AOL outages and service status in Burnopfield, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Burnopfield, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burnopfield, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Burnopfield, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Burnopfield and nearby locations:

• 
  Chris Lisle (@CDLSoundAVguy) reported 2 minutes ago from Gateshead, England

  @SkyNews saw your article about yahoo being down today, AOL mail was also down most of today and it’s owned by the same parent company as yahoo

• 
  Dan (@DanielConnor17) reported 24 minutes ago from Annfield Plain, England

  Fkin hell somebody take a pen down to the AOL #safc

• 
  brett askew (@slimfarmer) reported 44 minutes ago from Lamesley, England

  @clivechilcott @ProagriLtd @AOL @nusuk surly this would be deal for you to promote, good work ethics,outside,good rates of pay plenty of students locked down twiddling there thumbs till September

• 
  Jane Dobson (@JaneaDobson) reported 56 minutes ago from Whitley Bay, England

  AOL Mail has been down all morning, can neither send nor receive messages, unfortunately.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  A.J. Perez (@byajperez) reported 4 minutes ago

  @ChelseaV @DegenerateTBone Is your AOL that slow you didn’t see my next tweet?

• 
  LStrick 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 (@LRanlo1) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RazorRamone76 too bad we can force them to hear the hooking up loop that was awful on an endless loop (AOL)

• 
  Time Capsule Tales (@timecaptales) reported 6 minutes ago

  On the day Michael Jackson died in 2009, the internet collapsed. The LA Times, AOL, TMZ, AIM, and several other major sites completely crashed. Searches for the King of Pop spiked to an insane ~4.2 million per minute. Google believed it was under some kind of cyber attack because of the sudden flood of people searching “Michael Jackson”. Twitter went down and Wikipedia crashed around 3:15 p.m. PDT.

• 
  Tai (@TaiSmitty2) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Holy ****!!! Does Netscape still exist too? What about AOL?

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 10 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Michael (@Michael_Psalm51) reported 14 minutes ago

  Yahoo email I get ads in my inbox and I can’t delete them Upgrade required to go ad free. Sucks Go back to AOL 😳

• 
  Currer Ellis (@ActonBell) reported 15 minutes ago

  @DerrickEvans4WV Can we just go back to AOL and dial up internet? Do we really need everything connected to everything…? I don’t think so. Let’s cancel this AI stuff.

• 
  Lobster Thermidor (@scenicresorts) reported 16 minutes ago

  There was an Internet before the internet. My parents bought an IBM PS1 from sears as our first modern computer when I was in elementary school. It came with Prodigy which was like a big BBS and a free trial of Compuserve, which I think was the predecessor to AOL, both ran on dial up. I liked compuserve better because it had chat rooms but it had some heinous bill by the minute rate once you exhausted the free trial. At 8 years old the only thing that occurred to me to do with this technology was to relentlessly and nonsensically troll the chat rooms until I ultimately got banned from the entire platform. Well, a month later my mom gets a $200 bill from compuserve (I blew well past the free trial) and she calls them irate. Apparently in this call she was told I ran up the charges and btw I was also banned. She couldn’t believe this so I guess she asked why I was banned and the rep told her I was spamming their chat rooms saying “I like big breasted women” which was apparently against their terms of service and they would not be refunding anything given my behaviour. Got home from 3rd grade that day to get quite an ear full about this. But I guess I get bonus points for being banned from the internet before there even was an internet. I still like big breasted women tho you can’t hold me down.

• 
  Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.

• 
  Salvo (@Salvo8284) reported 24 minutes ago

  @AYTOarchive Never saw that, but kept getting AOL CD's in the mail for ages.