1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Lamesley
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Lamesley, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Lamesley, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Lamesley, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lamesley, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Lamesley, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Lamesley and nearby locations:

  • CDLSoundAVguy
    Chris Lisle (@CDLSoundAVguy) reported from Gateshead, England

    @SkyNews saw your article about yahoo being down today, AOL mail was also down most of today and it’s owned by the same parent company as yahoo

  • JaneaDobson
    Jane Dobson (@JaneaDobson) reported from Whitley Bay, England

    AOL Mail has been down all morning, can neither send nor receive messages, unfortunately.

  • DanielConnor17
    Dan (@DanielConnor17) reported from Annfield Plain, England

    Fkin hell somebody take a pen down to the AOL #safc

  • charlton_comedy
    Aaron (@charlton_comedy) reported from Sunderland, England

    ******* Shit @SunderlandAFC what is going on with the AOL

  • tenchylad
    StuT (@tenchylad) reported from Sunderland, England

    Awful and that isn't a criticism of the kids , but more of the structure that currently exists. Not the infrastructure, as the AOL speaks for itself, but the coaching and recruitment model in places , needs a total root-and-branch reform of the way the Academy is managed. #SAFC

  • slimfarmer
    brett askew (@slimfarmer) reported from Lamesley, England

    @clivechilcott @ProagriLtd @AOL @nusuk surly this would be deal for you to promote, good work ethics,outside,good rates of pay plenty of students locked down twiddling there thumbs till September

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • JaySick78
    Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported

    @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

  • KathleenLenkeit
    Kathleen Lenkeit voted for Hillary, Joe, & Kamala (@KathleenLenkeit) reported

    @Sheldon_305 19 - never on AOL

  • steev5ten
    Steven Harris 💹🧲🇬🇱🇩🇰🇺🇦 (@steev5ten) reported

    @Irina_exh never had AOL

  • MADr0591
    MADr0591 (@MADr0591) reported

    @The_FJC Two of those I never heard. AOL dial-up

  • KathleenLenkeit
    Kathleen Lenkeit voted for Hillary, Joe, & Kamala (@KathleenLenkeit) reported

    @Weatherman1616 19. I’ve never had an AOL address or used AOL at all.

  • Fundamentals21m
    Fundamentals 🎲 🟥 (@Fundamentals21m) reported

    @boomer_btc @CitadelDaniel I had a joke that Primal was the AOL of Nostr but looking back it didn’t cause the network effect that AOL did. Both were UX quantum leaps -the internet was ready for it. Nostr not so much.

  • RDWareEsqu1re
    Roger Douglas Ware (@RDWareEsqu1re) reported

    @mariza_hofer Desperate people, don't **** with them. They can't be predicted in any meaningful fashion. Imo. I was tech support for the world's first chat based communities. AOL and Prodigy and V.B.B.S. I can say this I got catfished once, and a 17 year relationship was the results. Favour of god to your unity with an equal and opposite force. My dignity is all that keeps me from flirtatious decorum. Will be looking for someone of quality to refer to you for inspection.

  • KingStudebaker
    KingStudebaker (@KingStudebaker) reported

    @MapQuest Lol. People use this ap??? Let me get my old AOL account and login

  • RogerBa18178307
    Roger Baker (@RogerBa18178307) reported

    @Anu_Start__ This graphic is crap - still has AOL on it. If this is where companies started there are dozens of errors.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.