AOL outages and service status in Kansas City, Kansas

Problems in the last 24 hours in Kansas City, Kansas

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kansas City, Kansas and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Kansas City, Kansas

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Kansas City and nearby locations:

• 
  Michael Mall (@mmallkc) reported 15 minutes ago from Kansas City, Kansas

  @Angold1966 @RKezins @Ojeda4America ...in order to damage Biden's reputation prior to the 2022 election. 8. Was mostly AOL on his incompetent response to a pandemic that has killed over 1 million Americans and several million world wide. a. Requiring states to address the issue on their own intead of providing...

• 
  Richard Barber (@Richard73060201) reported 30 minutes ago from Kansas City, Kansas

  @joncoopertweets @AOL What an idiot! Get him out of The White House.

• 
  Hutch Hutchinson (@hutchtch87) reported 58 minutes ago from Kansas City, Kansas

  Give it up #NFLNetwork - awful broadcast. Commentators 👎 and the same 4 commercials in each break. For those savvy people, they blocked the ability to direct the sound to the HonePod. Short sightedness is what ended Blockbuster and AOL. Time to put the viewers first #nfl

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  KingStudebaker (@KingStudebaker) reported 3 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Lol. People use this ap??? Let me get my old AOL account and login

• 
  Sakshi (@nt570) reported 9 minutes ago

  @ANI bad adverstisement for AOL

• 
  Annie @ Redwood Press (@Redwood_Press) reported 17 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ I got 18. Never had a Walkman or AOL.

• 
  Gary Eppenbaugh (@garyeppenbaugh) reported 18 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Holy hell, we thought you went to go hang out with Ask Jeeves for the weekend at his mountain cabin with Napster, Netscape, and AOL Instant Messenger

• 
  Mohit (@codewith55) reported 21 minutes ago

  Which email service would you choose as your primary email in 2026? Outlook Proton Mail Gmail Yahoo Mail iCloud Mail Zoho Mail AOL Mail

• 
  Davidvinc (@TheDavidVinc) reported 22 minutes ago

  I remember when I was young and my mother would take me to the mall. I would bring a small notepad and pencil, then sit in Walden Books and write down things I had to do where I was stuck when I couldn't afford the guide. And as far as Gamefaqs is concerned, I don't think I knew that existed till like 1998 or 1999. It's not like we had social media to talk about different websites, I had to search using AOL keywords.

• 
  MewMew Monke💛🍌| Monkey Vtuber (@MewMew_Monke) reported 24 minutes ago

  @YomiQuinnley WTF IS AN AOL???

• 
  Davo (@RegisLeDavo) reported 25 minutes ago

  Need wee Phillie back down the AoL til the window shuts because I need to know what ******** is actually happening in the building

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 26 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  dorked_web (@dorked_web) reported 27 minutes ago

  It really is true that if you go on here just to hang out and have fun with people all over the internet, it's almost possible to get a little taste of like early-2000's forums and stuff (or for some, maybe AOL chat rooms). I long for the day I can nuke my other account.