Health) — not in today's scrub, but running off a REAL catalyst. 🟢 Medicare 4.5-star upgrade via federal COURT ORDER (court forced CMS to re-rate) 🟢 Covers 97%+ of members on Contract H5141 🟢 Higher star rating = higher CMS reimbursement rates in 2027 🟢 Q1 2026: GAAP profitable, revenue +62% YoY 🔴 Already up 18.9% yesterday — needs consolidation first This is a fundamental re-rating, not a pump. Medicare stars = real dollars. Entry: $4.70–$5.00 on pullback | T1: $6.20 | T2: $7.50 | Stop: $4.20 $MSFT (Microsoft) activity score 522 — #3 on the full scrub. 🟢 Enterprise AI Copilot embedded in Office 365, Teams, Azure — the deployment layer 🟢 Down 14% YTD = multiple compression on a franchise business 🟢 #3 scrub = institutional money starting to re-rate 🔴 ORCL's $40B raise rattles AI infra capex narrative — watch for spillover At $398, this is best-in-class enterprise AI at a real discount. Entry: $395–$405 | T1: $435 | T2: $460 | Stop: $380

• 
  Nick (@maietta) reported 45 minutes ago

  Holy **** GoDaddy is among the worst companies on the planet. Been trying desperately to get them to fix the issue with a domain name previously owned by another company who in the past, used Office 365. Now that my client owns the domain, we can't seem to get them to remove the domain. Microsoft support has been non-existent as well. They assigned a dude to the case, but then he dropped the ball and won't reply to me.

• 
  NorthCarolinaTrader (@NCarolinaTrader) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Marketintel_x @BrodyFord_ @business It’s crap. co-pilot’s worse performance is when you seek its assistance with other Microsoft software. You have better luck using Google to help with Microsoft Office 365 issues.

• 
  Ed Andersen (@edandersen) reported 51 minutes ago

  @matvelloso Yes their attach rate to office 365 is not great but the entire company is behind it. It’s not being wound down

• 
  Daniel (@dan325) reported 55 minutes ago

  @nonlinear_james @atalocke I’m using it to manage my work office 365 email right now without any issue. Not IMAP, either. It has native exchange capabilities. Also, WTF is wrong with IMAP? Evolution’s biggest advantage is it doesn’t tether me to a proprietary OS. No copilot BS on my computer!

• 
  NaN goto (@nmnvzr) reported 56 minutes ago

  @marcelhaasIO @MaxBrodeurUrbas @satyanadella All my accounts use the same email and sometimes different passwords. The average user does not know he needs to save the credentials as “azure login”, “office 365 login”, “exchange admin login”. Dude it’s a mess.

• 
  Windows Mgmt Experts (@WinMgmtExperts) reported 56 minutes ago

  Introducing Email notifications for "Issues in your environment that require action. Office365 #Microsoft365pdates #OfficeProductivity

• 
  AD (@AD1991234) reported 57 minutes ago

  @signulll I used to think MSFT was oversold, but I now think they have a major issue. Office 365 is not agent friendly, the OS is from a different era. Teams is a disgrace.

• 
  Nicholas Harris 🦖 (@_________4women) reported 58 minutes ago

  @DoWhatYouDo6 I thought they: 1. were serious about developing the next-gen XBOX console with AMD which was codenamed Project Magnus under the leadership of Sarah Bond. 2. the cost of RAM and SSDs skyrocketed so its specification was unaffordable and Satya Nadella quietly cancelled Project Magnus, but expected Sarah to lie to the community that they were still manufacturing hardware, to buy their engineers time to work on Windows 12 X and then have OEM bring out PCs that conformed to the Windows 12 X reference specification, that requires the AMD Magnus SoC which does Path Tracing. The initial spec. was 48 GB GDDR7 RAM which was probably for the dev kit, and since they are talking about using Neural Texture compression they might only need 32 GB for retail. However, this PC could cost as much as $4,000 and it would outperform self-builds that are $10,000 so that price, whilst unaffordable for XBOTs, is value for money for a consumer who is wealthy and could afford to buy more software, but realistically will tend to only play a couple of games (e.g. their Microsoft Flight Simulator, or Forza Horizon 6), so Microsoft need to get them through monetisation, although their real concern is to ensure a sale of Windows so that they don't lose customers of their Office 365 GroupWare to Linux business software, which could happen through SteamOS installs and not necessarily the Steam Machine itself. That is why Satya Nadella still bothers with gaming at all, because they need it as a Trojan Horse for their increasingly dog **** Operating System, which you won't notice is literal malware (spyware) because you spend most of your time in XBOX Mode that it lets you boot your computer straight into so the Operating System is kinda moot. Sarah Bond resigned because she had too much integrity to lie to XBOX fans. This pissed them off so she wasn't mentioned in their memo. 3. Asha was brought in by Satya to "acclimate" consumers on XBOX (on a variety of platforms and devices) to Copilot AI via the Gaming Copilot service. That backfired and consumers did not want that. Asha listened and "listening" characterised everything she did including Twitter polls to let fans choose: Xbox or XBOX and have a premature 25 anniversary showcase as they can't wait until 25th November 2026 to do that showcase. Maybe Phil Spencer will show up at an event in November and have a "rose tinted spectacle" nostalgic history of everything good that took place over 25 years (leaving out RRoD and DRM), but I doubt it. So, Asha was renaming Magnus to Helix with the justification it had Gaming Copilot integration, but it has lost that now, so what distinguishes it as a "project". It may be that she is talking about using AI to help port XBOX GDK code to their unified Windows GDK (so developers with PC make their games for Windows and there is no need to port what they make to XBOX or have an XBOX dev kit as the XBOX is a PC because Asha changed Microsoft Gaming to XBOX so all XBOX refers to is their games, services and microtransactions and not necessarily any console hardware at all). You then get the promotion of the AMD partnership at GDC 2026 and their commitment to Cross Progression and it becomes obvious that they are tripling down on encouraging their XBOX users with real money who are good customers who actually buy games (and aren't petulant whiny babies demanding all AAAs are Day One in GAME PASS and don't buy games through this service like Fatal Mephisto but rent everything for as long as it is available), to migrate to Windows 12 X. 4. Asha has said no one wants to pay $2000 for a console, so that led to speculation that they would imitate Google Stadia (only rent all the software/servers) and play on a Samsung TV without need of a console, but that requires an investment in racks of servers that need to be fully utilised to be economic, so unless they do something wild and buy Netflix my bet is on no next-gen XBOX console and expensive Windows 12 X PCs.

• 
  Steve Turner (@SteveoReno3362) reported 59 minutes ago

  @DeborahKurata @Office365 I had similar problems with MS 365 security..... finally had to give up and start new acoounts and just trust the old stuff (account) was inaccessible😟