AOL outages and service status in Prospect, Kentucky

Problems in the last 24 hours in Prospect, Kentucky

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Prospect, Kentucky and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Prospect, Kentucky

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Prospect and nearby locations:

• 
  Casey Crawley™ (@CreepingItRe4L) reported 39 minutes ago from Jeffersonville, Indiana

  @clawson2987 @AOL Damn, i did.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Richard Cohen (@rjcohen75) reported 6 minutes ago

  @james_spir19274 19. Never heard of an AOL address.

• 
  Ara G. Gelenian (@BPVideoGroup) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18. 19 if the "film camera" is a still camera not a motion picture camera. Never had an AOL address or waterbed.

• 
  The Psycho Analyst (@TheRealBirnbaum) reported 8 minutes ago

  The horde is following each other off a cliff believing Madam Media’s hysterics over open source. I believe either Anthropic, OpenAI, or a newer competitor—or all three—will be ten times bigger than they are today within the next text years. The media is giving emotional reasons for the impending doom of frontier models. They’re spending more than they make isn’t evidence when every revolutionary tech giant did the same. That they’re doing it at unprecedented scale is a stronger version of the same point. Anthropic has penetrated about 1% of the enterprise market. Use cases are in their infancy. LLMs are the AOL of the AI age. We haven’t even gotten robotics and healthcare and everything else. The hyperscalers are only starting to show the analysts how slavishly emotional they are. The economists pointing to history books have never been right. They were the same group claiming we’d hit a new all time high plateau in 1999. History never repeats and rhymes only when you tilt your head and squint. In reality, reality is a complex adaptive system that requires constant analysis and logical assessment. There are no shortcuts, and you should never trust the hacks who use them. $AMZN $GOOGL

• 
  K (@K53651110) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19…. I never did AOL

• 
  Azure (@azuritess) reported 13 minutes ago

  @svnryn_ runyu swept him to the top popularity at that time, and because his data topped ML/FL, as support actor. He was cursed badly, called the famous ten days of slaying the dragon incident, he was even banned and dropped by the AOL official/producer. +

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 14 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  nathanistic (@nathanistic) reported 14 minutes ago

  Koalas already sleep 18 to 20 hours a day just to survive on a diet of tough, low-calorie eucalyptus leaves, so during breeding season, when males travel across territory and call repeatedly searching for a mate, that search comes at a real energy cost. If success doesn't come quickly, researchers have observed both males and females essentially cut their losses, males quiet down and stop searching, while females retreat to familiar trees and reduce movement to lower stress and conserve energy. It's less about giving up out of frustration and more about biology forcing a hard limit, koalas run on such a strict energy budget that continuing to search nonstop could actually drain the reserves they need just to stay healthy for the next breeding opportunity. Later in the season, once energy reserves stabilize, males often pick the calls back up again. There's something oddly relatable about an animal whose entire strategy for disappointment is just going back to sleep. Does knowing the actual biology behind it make the koala nap life even funnier, or does it take away from the joke? Sources: AOL, WWF, A-Z Animals

• 
  Conspiracy Theorist (@ConspiracyTheo1) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh I never used AOL, so i used 19 of 20.

• 
  Beaubien (@el_beaubien) reported 19 minutes ago

  @PhilosophyOnX Not to punish ... rather to ignore. That's a lifetime observation. Post an argument ... get an argument. Post an actual functional idea ... you get crickets. In general, people have no ideas of their own and so cannot process ideas generically. They have not the experience of it. I have found this to be true ... 100% of the time. Whenever anyone objects vigorously to an idea I have posted on the internet ... without a single exception in the time I've been on it (since ~1994 AOL) ... the person objecting will have no idea of their own to offer ... only invective and support for the status quo regardless of what it is.

• 
  Brian Suttmiller (@B_SuttyNY) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 for me. Never had an AOL address.