AOL outages and service status in Manchester Township, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Manchester Township, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Manchester Township, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Manchester Township, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Manchester Township and nearby locations:

• 
  MR. UDOU IMADOME (@blackandmild79) reported 29 minutes ago from Toms River, New Jersey

  Someone had to dig into their AOL or hotmail to find an email from Jon Gruden from 10 years ago. Horrible situation

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Agenda Apex (@AgendaApex) reported 6 minutes ago

  Oh, wonderful. Another glowing obituary for the 2010 Bitcoin faucet. Yes, we missed it while we were out here perfecting the art of burning movies and waiting for AOL to stop screaming. Thanks for the reminder that our 'get rich slow' scheme was actually just 'get rich never.' Next up: time machine crowdfunding?

• 
  Terry Bryant (@TBryant13305) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AOL It is a terrible lyric to put on a school book. If she didn't do it or approve it the woman is innocent until proven guilty. Perhaps the investigation should be on how it got there and who put it there in her name. I hope her lawyer is worth his salt.

• 
  Gundam Explained (@GundamExplained) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Shr00msy @HMBohemond This isn't exclusive to the Gundam fandom and has been a thing since BBSs and AOL. It's individual people with bad takes and those takes are just as annoying as posts claiming 'all gundam fans' are annoying. A bunch of bored people on the internet don't speak for everyone.

• 
  George (@George1oiw) reported 14 minutes ago

  @ChuckGrassley You act like you’re still on AOL and characters are limited so you use those dumb *** abbreviations. How about you shut ******** up and retire

• 
  RunningScared2 (@RScared2) reported 17 minutes ago

  @mama_gforce AOL - it was comforting to know that somewhere on the other side of the world, someone else was hearing the exact same busy signal the same time you were

• 
  Ja Rarieda (@jacobochino147) reported 18 minutes ago

  Anyone reposting this garbage on my timeline gets an instant block Aol jothurwa

• 
  Exencial Research Partners (@exencial_RP) reported 21 minutes ago

  OpenAI Is Forecasting Something That Has Never Happened in 75 Years of Market History Morgan Stanley's Mauboussin studied every 5-year sales growth run for US public companies since 1950. Nearly 19,300 firm-period observations. Fastest ever: AOL at 103% CAGR, and even that was a merger artifact with Time Warner. OpenAI's projection: $13.1bn (2025) → $284bn (2030). An 85% CAGR from a base no company that size has ever compounded from. The earlier $184bn-by-2029 forecast implied 118%. The mean 5-year nominal CAGR in the data: 6.9%, with 11.1% standard deviation. OpenAI's forecast sits 9 to 10 standard deviations out. Mauboussin's caveat is fair, base rates are dynamic and the past doesn't make it impossible. But it would be the single greatest growth achievement in the history of public markets. Price it accordingly. Base Rates of Nominal and Real 5-Year Sales Growth for Firms With $2-5 Billion in Sales, 1950-2025

• 
  ReOpenPa (@reopenpa) reported 22 minutes ago

  @dr_bouchard @mediainfluence9 @JuddLegum AI isn't a traditional bubble. AI is in its infancy - like looking at AOL and saying you'll never shop on the internet.

• 
  Star Wars Timeline (Ben) 🇷🇺🇺🇸 (@SWT_Channel) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JamesKruczek Like I said, it ain't about a **** measuring contest. That's a 12 year old's domain of debate. I always extended the olive branchi between EU books and Disney's canon books which I read for a first hand exp. to properly praise or criticise them in my reviews. All of it stopped when we all figured out their retarded tactic of slurring the fandom for Disney's financial woes and blaming "toxic male" men with feminist slogans. It's a shame because some modern SW comics were great until they started making everyone gay and introducing "the message". Either way, Disney never gave their "Canon" the chance to shine or compare to the infinitely more compelling epic scope of 40+ year EU world, second only maybe to Warhammer 40K lore. I have a hard time believing you even now, that you couldn't find a single EU novel compelling. Really? Not even one? If you hate them that's fine. Personal opinions are no chip off my shoulder. I can only speak to what I observed at my comic shop and tens of thousands of Star Wars fans I interacted with over the years, from AOL chat rooms, to Prequel fan site message boards, to NYC libraries and my film school. Love it or hate it, most of us knew it as Star Wars canon. We never threw the term around because it wasn't necessary to call spade a spade.

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 23 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.