1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Shepherds Bush
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Shepherds Bush, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Shepherds Bush, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Shepherds Bush, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Shepherds Bush, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Shepherds Bush, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Shepherds Bush and nearby locations:

  • pattif21
    Patti Fordyce (@pattif21) reported from Kensington, England

    @JackReganUK Even older than you: never had a MySpace account or zn AOL email address

  • dancall
    Dan Calladine (@dancall) reported from Wandsworth, England

    @neilperkin You'd think they could find a fix. This used to happen with all AOL accounts showing up as 'Virginia' 20 years ago!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • WhoIsVendix
    DEMediaIsPropaganda -TXIconoclast Apostle (@WhoIsVendix) reported

    @dom_lucre Smart People Never Trust Media CNN Worthless since apx 2000 When Bannon Brokered Sale. Maybe better under Time Warmer but CEO gone soon after insane AOL buy I schooled older but very green Bannon on need 4 Conserv media at HBS along w Defense Free Riding & China Threat

  • T00tbeer
    C (@T00tbeer) reported

    @WayneGunter8 @FrankenDjo Hahahaha oh ****. I forgot about AIM and AOL.

  • steveharvey2001
    Steve Harvey 🇬🇧🇨🇦 (@steveharvey2001) reported

    @AntiEVidiots When EVs were niche, driving one was like being part of a community with a shared secret. Similar to being on the internet in the early 1990s, before the AOL hordes turned up with their poor netiquette.

  • ShmuelLon
    Shmuel Londner 🇮🇱 (@ShmuelLon) reported

    Something about $BSP: they bought AOL at a 5x income before tax, which is optically cheap right? The small issue is that they bought it from Apollo and imho there's zero chance Apollo got a bad deal

  • RonShiley
    RonShiley (@RonShiley) reported

    @CitysideFiber Might be the worst service I've ever had. Regret making the switch. I don't think dial up AOL was as bad. The amount of interruptions is excessive.

  • YoYoHiku
    Yoyohiku🕹️The Arcade Dweller👾 (@YoYoHiku) reported

    @halenhargreevs I used to hate login into AOL or aim 😭

  • CapedBaldy667
    JasonX (@CapedBaldy667) reported

    @ToddVercoe @PoloniumTurd Delphi wasn't Internet, it was a walled garden service like AOL. BBS's weren't Internet either. The WWW didn't come about for end users till '91.

  • joeschwarten
    Joe Schwarten (@joeschwarten) reported

    Had our yearly apartment inspection. 2 Guys comes in does their thing. Looks at my monitor, "Damn dude, that thing is old, you run AOL on it?" Other guy, "you even old enough to remember AOL?" YG, "Yeah, I was born in 1997." Me: "Dude, that monitor is as old as you are!"

  • SledgeFeather
    Anthony D’Elia (@SledgeFeather) reported

    @MapQuest Mapquest so I need @AOL to use your service

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.