1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Kent
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Kent, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Kent, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Kent, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kent, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Kent, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Kent and nearby locations:

  • RrmetroldRose
    Rose Gold (@RrmetroldRose) reported from Ashford, England

    @aolmail are you able to advise on problem with emails today?

  • SpacemanCre8
    Spaceman - Andy G (@SpacemanCre8) reported from Ditton, England

    Can safely say that @AOL @aolmail @AOLSupportHelp have proved to have the worst customer service I have ever experienced. No way of contacting other than email, no acknowledgement that Mail account can’t be accessed, no way of resetting password. No help at all. Disgusting.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • FoalyReviews
    Foaly Pub (@FoalyReviews) reported

    someone get this guys Website posted or at grok for me... I'm getting this thing.... **** ADS that **** getting worse then the ad spam with all those ******* banner ad's those of us that remember the late 90's-00's and AOL days constant pop-out ad's if you went to the wrong sites

  • playstationfox5
    Mystiqueknight13 (@playstationfox5) reported

    @Nyaralot3p @hasanthehun Like an elder god your incomprehensible...ly stupid. Personally I don't get your last toward hasan. He's ugly, sociopathic, an idiot, and a horrible liar. He can't even speak fast. Ppl streaming him have to do twice the speed hes so slow. Hes the AOL of streamers.

  • nontoxicwrites
    nt | trilogy truther (@nontoxicwrites) reported

    @loadmeup you’re smarter than me ive been online since aol chat rooms and i will never, ever learn lmao

  • GKristopher310
    Kristopher Guillaume (@GKristopher310) reported

    I guess later on AOL I’m like nawh I don’t know if the same stuff on the internet I don’t remember. I’m like alright I don’t like I’m going give tou head type **** spontaneous and I’m not into it but all the time I’m horny by hugging or french kiss.

  • eeemas1
    eeemas (@eeemas1) reported

    @GlobeLife **** **** **** you and your ******* email spam ads on AOL

  • KM4OOS_EM71
    On Orbit Satellite 📻 (@KM4OOS_EM71) reported

    AOL Instant Messenger never needed a data center. I fail to see your point. Can I host a social media server? I fail to see your point.

  • ThePoopeye
    Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported

    How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for sports-related stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

  • mypostworldiary
    zee ₊˚⊹♡ (@mypostworldiary) reported

    i hate when older generations think gen z wasnt also actively using physical media/earlier internet too like **** off u AOL *** i see ur dentures falling

  • bennrudd
    bennrudd (@bennrudd) reported

    US is fighting 2 war. Ammunition depleted. Ukraine swallowed all weapons n US army never thought they taking Iran. That's y EM said AOL is an idiot. She shld capitalised on this issue. Y expect Mamdani

  • aerockrose
    andrew engler (@aerockrose) reported

    Robert Johnson explains the exit-timing test behind selling BET to Viacom. BET had gone public in 1991 as "the first African American company publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange." Then Johnson and John Malone "bought the company back private in '98." The question became: "How do we continue to grow it and at the same time create an exit strategy for Liberty Media?" Then the market gave him a signal. "AOL merged with Time Warner." "That was sort of the highest valuation for media companies you'd ever see in a long time." When Sumner Redstone called, Johnson's first answer was not yes. "I don't think it's for sale." "Maybe we'd like you as a partner." "But I'm not ready to sell." He sold only after the control terms protected the asset. "If they wanted me to stay at the company for the five years I was going to sign the contract, it had to be independent." "I would only report to Sumner or Mel." When I look at a sale, this is the part I care about. The high valuation matters, but the better question is whether the buyer, timing, and control terms protect what made the asset valuable. - Robert Johnson on FoundationINTERVIEWS