AOL outages and service status in Taunton, England
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: e-mail and internet.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Taunton, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Taunton, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Taunton, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
August 20: Problems at AOL
AOL is having issues since 12:40 PM GMT. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Taunton, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Taunton and nearby locations:
-
Sabina Ahmed (@sabaone) reported from Taunton, EnglandWhat I don’t understand is I live in rural England, my broad band with @BT was abysmal, slow , problematic and hard to get customer service whereas when we had AOL for years we had no problem / good service and now @SkyUK since 2015, great speed / no problems. Same place!
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
PanoramaDan (@PanoramaDanB) reported@DrElectronX @RandyWKirk1 Major tech companies pre-dot-com bubble peak (late 1990s–2000): Microsoft, Cisco, Intel, IBM, Oracle, Lucent, Sun Microsystems, Compaq, Dell, HP, AOL, Yahoo, Apple, Amazon, eBay. If you wind the clock forward 10 yrs everyone of these except AOL lives on its own or was merged. My point is that most of the leaders in the tech industry would survive a bubble bust if it happened tomorrow. I saw the bubble coming and moved to cash befire the dot. com bubble, but I was scared out of the market for 10 years and missed the rapid rebound of the tech leaders. Timing a bubble is a fools game. Buy quality companies whose competitive advantages will endure in down times.
-
African$avage (@SHTOOPIDTHICK) reported@BankheadOunce lol and aol slow as hell dial up
-
CapeHeaven (@capeheaven) reported@AOLSupportHelp I keep getting marketing emails from an official AOL Email address, even though I have all my communication preferences turned off. Help.
-
Curtis Hallstrom (@VSOGunChannel) reported@hannahhill_sc @right2bear E-forms goes down on Wednesdays for routine maintenance. Do you remember the AOL commercials? “ you’ve got mail” That’s what it’s like in Eforms, without any aesthetic forward thinking
-
JOLTZ (@jrholtz) reported@AshleyInMKE I was born in the 70s and never had an AOL account because my first email was from my college and when I got out Hotmail and Yahoo were the bigger players. And while I've slept in waterbeds a few times, I always hated them and got terrible sleep.
-
🩸EmoFagLover🩸 (@Donnyboy_08) reportedI’ve tried every single number he has to date and his current number still lets me call but he never picks up. I’ve tried his email and aol. I’ve tried his first twitter account, I’ve tried instagram and facebook. I’ve even gone as far as to text him through a quest 2-
-
The Shotty, And Abigail Deltani (@TheShottyStrms) reportedFax machine: yup Rotary phone: seen, never used Encyclopedia: yup Floppy disk: I was an early 90s kid. Yes. Aol address: never had one but I think my dad did Record player: family had one Film camera: depends. If this is actual movie film, no. If classic roll of film you have to develop? Yes. Mixed tape: had a few. Phone booth: yes. Cursive: man it has been a long time but yes. Check book: yes. Typewriter: yes Dictionary: multiple times before Google was a thing VCR: it was how I watched the original land before time, secret of NIMH, and others. Paper map: yes. Waterbed: once Postcard: multiple times Walkman: wasn't that lucky Phonebook: yes. 17/20
-
Scottx70 (@scottx70) reported@CJGRISHAM Courtesy of Larry Johnson STFU Here is the heart of the problem. The Combat Logistics Force today numbers about 34 ships — a figure that has stayed essentially flat for well over a decade. On paper, stability. In practice, a slow hollowing, because the demands on that force have grown while its most capable ships have disappeared. Around 2010, the Navy operated all four of its Supply-class fast combat support ships. Today only two remain. In the mid-2010s the Navy inactivated two of them into reserve to save roughly $30 million a year each in operating costs — a decision that looked reasonable on a spreadsheet and looks indefensible from the deck of a hungry ship. The reason it bites is arithmetic: replacing the combined capability of one fast support ship typically takes an oiler plus a dry cargo ship — two hulls, two crews, two schedules — to move the fuel, ammo, and food that one ship used to carry in a single package. Cut the fast support fleet in half and every sustained single-carrier mission becomes harder to feed. The rest of the force is aging underneath the flat headline. The Henry J. Kaiser-class oilers that form the backbone date to the 1980s and are being retired faster than their replacements arrive. The new John Lewis-class oiler program is meant to recapitalize the fleet with some twenty ships, but the lead ship only delivered in 2022 and just one was fully operational by mid-2025. The Navy’s own newer answer — a smaller, more numerous “light replenishment oiler,” the T-AOL — does not begin construction until FY2027 and will not arrive in numbers until the 2030s. The analytic consensus across defense researchers is blunt: the logistics force is not enough, and not fast enough, for the demands now being placed on it.
-
Josh Centrum (@CentrumJosh) reported@Rajatsoni Calling XRP holders stupid while chasing BTC because it was invented first is hilarious. By that logic we should all still be using AOL and BlackBerrys. Tech history is littered with first movers that got passed by better technology. BTC has had 15+ years to scale and and hasn’t
-
JollyJoebean_VT (@joebeanclown) reported19 Never had an AOL.