AOL outages and service status in Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Problems in the last 24 hours in Tuscaloosa, Alabama

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Tuscaloosa, Alabama and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Tuscaloosa and nearby locations:

• 
  Robert (@kamelsllll) reported 4 minutes ago from Tuscaloosa, Alabama

  @NelsonM08327268 @AOL Idiot all the things that say have been fake stories. you been watching C-F-N to much LMAO

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Olivier Groot (@OlivierGroot) reported 6 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 18 but only as there was no AOL in NL and a waterbed is something I never understood

• 
  BoomKen (@Ken417063De) reported 11 minutes ago

  @PokeRestockApp @Pagan_GMR That was the first rule of the internet when AoL & CompuServe was sending the FREE cds to everyone & everything. NEVER give ANYONE your real name online there was even a PSA about it.

• 
  patrick 🏳️‍🌈 supports labor and palestinians (@pcarterwriter) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Dontcare1369 @jolandiiQ reaching out might be wise :) agent impersonation is a problem, and more than one agency has a warning about it. four agents i know of use aol addresses. one of them is male. <3

• 
  MissouriCowgirl (@mocowgirl15) reported 17 minutes ago

  For me, it's more that this person has spoken to me in 10 yrs then acted like I've never been on SM or the Internet before when I've on the Internet since I was 8 yrs in the infancy of AOL chatrooms and all the SM platforms. I'm well aware of how to post and my posts.

• 
  Strategic Ambiguity (@ToshCooey) reported 18 minutes ago

  @hecubian_devil We should have never allowed AOL onto it.

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 19 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  Fundamentals 🎲 🟥 (@Fundamentals21m) reported 23 minutes ago

  @boomer_btc @CitadelDaniel I had a joke that Primal was the AOL of Nostr but looking back it didn’t cause the network effect that AOL did. Both were UX quantum leaps -the internet was ready for it. Nostr not so much.

• 
  Fred Johnston (@JohnstonFredJ) reported 24 minutes ago

  @getwhatugive @LynAldenContact You’re collapsing the product and the protocol. BlackRock/MSTR make money if demand for bitcoin rises. Demand rises when access gets easier: brokerage accounts, 401ks, treasuries, Lightning, hardware wallets. Shrinking the buyer pool would hurt their bags. That’s the opposite incentive of “reduce access.” Early internet had AOL too. Walled gardens expanded the user base first. The open network still won because the protocol wasn’t owned by AOL.Same here. An ETF is not a modem ban. Anyone can still run a node, hold keys, and send sats. Institutions can offer a wrapper. They cannot revoke the chain. “Gemini agrees” is not an argument. The music-sharing analogy also fails: Napster was illegal and centralized. Bitcoin settles on a public ledger. You don’t sterilize that by listing a ticker.

• 
  Reason Ate Opinions (@Scott076973722) reported 24 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19, I never bothered with AOL except to use the free discs as coasters.

• 
  Dylan (@eatyellowsno) reported 25 minutes ago

  @captive_dreamer who ******** reads AOL