AOL outages and service status in Blackwood, Wales

Problems in the last 24 hours in Blackwood, Wales

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Blackwood, Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Blackwood, Wales

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Blackwood and nearby locations:

• 
  terry walton (@theterrywalton) reported 1 minute ago from Tonyrefail, Wales

  Victor Meldrew moment! Ordered a new oven from @AOL for delivery today. Given a 7.00am until 7.00pm delivery slot. Rang now will not be delivered until next Sunday. Not informed of anything. Asked the service department about what they can do to correct it! Nothing. Cancelled.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Michael (@Mikehb1989) reported 5 minutes ago

  Aol Mail is so bad it won't even let you log out 👎👎👎#Aolmail

• 
  Paul Moore (@ftlpaul8) reported 5 minutes ago

  @AOL : WARNING - If forced to upgrade to paid subscription to “reset” password, you will not be able to return to “free” plan, even if you block future charges on your credit card. They charge you anyway. Call them: you hold for an hour. Then they say they’ll fix it, but don’t!

• 
  The Watcher On The Web (@WatcherontheWeb) reported 7 minutes ago

  Oh... Just in case it hasn't sunk in yet AI being able to code as well as it does means that software as a product or service is DEAD AS A DOOR-NAIL It will probably stop twitching in about 4-5 years for most people, but expect some companies to hold on by charging subscription services until 25 years after they have become irreverent... See AOL for examples

• 
  Alex Goldman (@AGoldmund) reported 8 minutes ago

  I’m reading Kara Swisher’s book about AOL which came out in 1999, and the tone of the book is like “this is the biggest company in the world! Nothing will take them down!”

• 
  Jared (@NoMarginGuy) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SinaiLawFirm Just remember.. this is the worst these AI tools will be. We are in the AOL phase of internet development.

• 
  Jamie T (@jdtoelle) reported 10 minutes ago

  @FilipPanoski Solve your own problem if the best strategy. If that doesn't work then copy the competition. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Friendster > MySpace > Facebook AOL Mail > Hotmail > Gmail Hotbot > Infoseek > Yahoo > Google

• 
  Friedmo (@_Friedman1) reported 19 minutes ago

  @StorchMoritz i truly believe eth doesn’t do anything. it’s slow archaic, it’s AOL imo. stablecoins and other tech can accomplish what it does

• 
  Horus (@DoxxieDonut) reported 24 minutes ago

  @TheDrugMoney This goes back to the limewire/AOL music server debate. Like cable vs Netflix. You just don't know what you want unless you see it in front of you. You may not need everything you lay your eyes on but you'll enjoy ******** out of it

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 24 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Anthony D’Elia (@SledgeFeather) reported 24 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Mapquest so I need @AOL to use your service