1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Fayetteville
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Fayetteville, North Carolina

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Fayetteville, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Fayetteville, North Carolina

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Fayetteville, North Carolina and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Fayetteville, North Carolina

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Fayetteville and nearby locations:

  • CookiePicasso
    Neeko Rouse (@CookiePicasso) reported from Fort Bragg (historical), North Carolina

    @MingleKelingle I would never lay my hands on a woman but I will psychologically dismantle her via AOL instant messenger

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • towdow3
    Robert (@towdow3) reported

    @TimoTweetss this tweet shows that you ARE that guy. I have an AOL email and i one point i hadn't checked it for ten years. I had no problem checking it. TEN YEARS.

  • davidburkus
    Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported

    WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

  • argos_trades
    Argos Trades (@argos_trades) reported

    @RetiredLifeNC @pokey_chi @Ashton_1nvests The problem is finding winners in hindsight always looks like a mistake. Imagine holding and never selling AOL.

  • zachenglish91
    Zach English (@zachenglish91) reported

    @ericbrownzzz I don't know if this was intended, but I like the linkage b/w Online America and AoL (A.rchers o.f L.oaf and America Online; an internet service from when Archers were active). AoL: Web in front. But in back of web, some chat rooms with three people in them.

  • pitawolf037
    Pops(Kevin) (@pitawolf037) reported

    @SarahSevans2000 Only 19 here. I never signed up for an aol account.

  • StupidBoomers
    Flavius Aetius (@StupidBoomers) reported

    @litteralyme0 wikipedia sucks...its dying...like AOL or Myspace

  • wildriceeater
    Kiash Matchitiwuk (@wildriceeater) reported

    @GiniferL Authorized. So it wants me to authorize it. The problem is I bought that 20 years ago with a long gone AOL account. You gotta be ******* kidding me. I paid for that music. I haven't bought many digital downloads and I sure as ****** aren't going to anymore. Apple Buzz Kill. 😑

  • TheRealBirnbaum
    The Psycho Analyst (@TheRealBirnbaum) reported

    I said it again and again and again: the current LLMs are equivalent to the dialup of dotcom era. Back then we were effectively paying a software license for AOL. Today, the idea of paying to use the Internet is absolutely absurd. My gut tells me there’s a place for the frontier models. But I don’t see it being in the hands of every consumer when the technology is essentially a commodity. I think the frontier models have a legitimate business that’s going to be much smaller than the market currently prices them at. I also see people totally misunderstand the value proposition for AI. Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic are needed to sustain the AI boom. At worst there’s an air gap. Doesn’t matter if it’s open source or not—same compute is needed. And if the models aren’t as good, then ChatGPT and Claude are needed.

  • gramsdidit
    grams de champ (@gramsdidit) reported

    @JeffJSays in 1997 i had our old clunker computer hidden in my closet with extension cord under the carpet around the bed to power so i could chat with friends on AOL dialup and play roller coaster tycoon after folks went to bed, never got caught. these kids got it easy

  • veryhotsoup
    Babe Truth (@veryhotsoup) reported

    You guys never had AOL and it shows