AOL outages and service status in Shiremoor, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Shiremoor, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Shiremoor, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Shiremoor, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Shiremoor, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Shiremoor and nearby locations:
-
Jane Dobson (@JaneaDobson) reported from Whitley Bay, EnglandAOL Mail has been down all morning, can neither send nor receive messages, unfortunately.
-
Ian Harrison (@Hag_SAFC) reported from Morpeth, England@andrew_hird @SunderlandAFC @England Whilst the 1st team lanquishes in the 3rd tier of English Football, having been on the verge of bankruptcy. The AOL has benefited all bar who it is supposed to, thanks to previous mismanagement. And the irony of watchn a relegation owing to shit keepers, whilst watchn JP in a WC
-
brett askew (@slimfarmer) reported from Lamesley, England@clivechilcott @ProagriLtd @AOL @nusuk surly this would be deal for you to promote, good work ethics,outside,good rates of pay plenty of students locked down twiddling there thumbs till September
-
StuT (@tenchylad) reported from Sunderland, EnglandAwful and that isn't a criticism of the kids , but more of the structure that currently exists. Not the infrastructure, as the AOL speaks for itself, but the coaching and recruitment model in places , needs a total root-and-branch reform of the way the Academy is managed. #SAFC
-
Chris Lisle (@CDLSoundAVguy) reported from Gateshead, England@SkyNews saw your article about yahoo being down today, AOL mail was also down most of today and it’s owned by the same parent company as yahoo
-
Aaron (@charlton_comedy) reported from Sunderland, England******* Shit @SunderlandAFC what is going on with the AOL
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Narratives Film | Research (@NarrativesFilm) reportedFor the desperate, diluted and delusional among both sides. Below is the latest News track on the Charlie Kirk debate reach. Dismal reporting, to say the least, which means claiming (by either side) “The Debate” had far reaching affects is factually ****; do do, crap, one massive dung heap, a crock of **** to be more visceral. ...Read it and weep (or, LYAO)! August 14, 2026: Immediately after ZERO coverage August 15, 2026: - Hollywood Life “Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson: What Happened at the Debate” - The Bulwark "The Charlie Kirk Murder Business Gets Its Crassest Spectacle Yet" - AOL "Owens 3/10 no evidence-based positions at all" - The Times of India “Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson: Inside the Firery Debate Over Charlie Kirk’s Murder...” - Hindustan Times "Who is Andrew Wilson? Did Candace Owens win the debate? 5 key takeaways as duo spars over Charlie Kirk" August 16, 2026: - Townhall “The Great Debate: A Logical Analysis of Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson” August 18, 2026: - The New Republic “The Charlie Kirk Grift”
-
Joseph Rider #Resistance (@JosephRider13) reported19 never used AOL was a yahoo man from day one
-
Scott Allan (@scottya2) reported@Irina_exh 19. Never had aol address
-
Ang•el / מלאך (@AngelCWilliams) reportedRabbis and Rabbonias Tell Us Eliyahu Kin Shepardic David the Prince Used Illegal AOL Punters To Harbor My Bad Boy Entertainment Account
-
⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reportedThis collided with AOL’s vision to own the future of the internet. Unlike today’s internet services that act as gateways to the online world AOL wanted to control the internet service itself — and also be the place where people spent most of their online time. Users came to AOL for: News. Entertainment. Shopping. Sports. Chat rooms etc.
-
Gee Glock (@Geeology101) reportedMy **** aol now 😪
-
Zaither (@Zaithos) reported@halenhargreevs Yes. I'm also sister got groomed on AOL dial up old. Was never allowed on a PC because of her.
-
Yoyohiku🕹️The Arcade Dweller👾 (@YoYoHiku) reported@halenhargreevs I used to hate login into AOL or aim 😭
-
Boni Blackstone (@BoniLBlackstone) reported@WWEBabes32 Next to Miss Elizebeth Sunny is THE saddest story in the business. Most downloaded babe on AOL one minute managing the Road Warriors- Next chapter she gets a 17 yr centence for killing Julian Lassiter (75 yrs old) vehicular homicide in Ocalla Florida -**** poster sad over this
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.