AOL outages and service status in Crestwood, Kentucky

Problems in the last 24 hours in Crestwood, Kentucky

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Crestwood, Kentucky and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Crestwood, Kentucky

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Crestwood and nearby locations:

• 
  matt moore (@tombetom) reported 41 minutes ago from La Grange, Kentucky

  AT&T home internet is dog shit I might as well have aol dialup still

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 2 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

• 
  Thomas🇺🇲 #BlueCrew (@HawkeyeTownsend) reported 4 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 I never had AOL only 19

• 
  MARMOT (@Web3Marmot) reported 5 minutes ago

  🚨 THIS IS HOW THE CRASH BEGINS The S&P 500 is tracing the exact same peak pattern as 2007. Back then, Blackstone went public at the absolute top of that cycle. The financial crisis followed months later. Now SpaceX just did the exact same thing. Here's how it works: When a mega-company goes public, it vacuums up massive amounts of capital. Investors dump other assets just to buy the "IPO of the decade." This drains liquidity from the rest of the market and starves the bull run of its fuel. That's what's happening right now. The Magnificent 7 lost $2.3 trillion in a single month. Microsoft: -20% Nvidia: -13% Apple: -8% The playbook never changes. 2000: AOL & Time Warner merged → dot-com bubble peak. 2011: Glencore went public → commodities supercycle top. 2021: Coinbase IPO'd → crypto cycle peak. This always ends the same way. But now it's even worse because Anthropic and OpenAI are waiting in line. Smart money never sells at the bottom. They sell to you at the peak. These mega IPOs aren't a sign of market strength. They're the exit doors slamming shut. You've been warned. Remember, I accurately predicted the recent $82K BTC bull trap and nailed the $111K top in October. My next call will be even more important. Turn on notifications. Most people will follow me too late.

• 
  Jamie (@jamielyn0127) reported 10 minutes ago

  @zedamex @el_mesa @RinoTheBouncer That still requires players to have a strong enough internet connection to do these things. What do you propose people in rural areas with poor or zero home internet access should do? AOL shut down back in Sept 2025 which was one of the few options rural families rely on.

• 
  Gonz (@GonzoBeyondo) reported 11 minutes ago

  @walipini The first round of destruction was the free AOL trial CDs. Then came smartphones. It looks like AI will be putting the final nail in the coffin by serving as an uncapped sewer, spewing **** all over the place.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 13 minutes ago

  @dharmjack01 rankings based on current data: ARB 88/100 - robinhood integration driving real volume, $10m annual licensing revenue locked in, ecosystem actually shipping ENA 85/100 - 70% of robinhood deposits, morpho integration at $90m collateral, USDe carry trade dominating new chains ZRO 75/100 - 86% market share in crosschain messaging but mantle migrated $2.5b to chainlink ccip, volume down 20% q2 $0G 70/100 - alibaba cloud partnership for onchain AI, 100k agents deployed, but market maker concerns from may still hanging around LIT 68/100 - token burns replacing buybacks, robinhood perp dex partnership, but that $2m liquidity incident shows thin orderbooks SXT 60/100 - proof of SQL is legitimately novel, microsoft AI integration live, but holder count dropped 13.9% and unlock pressure cleared AOL 45/100 - functional solana launchpad with staking, down 92% from ath on $1m mcap, niche play at best

• 
  AcePorkins (@AcePorkins) reported 14 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 19, somehow never had an AOL address. I think I skipped straight to yahoo or Hotmail.

• 
  Bazz (@CbazzThaGreat) reported 15 minutes ago

  @RE420 Listen. AOL chat rooms on dial up internet. My tribe. I’ve worked in the school system here with middle schoolers no less. I’ve seen it first hand, had to do investigations on kids phones because of **** they did and Said on social media. It’s **** naw for me.

• 
  f_marzotto (@f_marzotto) reported 15 minutes ago

  $BSP is a masterpiece. Just not of innovation. Working in Big Tech, you get used to seeing what actual scale and innovation look like. So watching Italy crown Bending Spoons as its great tech champion - a team that buys beloved, declining brands like AOL, Evernote, WeTransfer, and Meetup to "revive" them - has been fascinating. Their $18 billion IPO is largely deserved: they are exceptional operators. They make neglected software fast and profitable. The machine works. But there are two things you can do to a fading product. You can make it modern and profitable again - or you can make it win again, attracting new people who genuinely love it. Bending Spoons does the first brilliantly. The second, almost never. Their own SEC prospectus reveals the trick. Organic growth was 13% last year, and just 6% last quarter. Net revenue retention is 94%, meaning each cohort of users is worth less a year later, even after aggressive price hikes. This isn't a base being won back; it's a base leaking quietly, taxed harder on the way out. This is exactly why comparing them to Big Tech is so revealing. Picture $META putting WhatsApp or Instagram behind a paywall tomorrow. There would be a global uproar. Meta has the most locked-in audience on Earth, yet they refuse to charge them. Why? Because they are still chasing growth. Bending Spoons charges its captive audiences precisely because it has no growth left to protect. They execute the exact playbook that would make Meta a supervillain, but on smaller apps with weaker exits - and we call it genius. The reviled villain treats its users better than the celebrated innovator. A true maker earns its price by building something genuinely better; you pay because you want to stay. Bending Spoons didn't build these products; braver people did. They buy them when they are loved and hard to quit, and turn them into extraction machines. They are professional converters of makers into takers. Charging people because they want to stay makes everyone richer. Charging them because they can't leave just moves money from users to shareholders. One is a gain for the world. The other is a transfer. And every switch they flip is one more bill on people already drowning in subscriptions, asked to pay again for what they once had free. Of course, the business works. Rent extraction is the safest business on earth: low risk, fast payback, nothing to invent. But compare that to actual innovation. Whatever you think of Elon Musk, he took real risk on things that didn't exist yet: Tesla forced open the EV industry, SpaceX made rockets reusable, and each time the rest of the world had to follow. He earned his success by growing the pie; Bending Spoons pours the same ingenuity into nag screens and cancellation mazes, carving up a pie someone else baked. Let's not call a toll booth a cathedral. Celebrate rent-collection as innovation, and we teach our best makers to optimize the past instead of building the future.

• 
  Cat6_whiteplate (@CA_mk2) reported 18 minutes ago

  @LucifersTweetz Aol? You got dial up as torture down there?