AOL outages and service status in Somerdale, New Jersey
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Somerdale, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Somerdale, New Jersey
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Somerdale, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Somerdale, New Jersey
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Somerdale and nearby locations:
-
Chuck Swanson (@Chuck_Swanson) reported from Audubon, New Jersey@aolmail Tried to DM you about a problem. It won’t let me.
-
Chuck Swanson (@Chuck_Swanson) reported from Audubon, New Jersey@aolmail Please fix the doggone Verizon email app. So tired of having to do my username and password every time I use it. Like twice a day. I’ve complained for months to no avail. Fix. It.
-
Dave (Comedy) Gold (@DG_ComedyGold) reported from Hi-Nella, New JerseyWelp, looks like Comca$t internet is down... (frantically searches for AOL "free trial" CD...) @Xfinity @AOL
-
Chuck Swanson (@Chuck_Swanson) reported from Audubon, New Jersey@aolmail I’m a Verizon email customer. I get my email thru your app. Every day I have to re-enter my username and password. I’m tired of it. Pls fix it!
-
Marla Cimini (@MarlaCimini) reported from Erlton-Ellisburg, New JerseyHi @AOLSupportHelp @AOL @aolmail I’m trying to re-set my relative’s email password...can you help?
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Gregorio Naçu (@gregnacu) reported@MuseumCommodore 17 for me. Never used a TAC-2. I am too young to have seen a C64 running in a store. But I have left things like the 10-print maze running on a C64 I found in use at a daycare. I sadly missed QuantumLink. I called the 800 number once, and an AOL rep answered.
-
Reason Ate Opinions (@Scott076973722) reported@theamelia___ 19, I never bothered with AOL except to use the free discs as coasters.
-
Crowsky📎 (@Crowsky13) reported@IzzatStatus The subscription model has been coming for years tbh. Remember how AOL stayed in business simply because so many people never canceled? Combined with the full erosion of ToS contracts, consumers are getting the shaft big time
-
Art 🇺🇲⚓ (@BeerAce73) reported@MapQuest MapQuest? Is that like AOL? Stupid *****.
-
Gigi 🇵🇷 (@gigi_rivera71) reported@BBfan4life4sure @Iwanthatveto They didn’t have HOH comps to save them or POV. They had to complete task and had to budget for food. They each had to vote 2 people that they wanted to leave each week. The people with the most votes I believe two or three were left for the viewers to decide banishment by calling an 800 number and voting. Live feeds were on AOL which was horrible. And they had live animals in the BY.
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.
-
Billszmafia (@Babobooey) reported@fekdaoui @bot mine barely made it past set up before shutting me down for 7 days. "Bot credits" according to Grok. Grok Bot is is still in AOL dialup stage. Needs work and some tweaks badly. Save you money
-
DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reportedI’ve come to realize that Facebook is the AOL of social media. Horrible app developers. Probably hired them all from AOL.
-
Minh Nguyệt🌙 (@mnguyetinvests) reported@_tinatruth Steve Bartlett explained financial bubbles in one minute. The AOL–Time Warner story is a powerful reminder that HIGH VALUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS REAL VALUE. It reminded me of something I wrote on August 17 on my post 👇 A GREAT ASSET doesn’t automatically make a GREAT INVESTMENT. Pay too much, and your returns can suffer. Allocate too much capital, and one mistake can damage your entire portfolio. That’s why I believe good investing isn’t just about choosing the right asset. It’s about paying the RIGHT PRICE and sizing your position wisely. The AOL–Time Warner story didn’t teach me that lesson. It reinforced it. If you haven’t read my August 17 post yet, I think it adds another perspective to this conversation. 👇
-
Louis, Tencent Fan (@LouisaCommie) reported@IANdrewDiceClay I feel like the more interesting hypothetical would be if aol timer warner just never happened and wcw just went further into the 2000s same status quo, qoukd they eventually get a booker better then Eric and russo? I assume ny the time turner retires streaming era has started