AOL outages and service status in Canterbury, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Canterbury, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Canterbury, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Canterbury, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Canterbury and nearby locations:

• 
  GertsenPR 🇩🇰🇪🇺🇬🇧 (@GertsenPR) reported 14 minutes ago from Canterbury, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I cannot get email on iPhone or iPad do you have problems?

• 
  Martine Louise (@martinegilbert7) reported 39 minutes ago from Minster-on-Sea, England

  I wanted salad and Coles law. Un fortunately service was Too s low. So in stead. I listened to Sheryl Crow also Cheryl Cole. Oslo a little simply red. AND blues boys. While writing my c.v. On my AOL A/C #rtitbot

• 
  Rose Gold (@RrmetroldRose) reported 50 minutes ago from Ashford, England

  @aolmail are you able to advise on problem with emails today?

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reported 5 minutes ago

  My candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain the difference to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL? Any arguments for Harvey that I can retort with?

• 
  Amanda Rankin (@tigerbitewand) reported 5 minutes ago

  Catfish people I mean like for real they're scamming stupid people I'm not a stupid person on XP I could actually go into the register keys and pull out Trojan horses like AOL... It was not allowed on my computer it was not one of my emails Yahoo was... Anybody else recognize how

• 
  AlexB (@tb_can) reported 7 minutes ago

  I was a senior in highschool and was talking to a girl a year younger than me. One time she spent the night and I turned my computer on and hacked the company her dad owned. I found her dad's signature in the payroll files and pointed it out to her. You could tell she was uneasy about it but fascinated at the same time. By the time I graduated I had received three letters from AOL asking me not to hack their ****.

• 
  CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported 7 minutes ago

  An early Polygon investor ran the comparison against his own position. Yat Siu @ysiu puts the value split at 90 to 95 percent to the application that owns the customer, with gas fees going to the chain underneath. Polymarket's private valuation is 8 billion dollars. Polygon, the chain Polymarket is built on, is a lot smaller. His analogy is the mid 90s, when AOL bought Time Warner and the ISPs were the giants of the moment. AT&T is worth a lot of money today. It is smaller than Google, Apple and Nvidia. Critical infrastructure keeps getting built. It stops being the biggest company in the room.

• 
  TylerSchlittPhotography (@Stormchaser_TS) reported 10 minutes ago

  @spann They still suck. They distribute your content and you would think something like it being on MSN or yahoo AOL different platforms like that would be a sale. Nope that is a partners and they give it to them for free so you make zero dollars off of it. I happen to me. Literally one of the worst third-party brokers out.

• 
  Lobster Thermidor (@scenicresorts) reported 10 minutes ago

  There was an Internet before the internet. My parents bought an IBM PS1 from sears as our first modern computer when I was in elementary school. It came with Prodigy which was like a big BBS and a free trial of Compuserve, which I think was the predecessor to AOL, both ran on dial up. I liked compuserve better because it had chat rooms but it had some heinous bill by the minute rate once you exhausted the free trial. At 8 years old the only thing that occurred to me to do with this technology was to relentlessly and nonsensically troll the chat rooms until I ultimately got banned from the entire platform. Well, a month later my mom gets a $200 bill from compuserve (I blew well past the free trial) and she calls them irate. Apparently in this call she was told I ran up the charges and btw I was also banned. She couldn’t believe this so I guess she asked why I was banned and the rep told her I was spamming their chat rooms saying “I like big breasted women” which was apparently against their terms of service and they would not be refunding anything given my behaviour. Got home from 3rd grade that day to get quite an ear full about this. But I guess I get bonus points for being banned from the internet before there even was an internet. I still like big breasted women tho you can’t hold me down.

• 
  FlandoCalrissian (@FlandoCalrissan) reported 14 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19. Never had an AOL address

• 
  Sakshi (@nt570) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ANI bad adverstisement for AOL

• 
  Alley AL (@BackAlleyAL_) reported 17 minutes ago

  @SouthernGo40189 @markasual5 @BadQualityMemes No it means you never used a computer pre google as in AOL

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 17 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.