AOL outages and service status in Camberley, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Camberley, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Camberley, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Camberley, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Camberley and nearby locations:

• 
  Ultra Mugnus (@mkn1ght) reported 6 minutes ago from Reading, England

  @SJM1878 @AOL "PUT THE PHONE DOWN MUM I'M TRYING TO DOWNLOAD A PICTURE OF CAPTAIN JANEWAY IN THE NIP"

• 
  Paddy 🇵🇱 (@slavicking18) reported 17 minutes ago from Windsor, England

  I still have an AOL email address so never question my loyalty

• 
  anthony (@edgfrg) reported 28 minutes ago from Slough, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I’m trying to get into my email password help

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  strengthPlan (@strengthPlan) reported 9 minutes ago

  If you drive or drive a Tesla soon you will be obsolete You will be looked down upon You will be old school the old geezer that did not adopt new technology You will be AOL You will be MySpace If you don’t FSD you are blackberry #tsla

• 
  Michael R. Rambo Jr. (@DarthVegeta) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18 out of 20. Never had a waterbed; never had an AOL address

• 
  Fleetwoodzac76 (@Fleetwoodzac76) reported 15 minutes ago

  @nkhlday @MaxNordau @esaagar Saagar and the guy before him are not just talking about AI. They're saying the entire internet, going back to yahoo groups, Aol instant messenger and geocities is bad. Which is completely insane.

• 
  PPE (@planert41) reported 17 minutes ago

  The internet enabled "connectivity". All these isolated pockets of information and communities and people always existed before, but being able to connect them together with the internet was what created the huge marginal value. I think the gains falls into 3 general buckets: 1) Connecting/Aggregating supply and demand. People have way more choices now from both supply and demand side - Amazon, Facebook (for human interests/social communities) 2) Efficiency gains from better coordination - Amazon 2 Day Delivery. 3) Frictionless instant distribution - Netflix streaming movies into your home Everyone has been talking about who extracts the most value from the AI stack, and if you look at the internet it's undoubtedly the applications that did. The rest of the stack essentially became commoditized. So let's get back to AI. In the same vein, i think AI enables "intelligence". Before this if you wanted to build a website, you had to hire someone who had the "intelligence" or gain the "intelligence" yourself to build it. Now you just ask AI and it does it for you. Intelligence/Execution is now cheap. Everyone has an intelligent PHD who knows a little of everything working for them on their computer now. OpenAI/Anthropic doesn't feel too different than say AOL back in the day when it was the only way consumers could access the internet. Eventually people had alternatives and it went away although for the internet providers, AOL didn't necessarily provide "better" internet than its competitors but the frontier AI models could potentially. AI Chips/Hardware now don't seem too dissimilar to how modems/routers/optic cables were for the internet. It'll still be short squeezed in the short term, but we'll eventually get more alternatives and supply. Energy/infrastructure - Eventually ppl will build data centers in the middle of nowhere with energy supply and it'll be fine. There will be alternatives. So i think eventually all the value will accrue to the application layer as everything else gets commoditized? But what would those applications look like? One thought experiment would be to consider which companies/products couldn't exist without the internet. Everyone in FAANG could be considered here, so maybe the trick is to find companies that couldn't exist without AI? Walmart would still exist without the internet, but not Amazon. Amazon figured out how to give itself an unfair advantage with the internet. Google obviously couldn't exist without the internet. So what are the similar parallels for AI? Maybe something like Harvey? What could i do with AI that i couldn't before (besides coding?). Most things still just feel like marginal efficiency gains (besides coding), instead of completely newly unlocked capabilities. I could imagine like a personal AI health assistant that will give you the vitamins or cook personalized meals (via contractor) you need everyday based on your data. Or maybe like an AI home system that helps you schedule for maintenance/repairs without you needing to think about it? Perhaps the internet solved the distribution problem, so the bet should just be on companies who already have a lock on distribution like $CRM and bet that they'll figure AI out. But perhaps we still need more time for AI to play out to identify these potential long term winners. We still don't really know what we can actually do with AI yet

• 
  Randy Hudson™️ (@noonefollowsme) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh Only 19 because I wasn’t stupid enough to use AOL.

• 
  Lambretta (@LambrettaGP1971) reported 17 minutes ago

  @james_spir19274 19. Never owned a water bed but have lain on one Can't remember ever having an AOL address. Would have had the Aussie equivalent tho

• 
  Marianne Halcomb (@MRHalcomb) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never used AOL address

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 18 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  ✨Elleecat✨🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@goodwitch829) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh @bshepherd05 18. I’ve never used a phone booth, and I didn’t have an aol address. I’m really not that old, just grew up in the 1980s and 90s

• 
  AraNama Lea (@AlanaMarieGrif1) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 the only thing I never had was an AOL account