1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Richmond West
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Richmond West, Florida

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Richmond West, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Richmond West, Florida

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Richmond West, Florida and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Richmond West, Florida

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Richmond West and nearby locations:

  • stephen_neckes
    Stephen Allen Neckes (@stephen_neckes) reported from Kendall, Florida

    So tired….on phone with apple support for an hour and then aol support to resolve problem with email address ….still don’t know if it’s resolved!….crap!

  • lopez9388
    manuel r. lopez (@lopez9388) reported from Richmond West, Florida

    Again my last tweet I was interrupted from posting and it's draft was not sent: problems with my email passwords again, aol replaced two days ago for it had been seized again and now again it does not work correctly: my password not recognized but I could still see latest email

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • needtobuild
    Just an old Marine (@needtobuild) reported

    @theikigaiguy @amazon Yep, same thing day after day. And history will repeat. A company thinks it’s infallible, but lose one customer here another there. And it adds up. Before long they become Sears, Kmart and AOL. IMO; They will end up splitting shopping and prime off eventually.

  • gigi_rivera71
    Gigi 🇵🇷 (@gigi_rivera71) reported

    @BBfan4life4sure @Iwanthatveto They didn’t have HOH comps to save them or POV. They had to complete task and had to budget for food. They each had to vote 2 people that they wanted to leave each week. The people with the most votes I believe two or three were left for the viewers to decide banishment by calling an 800 number and voting. Live feeds were on AOL which was horrible. And they had live animals in the BY.

  • ludvanb1313
    JimDon (@ludvanb1313) reported

    @theamelia___ It would be all 20 but i actually never used aol...not once.

  • Jackez89
    Jackson Styles (@Jackez89) reported

    @theamelia___ 19, Australia never got AOL

  • Levans6081
    ☽ ☿ ☾ Leigh Evans 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇲🇽🎬📷 (@Levans6081) reported

    Pay no mind That’s been a popular internet bandwagon since aol boards Im old enough to remember the recycled rage garbage apparently Seriously though, if you find a movie too offensive to watch, that’s ok, the entire world doesn’t have to agree with you though, so calm it down

  • adarkercemetry
    high plains wizard (@adarkercemetry) reported

    It feels like holding for AOL support in 1994.

  • byajperez
    A.J. Perez (@byajperez) reported

    @ChelseaV @DegenerateTBone Is your AOL that slow you didn’t see my next tweet?

  • OhSupYall
    Oh, Sup Y'all (@OhSupYall) reported

    @NostalgiaFolder “Get off stupid AOL I need to use the phone!”

  • RaphaelDSwift
    🌈Raphael D. Swift 🖤📷💜#MMIW 🎵 (@RaphaelDSwift) reported

    @ZOE_SEQNC @michellexotter It all went down hill when they let AOL out of their box

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.