AOL outages and service status in Coventry, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Coventry, England

AOL signals over the past 24 hours, with local activity from Coventry, England and nearby areas. The dashed baseline applies to service-wide activity, not to local outage confirmation.

• Service-wide signals
• Service-wide baseline

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Coventry, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Coventry and nearby locations:

• 
  fiona simpson savoia (@fionasimpsonsav) reported 34 minutes ago from Coventry, England

  @AOL I can send on My phone and see my new messages on the aol app ,but. Not Able to receive new messages on my phone .keep getting an account error message .help !

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Brett (@hvacguy) reported 5 minutes ago

  Remember growing up, pre internet. You only interacted with bad people by accident or bad decisions The internet added the bad people to your kids bedrooms, your phone, and your mind. I miss the AOL dialup format of the internet.

• 
  Oh, Sup Y'all (@OhSupYall) reported 7 minutes ago

  @NostalgiaFolder “Get off stupid AOL I need to use the phone!”

• 
  Victor (@gvictor808) reported 14 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Yes. Prodigy (Prodigy Interactive Personal Service) was a commercial online service that people accessed with a dial-up modem over regular phone lines. It launched publicly in 1988 as a joint venture of IBM and Sears (originally developed as Trintex with CBS). You installed their client software on a PC or Mac, the program dialed a local access number, and you connected at typical early speeds of 1200 or 2400 bps. Later they added faster modem support and, in 1994, web access. It was one of the “big three” consumer online services of that era, alongside CompuServe and AOL. Users got news, weather, email, bulletin boards, shopping, stocks, games, and similar features through a graphical interface—not the open internet at first. Startup kits sometimes even bundled a modem. The classic Prodigy service ran until the late 1990s; after that it shifted toward being an ISP before fading out.

• 
  Pixisass (@pixisass) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DrDaymarcus I did not know that AOL had dial up service until 2025. Sources?

• 
  Jeff Bohren (@JeffBohren) reported 19 minutes ago

  @brockpierson If you had AOL or CompuServe, you had to connect with a modem. At some point PCs shipped with integrated modems, but yes, I rocked one of those bad boys as well.

• 
  Friedmo (@_Friedman1) reported 21 minutes ago

  @StorchMoritz i truly believe eth doesn’t do anything. it’s slow archaic, it’s AOL imo. stablecoins and other tech can accomplish what it does

• 
  Todd AF (@BigTodd1776) reported 22 minutes ago

  @DavidShafer I thought @mapquest went out with AOL online, my bad...I do remember when cassette tape got feisty with Compact Disk for about 15 minutes, then they just went away. Bye Mapquest.

• 
  Amanda Rankin (@tigerbitewand) reported 23 minutes ago

  Catfish people I mean like for real they're scamming stupid people I'm not a stupid person on XP I could actually go into the register keys and pull out Trojan horses like AOL... It was not allowed on my computer it was not one of my emails Yahoo was... Anybody else recognize how

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 23 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  soph (@agentofsunlight) reported 27 minutes ago

  @rizcriz i got in so much trouble once in middle school for going on aol chat rooms LMAO