AOL outages and service status in Greenbelt, Maryland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Greenbelt, Maryland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Greenbelt, Maryland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Greenbelt, Maryland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Greenbelt and nearby locations:

• 
  George Economides (@Athens1896) reported 7 minutes ago from Riverdale Park, Maryland

  @AOL Aol should get their stories straight. Tried to lower my costs and agreed to $5 plan, but still being billed $18.95. Can't get right person to correct problem. HELP. Long time user of AOL. HELP!!! Thanks in advance.

• 
  💜🖤Blood Girl🦇Raven💜🖤 (@RAVENSBlood5220) reported 58 minutes ago from East Riverdale, Maryland

  The Invasion angle should've been the most epic moment in Wrestling. Without all the major stars from WCW, it never lived up to those expectations. Very disappointing. There also was no Twitter to explain those AOL contracts for those stars too. #RuthlessAggression

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jeff Bohren (@JeffBohren) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brockpierson If you had AOL or CompuServe, you had to connect with a modem. At some point PCs shipped with integrated modems, but yes, I rocked one of those bad boys as well.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 8 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Paul Moore (@ftlpaul8) reported 9 minutes ago

  @AOL : WARNING - If forced to upgrade to paid subscription to “reset” password, you will not be able to return to “free” plan, even if you block future charges on your credit card. They charge you anyway. Call them: you hold for an hour. Then they say they’ll fix it, but don’t!

• 
  RealNHSMedway (@real_nhs) reported 14 minutes ago

  @DailyMirror What embarrassing drivel you post on the AOL newsfeed! Non-stories, utter crap - I can only imagine what the newspaper must be like! Pathetic excuse for content.

• 
  Crowsky📎 (@Crowsky13) reported 15 minutes ago

  @IzzatStatus The subscription model has been coming for years tbh. Remember how AOL stayed in business simply because so many people never canceled? Combined with the full erosion of ToS contracts, consumers are getting the shaft big time

• 
  Nyadnar#17 (@Nyadnar17) reported 23 minutes ago

  @LitterboxComics I was a new dad trying to research way to help my wife. Been trolling the depths of the internet for fun since AOL was a thing. I was not prepared for the deprivation and inhumanity I found in online parenting forums.

• 
  DEMediaIsPropaganda -TXIconoclast Apostle (@WhoIsVendix) reported 24 minutes ago

  @dom_lucre Smart People Never Trust Media CNN Worthless since apx 2000 When Bannon Brokered Sale. Maybe better under Time Warmer but CEO gone soon after insane AOL buy I schooled older but very green Bannon on need 4 Conserv media at HBS along w Defense Free Riding & China Threat

• 
  Stefan Smith (@TheStefanSmith) reported 26 minutes ago

  My Aunt Jane has had the same AOL email address since 1997 and is using ChatGPT to help her redesign her kitchen.

• 
  Fred Johnston (@JohnstonFredJ) reported 26 minutes ago

  @getwhatugive @LynAldenContact You’re collapsing the product and the protocol. BlackRock/MSTR make money if demand for bitcoin rises. Demand rises when access gets easier: brokerage accounts, 401ks, treasuries, Lightning, hardware wallets. Shrinking the buyer pool would hurt their bags. That’s the opposite incentive of “reduce access.” Early internet had AOL too. Walled gardens expanded the user base first. The open network still won because the protocol wasn’t owned by AOL.Same here. An ETF is not a modem ban. Anyone can still run a node, hold keys, and send sats. Institutions can offer a wrapper. They cannot revoke the chain. “Gemini agrees” is not an argument. The music-sharing analogy also fails: Napster was illegal and centralized. Bitcoin settles on a public ledger. You don’t sterilize that by listing a ticker.

• 
  Big Sean Corduroy Don Jr (@universalken88) reported 33 minutes ago

  @whiteboysumer you want me to be upset? online? like interacting with a complete stranger that doesn’t know me or anything about me…could upset me? im 38 yrs old. i cant be upset by strangers online. i was in AOL chat rooms when this **** was fun. what ethics?