AOL outages and service status in Cumnock, Scotland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Cumnock, Scotland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Cumnock, Scotland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Cumnock, Scotland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Cumnock and nearby locations:

• 
  Brian Stalker (@LuckyNo_4) reported 42 minutes ago from Galston, Scotland

  @aolmail I am unable to open attachments through the aol app or on aol Web email. Is there an issue? I'm in UK

• 
  Robin Scott (@Spacemouse77) reported 46 minutes ago from Ayrshire, Scotland

  @aolmail good morning.. i seem to be able to get into my aol account , are there any issues happening at the moment .. regards Robin

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Akanni Of Lagos 🐺 (@2muchAkanni) reported 55 seconds ago

  This is professionalism at its best. The interviewer didn’t shout. He didn’t interrupt him and he didn’t over cook narrative to drive this conversation, his facts were based on some of the unguided statements made by Mr. Okonkwo himself before. He was very calm and concise. Nothing like I put it to you kini kan kini kan. He rattled him without making noise. You are a spokesperson today doesn’t mean you should talk anyhow (anywhere belle face), especially if you don’t have principles. AOL!

• 
  Pamela Lutes (@PamLutes54) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had AOL address.

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 3 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  Azure (@azuritess) reported 3 minutes ago

  @svnryn_ runyu swept him to the top popularity at that time, and because his data topped ML/FL, as support actor. He was cursed badly, called the famous ten days of slaying the dragon incident, he was even banned and dropped by the AOL official/producer. +

• 
  Anna’s Smile 👻 (@annaBeauty0) reported 6 minutes ago

  19/ Doesn’t that look a little like an AOL–Time Warner merger that never quite made it to the actual merger stage? An old-world giant placing a massive bet on a new-world leader in an attempt to inject new life into its own empire. Does that script sound a little familiar? Of course, history doesn’t simply repeat itself. Microsoft today understands technology far better than Time Warner did back then. And AI may have even greater potential than the internet ever did. The internet bubble eventually burst. But the internet itself survived and went on to fundamentally transform the world. So the real question today isn’t: Does AI have value? Of course it does. The real question is: Can the value of AI actually justify the insane prices, the enormous investments, and the expectations being placed on it today? And if it can’t, what happens when the bubble bursts? The answer may be hidden inside a question that very few people have seriously stopped to calculate: How much money is AI actually burning?

• 
  Altair (@GingerOwlIowa) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Had an email address through my college so I never needed AOL.

• 
  The Grim Rieper 🫡 (@RiepTide1999) reported 8 minutes ago

  @90sWWE WCW’s demise wasn’t just down to AOL and Time Warner’s merger. From the executive level to day to day operations to creative to talent, it was badly run with more people in it for themselves than the collective benefit.

• 
  Ara G. Gelenian (@BPVideoGroup) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18. 19 if the "film camera" is a still camera not a motion picture camera. Never had an AOL address or waterbed.

• 
  PPE (@planert41) reported 9 minutes ago

  The internet enabled "connectivity". All these isolated pockets of information and communities and people always existed before, but being able to connect them together with the internet was what created the huge marginal value. I think the gains falls into 3 general buckets: 1) Connecting/Aggregating supply and demand. People have way more choices now from both supply and demand side - Amazon, Facebook (for human interests/social communities) 2) Efficiency gains from better coordination - Amazon 2 Day Delivery. 3) Frictionless instant distribution - Netflix streaming movies into your home Everyone has been talking about who extracts the most value from the AI stack, and if you look at the internet it's undoubtedly the applications that did. The rest of the stack essentially became commoditized. So let's get back to AI. In the same vein, i think AI enables "intelligence". Before this if you wanted to build a website, you had to hire someone who had the "intelligence" or gain the "intelligence" yourself to build it. Now you just ask AI and it does it for you. Intelligence/Execution is now cheap. Everyone has an intelligent PHD who knows a little of everything working for them on their computer now. OpenAI/Anthropic doesn't feel too different than say AOL back in the day when it was the only way consumers could access the internet. Eventually people had alternatives and it went away although for the internet providers, AOL didn't necessarily provide "better" internet than its competitors but the frontier AI models could potentially. AI Chips/Hardware now don't seem too dissimilar to how modems/routers/optic cables were for the internet. It'll still be short squeezed in the short term, but we'll eventually get more alternatives and supply. Energy/infrastructure - Eventually ppl will build data centers in the middle of nowhere with energy supply and it'll be fine. There will be alternatives. So i think eventually all the value will accrue to the application layer as everything else gets commoditized? But what would those applications look like? One thought experiment would be to consider which companies/products couldn't exist without the internet. Everyone in FAANG could be considered here, so maybe the trick is to find companies that couldn't exist without AI? Walmart would still exist without the internet, but not Amazon. Amazon figured out how to give itself an unfair advantage with the internet. Google obviously couldn't exist without the internet. So what are the similar parallels for AI? Maybe something like Harvey? What could i do with AI that i couldn't before (besides coding?). Most things still just feel like marginal efficiency gains (besides coding), instead of completely newly unlocked capabilities. I could imagine like a personal AI health assistant that will give you the vitamins or cook personalized meals (via contractor) you need everyday based on your data. Or maybe like an AI home system that helps you schedule for maintenance/repairs without you needing to think about it? Perhaps the internet solved the distribution problem, so the bet should just be on companies who already have a lock on distribution like $CRM and bet that they'll figure AI out. But perhaps we still need more time for AI to play out to identify these potential long term winners. We still don't really know what we can actually do with AI yet

• 
  Greywulf (@Greywulf4) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh Never had AOL