1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Washington
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Washington, North Carolina

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Washington, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Washington, North Carolina

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Washington, North Carolina and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Washington, North Carolina

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Washington and nearby locations:

  • macewan
    macewan (@macewan) reported from Washington, North Carolina

    @Flipboard please sell out to @AOL or @Apple. Advertisements really goof up reading articles at times. More elegant solution would rock.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • RealBlueCollarB
    Blue Collar Brandon (@RealBlueCollarB) reported

    @wongfeihungdong @DHSgov I'm not sure if its still abbreviated this way, we used to just type "s2s" for sucks to sucks. AOL and ICQ days.

  • NoMarginGuy
    Jared (@NoMarginGuy) reported

    @SinaiLawFirm Just remember.. this is the worst these AI tools will be. We are in the AOL phase of internet development.

  • JaySick78
    Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported

    @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

  • ATFirearmsTTV
    AllThingsFirearms (@ATFirearmsTTV) reported

    @BlackBeamLabs I still have one of the few remaining @aol and @netscape emails... ******* for admitting that honestly lmao

  • MatyasFulop
    matyas fulop (@MatyasFulop) reported

    @neetintel @CommunityNotes If Emergency Action Messages aren't used for emergencies what does the military use then? AOL Instant Messenger?

  • FirstDeployAI
    WhiteFlour (@FirstDeployAI) reported

    @2whazzuup My mother still has an AOL email, so no, it will never die.

  • johndillen77
    john (@johndillen77) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL email

  • BigTodd1776
    Todd AF (@BigTodd1776) reported

    @DavidShafer I thought @mapquest went out with AOL online, my bad...I do remember when cassette tape got feisty with Compact Disk for about 15 minutes, then they just went away. Bye Mapquest.

  • CanadaDry42
    ._. (@CanadaDry42) reported

    @no1eliofan For the vast vast vast majority of players, you could talk to your friends over the phone, message them over AOL, or just see them the next day at school So why write down a message onto mail, give it to a pokemon, and trade them that pokemon to send a message?

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.