AOL outages and service status in West Palm Beach, Florida

Problems in the last 24 hours in West Palm Beach, Florida

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in West Palm Beach, Florida and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near West Palm Beach, Florida

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in West Palm Beach and nearby locations:

• 
  FL FOP District IV (@MichaelKelley9) reported 24 minutes ago from Palm Beach, Florida

  @repmattwillhite A. The end of the 9 weeks crashed the system? B. Some 8th grade hacker took them down? C. They didn’t pay their aol bill?

• 
  Jessica Janee’ (@jjburroughs_) reported 43 minutes ago from West Palm Beach, Florida

  I feel bad - but I CRINGE, H A R D, when l see Yahoo & AOL email accounts. #sorrynotsorry

• 
  Brad Nickel 🇺🇦 - Headed to Permissionless (@b05crypto) reported 53 minutes ago from West Palm Beach, Florida

  Reminder for later: Never have an event in West Palm Beach, Florida. There seems to be nowhere in this town where cellular coverage or WIFI performance is better than 1999 aol dialup. The convention center might as well not have any Internet.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Vernon Foster (@VernonFost13133) reported 6 minutes ago

  @GaryCollin37052 his tariff policy. His tariffs amount to the largest U.S. tax increase as a share of GDP since 1993 (Tax Foundation) , roughly $1,500 per household in 2026 (Tax Foundation) . Trade: the Supreme Court ruled he couldn't impose tariffs under emergency powers (aol) , but he's kept

• 
  Jzell2285 (@jzell2285) reported 7 minutes ago

  @doc_1029 @KickRocks2026 I agree with you. I got to say, though...Years ago. AOL was the king. And I was involved w an online game. N I got to tell u the two techie guys would argue every week during n after our missions I loved watching them argue. Some kind of voyeurism issue I don't know. But I got a kick out of it

• 
  tonnaree🦄🐝🍑 🌈🙃(she/her) Pro-Choice (@tonnaree) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 17. Never was on AOL

• 
  Michael Strong (@flowidealism) reported 9 minutes ago

  I remember being excited by Google and its clean interface and effective search as compared to Yahoo and AOL around 1999. It has become absolute garbage.

• 
  Luke West (@lukewestbooks) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ShiningArowsR17 @AirlockOpen Same. Never had an AOL account.

• 
  BIG GAME (@flugamejames) reported 12 minutes ago

  this **** is just an aol chat room.

• 
  Jessica Rabbit (@Iam_Beyondit) reported 14 minutes ago

  @il_virtuoso You weren't old enough to be having no damn AOL! Lol Why you have an email during the dial up era? Lol

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 17 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

• 
  CathyNotToday2 🌿 (@Cathy2NotToday) reported 20 minutes ago

  Uh oh … this is even BEFORE his massive Data Center hauls 💰 CHARACTER should matter to voters , not what letter is next to their name The Trades Byron Donalds Didn't Want You to See Byron Donalds spent years on television lecturing Congress about insider trading. Then the record caught up with him. Between 2022 and 2023, Donalds and his spouse made over 100 stock trades valued up to $1.6 million without filing the periodic transaction reports required by the STOCK Act. Campaign Legal CenterCampaign Legal Center The number, precisely, was at least 108 trades in dozens of companies, ranging in total value from $108,108 to $1,620,000. Campaign Legal Center HE DIDN'T DISCLOSE THEM IN REAL TIME. The trades only surfaced in annual filings submitted in August 2023 and August 2024 — more than a year after most of the transactions occurred. That delay isn't a technicality. The STOCK Act exists so voters can watch for conflicts of interest as they happen, not a year later. And the timing here raises real questions. Donalds sits on the House Financial Services Committee, and some of his trades were in companies that committee oversees, including Elevance Health and JPMorgan Chase. In September 2024, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a formal ethics complaint asking the Office of Congressional Ethics to investigate. CLC argued that because Donalds understood the STOCK Act's requirements better than most lawmakers, there's reason to believe the omissions weren't accidental. AOL The irony is hard to miss. This is a man who once appeared on television demanding sanctions against members of Congress who violate the STOCK Act. Florida Bulldog He said the House "has to get real." Now he's the case study. As of mid-2026, Donalds has said publicly that he doesn't personally trade securities but uses a broker with trading authority, and that he supports banning direct trading by members while allowing third-party financial professionals to trade on their behalf. (PolitiFact That's a defense worth weighing on its merits. It doesn't erase the 108 undisclosed trades or the year-long gap in reporting. Voters can decide what that pattern says about judgment — but they deserve to know it happened before they decide who leads the state next. 🎇We have a real chance to shift our leadership expectations. Stop settling for party and vote AGENDA and CHARACTER Vote @davidjollyfl @GwenGraham Note: this uses information and reporting from the Campaign Legal Center, Florida Bulldog, and PolitiFact —

• 
  Robyn O'Donnell (@RobynDODonnell) reported 21 minutes ago

  @FOXLA All I can say is Paramount+ sucks. I tried it twice. It is a technical glitch disaster on my TV. It just loads like it was AOL dial-up! Give me a break!