AOL outages and service status in Potters Bar, England
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: e-mail and internet.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Potters Bar, including 0 direct reports.
- The most common problems reported in this area mention E-mail.
- E-mail (100%)
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Potters Bar, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Potters Bar, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
July 14: Problems at AOL
AOL is having issues since 12:40 PM GMT. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Potters Bar, England
The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Wembley, Harringay, and St Albans.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
15 days ago | |
|
|
15 days ago | |
|
|
15 days ago | |
|
|
5 months ago | |
|
|
6 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Potters Bar, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Potters Bar and nearby locations:
-
Niamh Grimes (@NiamhGrimes4) reported from Goffs Oak, England@AOL unable to sign into email for last week. No response from customer services. No one to talk to either😡😡Absolute joke. Important emails that I cannot access. AOL can you please get on to this. Beyond frustrating.
-
Alan Walker (@ahwpgapro) reported from Loughton, England@aolmail I’ve been attempting to retrieve my wife’s AOL password for the past 10 or more emails with your supposed email support. Its merry go round getting nowhere. Please assist.
-
Angela Casey (@ElfinchickCasey) reported from Enfield Lock, England@sky_waller I scored one. I never knowingly had an AOL account. Don't you feel sorry for today's kids.
-
8/10 (@8outof10blog) reported from Barnet, England@reece_dinsdale The other two are "Welcome to AOL: you're connected!" and "Goodbye...th-that's it." Damn I need to put these on my new laptop!
-
Alan Walker (@ahwpgapro) reported from Loughton, England@AOLSupportHelp We have been going around in circles and the reason I’ve tweeted my issue is I can’t get anywhere because we’ve done all the security Q’s and still 0 - I need to speak with a human being.....
-
John Jansen (@thejohnjansen) reported from Camden Town, England@teleject @meyerweb It kinda does though... With MSN Explorer (yes that was a thing in 2001, competing with AOL) we enabled "toast notifications" and the name was because "the little thing popped like the toast on the screensavers." Real toast never does that. It sits there. It sometimes Burns.
-
Sarah Pilates (@sarahpilates) reported from Camden Town, England@1womanworkforce If he’s working from the aol ap I would delete it and reload. We had a problem with aol a while ago. The old Ap wasn’t working. Change the password just in case on your web version.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
SockbatReplica (@SockbatReplica) reportedThe funny thing is if you just cancelled your internet after the trial period AOL would just mail you another trial disk. We never paid for internet when I was a kid.
-
Gonz (@GonzoBeyondo) reported@walipini The first round of destruction was the free AOL trial CDs. Then came smartphones. It looks like AI will be putting the final nail in the coffin by serving as an uncapped sewer, spewing **** all over the place.
-
Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reportedWSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.
-
CaptainCodeman (@CaptainCodeman) reported@PrairieVeteran @MarkJCarney He's got ****-all deals anywhere. Oh wait, we got 10 months of Canola to China in exchange for them being able to sell EVs in Canada for 5 YEARS. He couldn't negotiate a free AOL CD.
-
Jacob Navok (@JNavok) reported1.) Buy company 2.) Leadership, strategy and priorities change based on market changes because market is not static 3.) Have bad takes about this written on twitter WB went from independent studio to Time Warner to AOL Time Warner to ATT to Discovery to the Ellisons. These things happen in business because the market changes.
-
mustard (@MustardFren) reported@gingertophat We'll blackpill tomorrow but tonight Tonight we whitepill Tonight we look back on how far we've come I been around since the internet was new...AOL ****...we've come so far my friend I promise you
-
Broken Souls (@BrokenSoulxy) reportedLike ****… 20 years ago I was decent bordering on cute …was I ever overestimating my looks so much I could justify being a total prick ? I did ghost my bf for being too excited to see me on AOL Messenger… for 8 months
-
🌮(((Stuart))) 🇺🇲 🟧🟦 I (@violinii) reported@SarahSevans2000 Never had AOL. Otherwise...
-
Rob Tammaro (@rtam24) reportedAOL would never post this
-
MichaelJensen1 (@_Kadmos1) reported@ERCboxoffice For the record, I don't side with various media mergers: If Netflix won in the above proposed merger, I would still oppose it. I tend to not be a fan of these media mergers. AOL TimeWarner should have not been allowed. Microsoft getting Activision Blizzard was a bad idea. SkyDance getting Paramount? Horrible. Disney getting 20CF? Stupid. Now, the 2006 Disney-Pixar merger I do side with. Disney getting Marvel and Lucasfilm? Wish the smaller 20CF got both of those companies.