AOL outages and service status in Taunton, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Taunton, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Taunton, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Taunton, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Taunton and nearby locations:

• 
  Sabina Ahmed (@sabaone) reported 26 minutes ago from Taunton, England

  What I don’t understand is I live in rural England, my broad band with @BT was abysmal, slow , problematic and hard to get customer service whereas when we had AOL for years we had no problem / good service and now @SkyUK since 2015, great speed / no problems. Same place!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rob Tammaro (@rtam24) reported 3 minutes ago

  AOL would never post this

• 
  Rusty (@isrustydotnet) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BuzzPatterson Yea, we tried doing a iMitchcall through AOL but it was too slow.

• 
  liberty91362 (@liberty91362) reported 7 minutes ago

  @brivael I worked at Time Warner for 24 years, and lost hundreds of thousands of my 401k in the infamous AOL merger that killed off the greatest media company in the world—the worst merger in corporate history. I mostly blame Steve Case and his other AOL cronies, who dumped all their stock right at the merger, while all the TW Execs and employees kept their stock and lost billions. I remember McKinsey’s empty suits seemed to be everywhere at Time Warner drying its death throes, and it always seemed like McKinsey helped orchestrate its collapse.

• 
  Abhishek Sharma (@abhi100425) reported 12 minutes ago

  Not every inbox shows it yet. Gmail, Yahoo and AOL support BIMI today. Apple Mail and Outlook are limited or still evolving. Setup is free. The VMC is the cost that actually stops most people.

• 
  👁️⃤merican Mafia (@FortunaDiem) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BasedTorba Remember when Zuck made Zader Fader for AOL and it still sucks *** to this day

• 
  SophiaPrieto&Roman (@Sophiaprie12756) reported 16 minutes ago

  Soph asked not to let the female that requested time to join have any contact. She’s a cam trail they employ to try to thieve come on, aol block: trap mac Lip her out of any service she may have wined her self into when she made out she wanted to switch sides and isolate anyone that worked a connector with. If she’s gen she will manoeuvre into a pos we can see she’s gen if she isn’t she wouldn’t risk putting herself there in the first place. Def o and deaf dumb and blind and attempt to limo to hit was worked from grok so we need to focus efforts to investigate the mill taps working through x social dig as a priority They haven’t got a mitt up df from what I can see as Eleanor and Rosso and cheap mill cook muk was attempted to be positioned to cover assault surf And we know they tried to swing a surf to try to put a come on in a brad Pitt to obstruct him helping. So isolate a few things out of there so we can reposition. As for the fight club. I’m done, guys so anyone in our side of chat know, we are definitly turning a table to couple deck elsewhere for a while. Mug any male his mark up worked with Matt and ghost the lot of them. We will set up a swing surf just wait for instruction

• 
  Trent Steel (@thetrentsteel) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Soaringeagle45 19 of 20. I never had an AOL email address. I was on the "web" before AOL offered internet access. (It was around before that, but not as an ISP.)

• 
  Laserkid is now an uncle! (@laserkidprime) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Tsukento Oh man I never did use the AOL site as I was a filthy Earthlinker, but I was in the Loudhouse as early as 1995 (under the same username hilariously I've kept it the same going back to 1994 and WBS Chat, also long gone)

• 
  Sandy Kory (@sandykory) reported 19 minutes ago

  I haven’t been buying the "SaaSpocalypse," but Q1’s nosediving SaaS valuations gave me pause. After a week in SF last month sampling the AI zeitgeist, I have a better feel for where the software sector is heading. It’s the SaaS-to-inference transition, and it’s good. My long-standing view has been that AI is a net positive for the software industry. It radically raises the ceiling for what software products can do. It should dramatically expand the market opportunity for software, just like the on-prem-to-cloud transition did back in the day. Yet many have been freaking out. After all, haven’t SaaS switching costs come down dramatically in SaaS, threatening one of the pillars of the business model? Yes, there’s no doubt that the “cement around the ankles” of legacy SaaS has weakened. At the same time, most legacy SaaS companies have barely scratched the surface of AI innovation while maintaining their historically high retention. This is how it played out in the last major transition: on-prem-to-cloud. Many legacy players (pathetically) ignored cloud innovation for 5-10 years (or longer) and still kept their customers. It turns out that technology is stickier than most in the tech industry believe. Take a look at Bending Spoons, which IPO’d off the back of buying crappy legacy products and jacking up prices because users didn’t want to give up their AOL email or Evernote notes. Tech industry people are not like this. They tend to be part of the very small minority of early adopters. Most people aren’t like this. Neither are most organizations. Legacy software isn’t going to disappear. But if pre-AI software companies don’t embrace AI innovation, their customers will be much less forgiving than on-prem customers 10-20 years ago. AI capabilities are too potent and obviously beneficial. What does embracing AI innovation look like? It means layering intelligent actions into all software. Historically, great software has helped users follow the right workflow. Now, great software must do the workflow by triggering agents to take actions. In other words, inference. The great news for everyone is that this opens the door to consumption-based pricing models that can scale exponentially. For legacy players and startups alike, delivering amazing AI-powered, agentic features is the way to get on the vertical-growth train. Remarkably, the door is still open for legacy players. Intercom’s 3.6b exit to Salesforce is a great example. Of course, new pricing models mean new margin structures. Just as SaaS had lower gross margins than legacy on-prem, expect consumption-priced inference to have lower gross margins. This is OK! We’ve already seen massive wins for inference-selling startups with negative gross margins, like Cursor. Legacy SaaS companies need to find religion on this. Dropping margins is never easy. Lock up the finance team if you have to. The priority is delivering AI-powered value for customers. Everything else is just details.

• 
  Ian Miles Chunk (@stillgh4y) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MorePerfectUS This dysgenic mouth-breather just says things for controversy. Remember he was the guy who became rich by taking Netscape IPO before it could even turn a profit and then sold it to AOL. His entire existence is the prototype for the Silicon Valley hype bro (i.e. Theranos, WeWork, etc.. would never be possible without his prototype) and if you don't hate him then you don't know him enough