AOL outages and service status in Toms River, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Toms River, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Toms River, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Toms River, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Toms River and nearby locations:

• 
  MR. UDOU IMADOME (@blackandmild79) reported 15 minutes ago from Toms River, New Jersey

  Someone had to dig into their AOL or hotmail to find an email from Jon Gruden from 10 years ago. Horrible situation

• 
  JP (@jaypeedee1025) reported 34 minutes ago from Berkeley Shores, New Jersey

  @EKANardini can’t believe you sold out big cat he is barstool you are a hanger on you have alienated this whole company just go away you are taking barstool down brick by brick just like you did to aol

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sarah Lee (@SarahLee9595) reported 8 minutes ago

  @garyvee Next we need to bring back MySpace, AIM, and AOL dialup. I never realized all the coding I did back then for my profile was foreshadowing how much coding would be used today 💬

• 
  Mike Lin (@mikelin1789) reported 8 minutes ago

  @dampedspring Most kids who trade 2x/3x Etfs on "AI stocks" have never heard of AOL, Netscape, WorldCom, Ciena, Sun Micro, Nokia, and more.

• 
  wolfie (@Wolfie89Wolfie) reported 11 minutes ago

  @gregjoz @Ford wtf is ford doing? they also going to use AOL for for the UI?

• 
  Sabretooth | Exchequer (@SabretoothSG) reported 12 minutes ago

  Crypto has hit a local maxima, like the internet did in 1998. How you monetize currently in crypto is to clip trading volume. The users doing volume are traders. so everything ships for traders, perps, options, CEXes, dexes, launchpads, etc... Build for traders and you get instant traction. build for anyone else and you get crickets, so the traction data says traders are the only market, and the capital follows the traction data. in 1998 every serious internet company was a portal. Yahoo, Excite, Lycos, AOL, Infoseek. the metric was traffic. Everything was built to keep the user on the page, because the user on the page was the business. Search was actively deprioritized. A good search engine sends the user away, which is negative stickiness, which made search a bad product. In 1999 Excite passed on buying Google for under a million dollars. In 2000 Yahoo hired Google to power its own search results, because search was a cost center you outsourced. We are in the portal era of crypto. The Google of crypto will not show immediate traction. Google didn't. It sent users away, made no money, and looked like a toy to every smart person grading it on 1998's metric. If you want immediate traction, the market has plenty for you. Go find the next pump fun. The next Aster. The next shiny thing traders rotate into for three weeks. The next big thing requires conviction about what crypto is for, not what does volume in the next 30 days.

• 
  Simple Mind (@simplemindqsall) reported 12 minutes ago

  @dark_coderz Stay living with mom and dad, Work for 6 months, put all the salary/pay into Amazon Intel Nvidia and Google stock as it comes available. Stay away from Netscape entirely. Buy AOL and hold it for 1-2 years then sell all. Likewise with Yahoo Beyond that, Dont sell - ever. Just let it ride Avoid the military - great experience but bad things on the near horizon

• 
  integrityIsPriceless (@marQspekt) reported 15 minutes ago

  Damn what about the aol folks? Lol

• 
  Spank (@mentaldischarge) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Lefty_Foshizzle There's some poor geezer who still uses an AOL e-mail address running around dropping cashier's checks off at Walmart to get his piece of the pie.

• 
  Vernon Foster (@VernonFost13133) reported 17 minutes ago

  @GaryCollin37052 his tariff policy. His tariffs amount to the largest U.S. tax increase as a share of GDP since 1993 (Tax Foundation) , roughly $1,500 per household in 2026 (Tax Foundation) . Trade: the Supreme Court ruled he couldn't impose tariffs under emergency powers (aol) , but he's kept

• 
  Derek H (@hderek485) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MickPuck @AOL I never really noticed when logging into my AOL emails. But I've been looking over the last few days. It's another outlet pedding crazy clickbait bollocks. It's a shame - I quite like having a slightly unusual AOL email address

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 24 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,