AOL outages and service status in Barton under Needwood, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Barton under Needwood, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Barton under Needwood, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Barton under Needwood, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Barton under Needwood and nearby locations:

• 
  Tecwyn (@Huxman1) reported 21 minutes ago from Burntwood, England

  @AOLSupportHelp Hi I’m contacting you as of the May 26th I’ve been unable to log into my emails - please help

• 
  James Bailey (@James_Bailey) reported 55 minutes ago from Burton upon Trent, England

  @aolmail I’ve had you since the internet was invented. I know you need advertising as it’s not a service you can deliver for free.... ...but the new level of intrusion, irritation & inconvenience means you will lose users....such as me.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ragh Pandragon (@RaghPandragon) reported 3 minutes ago

  The truth is stranger. Long ago in the 90's there was still magic in the world every time you wanted to get on the internet you had to electrocute one fairy. Just one. Unfortunately disconnects were an issue. Slowly, one connection at a time, we fed all of the magic creatures into the gaping maw of oblivion to power our ICQ chats and AOL instant messengers. At least until Human Energy Update 3.9 Service Pack 2. Now every time you log in you just lose a little bit of your own soul, no fairy deaths required.

• 
  My Full Name is uh.. (@t14159) reported 6 minutes ago

  @brockpierson That modem is too new. It doesn't have any microphones. Go back to the source with an acoustic coupler modem. Of course, you're going to have a little trouble getting a working telephone handset and analog phone line. At least the AoL CDs will be easy to find.

• 
  Michael (@Mikehb1989) reported 11 minutes ago

  Aol Mail is so bad it won't even let you log out 👎👎👎#Aolmail

• 
  Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.

• 
  Paul Moore (@ftlpaul8) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AOL : WARNING - If forced to upgrade to paid subscription to “reset” password, you will not be able to return to “free” plan, even if you block future charges on your credit card. They charge you anyway. Call them: you hold for an hour. Then they say they’ll fix it, but don’t!

• 
  Billszmafia (@Babobooey) reported 12 minutes ago

  @fekdaoui @bot mine barely made it past set up before shutting me down for 7 days. "Bot credits" according to Grok. Grok Bot is is still in AOL dialup stage. Needs work and some tweaks badly. Save you money

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 14 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  SHAKSINGH (@shaksingh) reported 15 minutes ago

  I still remember how the entire anti-hindu gang had started abusing AOL over a non existent issue.

• 
  Steve Harvey 🇬🇧🇨🇦 (@steveharvey2001) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AntiEVidiots When EVs were niche, driving one was like being part of a community with a shared secret. Similar to being on the internet in the early 1990s, before the AOL hordes turned up with their poor netiquette.

• 
  DEMediaIsPropaganda -TXIconoclast Apostle (@WhoIsVendix) reported 16 minutes ago

  @dom_lucre Smart People Never Trust Media CNN Worthless since apx 2000 When Bannon Brokered Sale. Maybe better under Time Warmer but CEO gone soon after insane AOL buy I schooled older but very green Bannon on need 4 Conserv media at HBS along w Defense Free Riding & China Threat