AOL outages and service status in Ascot, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ascot, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ascot, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Ascot, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Ascot and nearby locations:

• 
  Paddy 🇵🇱 (@slavicking18) reported 51 minutes ago from Windsor, England

  I still have an AOL email address so never question my loyalty

• 
  anthony (@edgfrg) reported 55 minutes ago from Slough, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I’m trying to get into my email password help

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Herman, NXT social media legend (@herman_segle) reported 3 minutes ago

  @joshbmessenger @Ace109610 WWE Network would always crash, buffer and many times the picture looked like it was video being played on a dialup server like AOL.

• 
  Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.

• 
  Art 🇺🇲⚓ (@BeerAce73) reported 8 minutes ago

  @MapQuest MapQuest? Is that like AOL? Stupid *****.

• 
  Yttrium Rapier 🐀 (@YttriumRapier) reported 10 minutes ago

  I still use my AOL email address that I never bothered to replace (It seemed like such a hassle). Are they up to any crook ****? I hope not.

• 
  Integralmdvdt (@integralmdvdt) reported 12 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19. Never did aol.

• 
  Time Capsule Tales (@timecaptales) reported 14 minutes ago

  On the day Michael Jackson died in 2009, the internet collapsed. The LA Times, AOL, TMZ, AIM, and several other major sites completely crashed. Searches for the King of Pop spiked to an insane ~4.2 million per minute. Google believed it was under some kind of cyber attack because of the sudden flood of people searching “Michael Jackson”. Twitter went down and Wikipedia crashed around 3:15 p.m. PDT.

• 
  Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported 15 minutes ago

  @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 16 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Ragh Pandragon (@RaghPandragon) reported 21 minutes ago

  The truth is stranger. Long ago in the 90's there was still magic in the world every time you wanted to get on the internet you had to electrocute one fairy. Just one. Unfortunately disconnects were an issue. Slowly, one connection at a time, we fed all of the magic creatures into the gaping maw of oblivion to power our ICQ chats and AOL instant messengers. At least until Human Energy Update 3.9 Service Pack 2. Now every time you log in you just lose a little bit of your own soul, no fairy deaths required.

• 
  🌈Raphael D. Swift 🖤📷💜#MMIW 🎵 (@RaphaelDSwift) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ZOE_SEQNC @michellexotter It all went down hill when they let AOL out of their box