1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Birchington-on-Sea
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Birchington-on-Sea, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Birchington-on-Sea, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Birchington-on-Sea, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Birchington-on-Sea, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Birchington-on-Sea, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Birchington-on-Sea and nearby locations:

  • GertsenPR
    GertsenPR 🇩🇰🇪🇺🇬🇧 (@GertsenPR) reported from Canterbury, England

    @AOLSupportHelp I cannot get email on iPhone or iPad do you have problems?

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Charter_DG
    Charter.DG (@Charter_DG) reported

    @ToddVercoe We had aol dial up cd's and prodigy the first real forum was just starting up...thoug most people were not logged in and never heard of it. We didn't have a real Internet...

  • sailuh_dude
    Sailuh (@sailuh_dude) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had an AOL account but hit all the rest.

  • Greywulf4
    Greywulf (@Greywulf4) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had AOL

  • CapedBaldy667
    JasonX (@CapedBaldy667) reported

    @ToddVercoe @PoloniumTurd Delphi wasn't Internet, it was a walled garden service like AOL. BBS's weren't Internet either. The WWW didn't come about for end users till '91.

  • AlanaMarieGrif1
    AraNama Lea (@AlanaMarieGrif1) reported

    @Irina_exh 19 the only thing I never had was an AOL account

  • azuritess
    Azure (@azuritess) reported

    @svnryn_ runyu swept him to the top popularity at that time, and because his data topped ML/FL, as support actor. He was cursed badly, called the famous ten days of slaying the dragon incident, he was even banned and dropped by the AOL official/producer. +

  • betty_egg
    Betty Egg (@betty_egg) reported

    @gatorgar As an AOL internet baby, I must confess I never saw much of a point in books. In fact I learned the lion's share of my grammar and spelling from AOL chat rooms. I was never a huge fan of fiction (basically I never read fiction) and everything I wanted to know what on the internet. People have this thing still, like, "Oh, well if you don't read books, you're an idiot..." I've been glued to the computer since the internet started. I've been 'reading' my entire life.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • FirstRdBust
    1stRoundBust (@FirstRdBust) reported

    @Irina_exh 18 for sure, Aunt had a waterbed. I tried it, it was terrible, and I never used an AOL address. I was a yahoo guy. Still have it. I did, however, use those cds that gave you internet time.

  • NotNowAlice
    SJKNH (@NotNowAlice) reported

    @S_D_M_21 19, never had the AOL address