AOL outages and service status in Ilminster, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ilminster, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ilminster, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Ilminster, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Ilminster and nearby locations:

• 
  Sabina Ahmed (@sabaone) reported 10 minutes ago from Taunton, England

  What I don’t understand is I live in rural England, my broad band with @BT was abysmal, slow , problematic and hard to get customer service whereas when we had AOL for years we had no problem / good service and now @SkyUK since 2015, great speed / no problems. Same place!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  HobbyBroadcaster (@HobbyBroadcastr) reported 5 minutes ago

  @cultofmac ... and who remembers eWorld, Apple's service that ran software remarkably similar to AOL?

• 
  Hathor 🧘🏾‍♀️🧚🏾‍♂️🙇🏾‍♀️ (@btweet2all) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Masterji_UPWale @SKefason I have an AOL address that became a part of yahoo. Never been asked for extra storage

• 
  MackaToshi 魔鳳亜 (@mackatoshi) reported 12 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 20/20 Born in 1979 Used to record the top 20 countdown on tape Hell I WORKED for the phone book and used one of those AOL CDs on my home phone line. God it was so slow

• 
  foogiano (@leekdogolajuwon) reported 13 minutes ago

  She just can’t be shooting ppl in the neck pulling they feet out and the aol know wtf going on be woke

• 
  Bill (@cabtot33) reported 13 minutes ago

  @JabroniJeremy @ChrisArctor Why would fans need to know about it in order for it to have ramifications on the wrestling business? If it changed creative plans, THAT’S the shift in business. Regardless if every single fan was logging into their AOL account to read about it…. Are you slow?

• 
  GoldenP (@shitterr1x) reported 19 minutes ago

  @laurashin tech debt plays out different when you remember who got crushed by it before the mempool even settled Vitalik never had to watch AOL die in real time

• 
  noroi (@noroivfx) reported 19 minutes ago

  @AOL Bro fix yo app or whatever I'm not receiving any otp codes for an email recovery

• 
  Jeremy Lamb (@jeremy__lamb) reported 25 minutes ago

  Terrible word choice, I’m like your grandpa logging into AOL in 1999

• 
  MaidenViking (@MaidenViking_) reported 25 minutes ago

  @MattPinner_ 18 points I never had AOL adress (not american) and not used a checkbook, as by the time I was an adult (2000) it was not that common in my country anymore. And when I was a kid, most adults I saw, never used these. Only some business men. More common to use physical bankgiro.

• 
  Nintendo Prime (@NintyPrime) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Stephen_Agnew @TRIPSTER0 "Why is that weird." I've been on social media since social media was nothing but yahoo chat rooms and AOL Instant Messenger. People say and do all sorts of ****. BOTH IRL and Online. And what they they do, why they do it, that's on them. I have zero curiosity around it. Just because someone is talking publicly, doesn't mean I have to care. Like, I am friends with AndresRestart. But before we were friends, he was a fellow content creator. I valued his thoughts on content creation and his approach to making his videos - but before we were friends? Nothing else he said publicly mattered. Because I didn't know him enough to know why I should even care what he's talking about. "You should welcome that curiosity" I should welcome people questioning literally everything I say or do? All it makes me want to do is not say or do any of it. ", not shame it or be a **** towards people who ask you curious questions." So your questions are "curious", mine are "being a ****". Got it. "If someone asks you a question, just answer them." No. I don't have to answer anything I don't want to answer. What the hell kind of reasoning is this? Do you just answer everyone's question all the time? If you don't feel like answering - don't. You don't owe them anything. They are strangers on the internet. They couldn't be less relevant to your life. "Have a normal conversation on X" I argue normal conversations don't exist on X. Because if what I see is normal, I don't want to be on this planet anymore. "being defensive and being a jerk to them." Not only have your questions been answered, I asked questions in return. So I get it: You can ask me questions and if I don't want to answer it then but ask you a question in kind, and you don't want to answer it then - I'm the ****, you're the innocent bystander. If my post isn't asking a question, I am not asking for anyone's thoughts, nor taking questions. I do Q and A's for that. Commentary is just that, and people are free to disagree or not with my commentary. They are free to ask, or not questions. And I am free to answer those questions, or not. You seem to have this definition of "nromal" that is inherently "you must do what is asked of you because I said so". Nah, I don't. There is no normal. How I am behaving right now is perfectly, 1000%, considered normal among my friends. "Nothing you do here is your private business" lol "you do it publicly and so the public has a right to ask about your public actions" And I have a right to respond to a question, with a question. "Just give an honest answer and move on." I did. You didn't like my answer.