AOL outages and service status in Newtonhill, Scotland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Newtonhill, Scotland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Newtonhill, Scotland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Newtonhill, Scotland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Newtonhill and nearby locations:

• 
  Martyn S. Clunes (@martyngnr) reported 42 minutes ago from Aberdeen, Scotland

  @IANdrewTheGiant Everyone else’s fault but his own. Meltzer is lying, someone else was booking, AOL/Time Warner undermined him etc etc. And Conrad never challenges him on the bollocks he speaks.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gietmof (@gietmof) reported 7 minutes ago

  @andrewc44104127 All of them. Only AOL I've never used.

• 
  Finish 🏁 (@0xFinish) reported 10 minutes ago

  EVERY BUBBLE HAD ONE FINAL TRADE THIS IS OURS The most overvalued market in 100 years and retail is still buying every dip This pattern has preceded every major crash in modern history not most of them, all of them Dot-com: the internet was real Nasdaq lost 78% Housing: real estate was real $8 trillion disappeared AI: the technology is real just like the others were The technology being real has never once stopped the bubble from bursting SpaceX just entered at $2.35 trillion with 95% of shares still locked and a wall of insider supply hitting the market on a fixed schedule starting in August Every bubble in history had one final moment the trade so exciting it pulled the last of the retail money in right before the whole structure collapsed Dot-com had AOL Housing had mortgage-backed securities AI has SpaceX Same ending. Different props. Turn notifications on - if you're not following yet, you'll understand why that was a mistake later

• 
  Dunno (@IconiciK_) reported 13 minutes ago

  Lord, these hoes be schemin', just to get some Neimans Just to get some Nieman's, so I be playing defense Nowadays these hoes want you to **** 'em and feed them Now we at the drive thru, I'm forever Piru I'm forever connected like AOL and Yahoo, okay True!

• 
  Sandy Kory (@sandykory) reported 14 minutes ago

  I haven’t been buying the "SaaSpocalypse," but Q1’s nosediving SaaS valuations gave me pause. After a week in SF last month sampling the AI zeitgeist, I have a better feel for where the software sector is heading. It’s the SaaS-to-inference transition, and it’s good. My long-standing view has been that AI is a net positive for the software industry. It radically raises the ceiling for what software products can do. It should dramatically expand the market opportunity for software, just like the on-prem-to-cloud transition did back in the day. Yet many have been freaking out. After all, haven’t SaaS switching costs come down dramatically in SaaS, threatening one of the pillars of the business model? Yes, there’s no doubt that the “cement around the ankles” of legacy SaaS has weakened. At the same time, most legacy SaaS companies have barely scratched the surface of AI innovation while maintaining their historically high retention. This is how it played out in the last major transition: on-prem-to-cloud. Many legacy players (pathetically) ignored cloud innovation for 5-10 years (or longer) and still kept their customers. It turns out that technology is stickier than most in the tech industry believe. Take a look at Bending Spoons, which IPO’d off the back of buying crappy legacy products and jacking up prices because users didn’t want to give up their AOL email or Evernote notes. Tech industry people are not like this. They tend to be part of the very small minority of early adopters. Most people aren’t like this. Neither are most organizations. Legacy software isn’t going to disappear. But if pre-AI software companies don’t embrace AI innovation, their customers will be much less forgiving than on-prem customers 10-20 years ago. AI capabilities are too potent and obviously beneficial. What does embracing AI innovation look like? It means layering intelligent actions into all software. Historically, great software has helped users follow the right workflow. Now, great software must do the workflow by triggering agents to take actions. In other words, inference. The great news for everyone is that this opens the door to consumption-based pricing models that can scale exponentially. For legacy players and startups alike, delivering amazing AI-powered, agentic features is the way to get on the vertical-growth train. Remarkably, the door is still open for legacy players. Intercom’s 3.6b exit to Salesforce is a great example. Of course, new pricing models mean new margin structures. Just as SaaS had lower gross margins than legacy on-prem, expect consumption-priced inference to have lower gross margins. This is OK! We’ve already seen massive wins for inference-selling startups with negative gross margins, like Cursor. Legacy SaaS companies need to find religion on this. Dropping margins is never easy. Lock up the finance team if you have to. The priority is delivering AI-powered value for customers. Everything else is just details.

• 
  🌺Patience Parker🌺 (@sweeticetv) reported 16 minutes ago

  @GoatR2_ I’m down let’s bring our AOL screen names too even though that don’t exist anymore more 😭

• 
  Seoul Man (@Monkey3ddd) reported 16 minutes ago

  @TheMorningSpew2 Maybe help her change her AOL password.

• 
  mustard (@MustardFren) reported 22 minutes ago

  @gingertophat We'll blackpill tomorrow but tonight Tonight we whitepill Tonight we look back on how far we've come I been around since the internet was new...AOL ****...we've come so far my friend I promise you

• 
  Will Huhges (@willhuhges) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Loganlovesgh Oh there are some real beauties out there. I haven't seen anything quite as bad as the old AOL soap message boards yet but it's only a matter of time!😩

• 
  💀Raiders4Life💀 (@TexicanRaider) reported 25 minutes ago

  @TattoosandSass 19...never had AOL

• 
  Dhruv (@dhruvakharia) reported 29 minutes ago

  The weirdest AI-era market signal today was not a model launch. It was Wall Street cheering AOL’s new parent. Bending Spoons, the Italian roll-up behind AOL, Vimeo, Eventbrite and other “old internet” brands, ripped on its first trading day. Shares were up as much as 52% and closed about 40% above the IPO price, according to WSJ coverage. That matters because this was supposed to be the era where only frontier AI labs and zero-to-one startups get rewarded. But public markets are sending a different message: if AI makes software cheaper to build, then existing distribution gets more valuable, not less. Users, billing relationships, search traffic, archives, brand memory, and neglected products with real audiences suddenly look like underpriced assets. The winners may not just be the companies inventing new AI tools. They may also be the operators buying tired digital properties and rebuilding them with AI, automation, and brutal cost discipline. Watch for more money to chase AI-enabled roll-ups, not just AI-native apps. The next big tech winners might look less like inventors and more like private-equity-style owners of forgotten internet real estate. Is this just an IPO pop, or the first real sign that AI rewards ownership and distribution more than novelty?