AOL outages and service status in Jeffersonville, Indiana

Problems in the last 24 hours in Jeffersonville, Indiana

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Jeffersonville, Indiana and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Jeffersonville, Indiana

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Jeffersonville and nearby locations:

• 
  Eric Zollman 🆘️ (@DeusExRequiem) reported 21 minutes ago from New Albany, Indiana

  I have ATT fiber in my house and its the slowest most garbage internet service I've had. Goes as slow as AOL. I miss @GetSpectrum

• 
  Casey Crawley™ (@CreepingItRe4L) reported 31 minutes ago from Jeffersonville, Indiana

  @clawson2987 @AOL Damn, i did.

• 
  Kevin Gibson (@kgramone) reported 46 minutes ago from Louisville, Kentucky

  @clozilly @LouClinicEscort Wouldn't it be funny if the info was burned on old AOL install CDs? No? Never mind.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lawrence L. Wood (@LLawrence74685) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Read a tech history of AOL and you might get a historical education of the internet service business and it's startup.

• 
  Alley AL (@BackAlleyAL_) reported 7 minutes ago

  @SouthernGo40189 @markasual5 @BadQualityMemes No it means you never used a computer pre google as in AOL

• 
  Jack Hammer (@jack_hammer22) reported 8 minutes ago

  @TaraServatius John is a rino *** just like the rest. Its one big **** show the senate. Mitch AOL. Maxine AOL. Thune and the rest traitors.

• 
  Crowsky📎 (@Crowsky13) reported 9 minutes ago

  @IzzatStatus The subscription model has been coming for years tbh. Remember how AOL stayed in business simply because so many people never canceled? Combined with the full erosion of ToS contracts, consumers are getting the shaft big time

• 
  lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported 9 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest

• 
  Gigi 🇵🇷 (@gigi_rivera71) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BBfan4life4sure @Iwanthatveto They didn’t have HOH comps to save them or POV. They had to complete task and had to budget for food. They each had to vote 2 people that they wanted to leave each week. The people with the most votes I believe two or three were left for the viewers to decide banishment by calling an 800 number and voting. Live feeds were on AOL which was horrible. And they had live animals in the BY.

• 
  StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported 9 minutes ago

  @kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.

• 
  Poow | Open Commission on Vgen (@Poowploof) reported 11 minutes ago

  Alucard had astigmatism before being infected by a demon (why he qualified to AoL? Well, Tigreal.) Apparently when he was younger, he not only had bad eyesight but also bad taste in men.

• 
  Fred Johnston (@JohnstonFredJ) reported 15 minutes ago

  @getwhatugive @LynAldenContact You’re collapsing the product and the protocol. BlackRock/MSTR make money if demand for bitcoin rises. Demand rises when access gets easier: brokerage accounts, 401ks, treasuries, Lightning, hardware wallets. Shrinking the buyer pool would hurt their bags. That’s the opposite incentive of “reduce access.” Early internet had AOL too. Walled gardens expanded the user base first. The open network still won because the protocol wasn’t owned by AOL.Same here. An ETF is not a modem ban. Anyone can still run a node, hold keys, and send sats. Institutions can offer a wrapper. They cannot revoke the chain. “Gemini agrees” is not an argument. The music-sharing analogy also fails: Napster was illegal and centralized. Bitcoin settles on a public ledger. You don’t sterilize that by listing a ticker.

• 
  Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.