AOL outages and service status in Plumstead, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Plumstead, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Plumstead, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Plumstead, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Plumstead and nearby locations:

• 
  Orrin Edenfield, an 🇺🇸 living in 🇬🇧 (@OrrinEdenfield) reported 3 minutes ago from Eltham, England

  @benjedwards school library had a dial-up modem (probably 9600 baud) to ISP through school district. At home was local ISP as AOL/Compuserve/etc. never had local numbers for me.

• 
  Tom Broad (@broad_thomas) reported 9 minutes ago from Bexleyheath, England

  @AOLSupportHelp hi we have forgotten our aol@password tried to recover it but can’t, have no recovery details set up help please

• 
  Steve O (@journeymanstev1) reported 17 minutes ago from Camberwell, England

  @Suvvo @AOL I’m having same problem… think it’s worldwide

• 
  Sarah Solomon (@xSarahSolomon) reported 24 minutes ago from Camberwell, England

  AGREED! Every kid except me had nice shiny internet...we were stuck with that shitty AOL dialup that we were only allowed to use to play Cartoon Network games on if we were good 🥴

• 
  James Freund (@jayfreund) reported 26 minutes ago from Poplar, England

  @AOLSupportHelp hi there having trouble accessing my emails at the moment , I’ve tried to reset my password and it won’t allow me to , could you help?

• 
  The Urban Kitchen (@urbankitchen) reported 31 minutes ago from Camberwell, England

  @ShikhaJainMD Actually got 2 - never had MySpace or AOL account!

• 
  Jonathan Richard (@JonRichard) reported 34 minutes ago from Bromley, England

  @yungcontent And Bebo never sells to AOL

• 
  Mic Wright 🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ (@brokenbottleboy) reported 38 minutes ago from Poplar, England

  When it first arrived — and I made a blog there within the first two months of its public existence — @tumblr was the near perfect blogging platform. Then AOL destroyed it. Now it’s a horrible jail where I can’t get rid of this dumb screen. Thanks @automatic.

• 
  Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported 53 minutes ago from City of London, England

  I was told by a rep ref. AOL: "it's a very old platform.." as if that was an excuse. If it doesn't work, they shouldn't take my money. @TalkTalk is a useless outfit too. I was called for months by fake Indian call centres after their data hack. My home internet sucks. @AOL @Ofcom

• 
  Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported 55 minutes ago from City of London, England

  Utterly useless service from AOL/Yahoo/TalkTalk yet again following my complaint reference the breakdown/failure of their systems. So irritating when you pay for a service and don't get it. I was told by a rep ref. AOL: "it's a very old platform.." as if that was an excuse. @AOL

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 3 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for sports-related stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

• 
  Huckleberry Hound (@HuntingtonHound) reported 4 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 Honestly never had an AOL address... but had plenty of their "free coasters".

• 
  Del Leonard Jones (@jonesdel) reported 8 minutes ago

  @chamath Frontier models are headed down the AOL road. The question is, when Anthropic and OpenAI fail, who gets dragged down with them? What companies do well? Nvidia? Hyperscalers?

• 
  Pops(Kevin) (@pitawolf037) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 Only 19 here. I never signed up for an aol account.

• 
  Kristopher Guillaume (@GKristopher310) reported 11 minutes ago

  I guess later on AOL I’m like nawh I don’t know if the same stuff on the internet I don’t remember. I’m like alright I don’t like I’m going give tou head type **** spontaneous and I’m not into it but all the time I’m horny by hugging or french kiss.

• 
  Arlo Gilbert (@arlogilbert) reported 13 minutes ago

  History tells us that the companies that are early leaders in a software category rarely remain so. Altavista? Excite? InfoSeek? You're old if you remember those, but at the time they were dominant. Then came Yahoo, then Google... Years later. AOL? EarthLink? Compuserve? They were the Internet for most users. Now? Telcos & Cable cos reinvented themselves as consumer ISPs and dial up mostly died. The historical examples go way beyond software. The point is that although OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok/X, Google are dominating AI right now, things change in ways we can't forecast. The next better faster cheaper different AI solution that erases some current leaders probably hasn't been created yet. I do wonder though, who dies first? I'm talking 5-10 year window.

• 
  Michael Morrell (@michaelmorrell) reported 15 minutes ago

  @immaterial_ink @solanamobile fully onchain chat protocol like aol instant messenger. pgp for dms. powered by memo program or something. biggest blocker is adoption friction i.e. getting it in an existing wallet app, and/or getting pkeys imported, and establishing a network effect

• 
  Gabriel Hale • #Sandman⏳ (@Gabriel_Hale_) reported 16 minutes ago

  @AOL I'm a european user and have had my account for ten years. This is enraging. Put the password bar back to login pages. @YahooCare @AOLSupportHelp

• 
  The Digital Archaeologist (@TheDataTomb) reported 16 minutes ago

  The only problem I have with X is that I never feel like I’m genuinely talking to people or replying/getting replies from real people. I wish it felt like the old days in AOL chat rooms where it felt like real people surrounded our conversations. It feels all botted and AI now.

• 
  StockCrusher (@stonksamiam) reported 18 minutes ago

  @grok why is your latency so slow compared to ChatGpt, Gemini, Claude, etc. I wait and wait and wait while you think. Reminds me of AOL dial up in the 90s.