1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Lyneham
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Lyneham, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Lyneham, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Lyneham, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lyneham, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Lyneham, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Lyneham and nearby locations:

  • gerrylynch
    Gerry Lynch (@gerrylynch) reported from Devizes, England

    @SimonCatRiley Lycos. I remember when Lycos was the best. Then it was outcompeted by AltaVista. I never thought Yahoo was any good, even when it was the most popular one. And AOL's mega-intranet which seemed dated by 2000 but by now a strange precognition of social media.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • antibishonen
    Antibishonen (@antibishonen) reported

    @KevDGrussing Larry wants to control media so bad, he forgot AOL and ATT tried to do the same and failed

  • robin16633
    Robin Fultz (@robin16633) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. I never had an AOL address.

  • jpvanhoy
    The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported

    @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

  • ashkenahzee
    Khazar Theory Enthusiast (@ashkenahzee) reported

    @KayakZztee5 @tombelaviv_ At least he has a gallbladder and a mother. One who didn't die ashamed. One who didn't have repressed anger towards her son for being a useful idiot of the feds just like Jason Kessler and mentally ill disabled former employee of Oddcast and AOL. Sven is his new mommy. Evil mommy

  • rjcohen75
    Richard Cohen (@rjcohen75) reported

    @james_spir19274 19. Never heard of an AOL address.

  • GingerOwlIowa
    Altair (@GingerOwlIowa) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Had an email address through my college so I never needed AOL.

  • JohnRusnak
    John Rusnak (@JohnRusnak) reported

    @Irina_exh 19, never had an aol address

  • JaySick78
    Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported

    @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

  • gconsig
    greg consiglio (@gconsig) reported

    @jayyeh @bot @openclaw Just like AOL and the Netscape browser were exciting to people who never used IRC. Looks like the potential kernels of what can lead to mass adoption.

  • Matty_Laroo
    Matt Laroo (@Matty_Laroo) reported

    Such a weird time discussing AI with anyone who isn't super in the weeds right now. 99.9% of people who have been exposed to AI only know "chat", which in my experience is the worst current use case for AI (can be inaccurate, biased, too sycophantic, etc). Meanwhile, the 0.1% actually building **** (be it apps, businesses, websites, dashboards, slide decks, business plans, etc) or using it to help organize your life (translating "stream of consciousness" into readable notes, managing your inbox/calendar, creating a second-brain wiki from links, etc) is seeing where this is all going. Big difference is that the user (YOU!) have direct input on the outputs, whereas chat is just the delusion that you are getting correct answers from some digital deity (just a text version of brain rot, imo). It makes having conversations super weird, like explaining the potential of the internet to someone who only logged on to AOL to read/send email.