AOL outages and service status in Manchester Township, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Manchester Township, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Manchester Township, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Manchester Township, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Manchester Township and nearby locations:

• 
  MR. UDOU IMADOME (@blackandmild79) reported 7 minutes ago from Toms River, New Jersey

  Someone had to dig into their AOL or hotmail to find an email from Jon Gruden from 10 years ago. Horrible situation

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  C (@T00tbeer) reported 10 minutes ago

  @WayneGunter8 @FrankenDjo Hahahaha oh ****. I forgot about AIM and AOL.

• 
  Poow | Open Commission on Vgen (@Poowploof) reported 11 minutes ago

  Alucard had astigmatism before being infected by a demon (why he qualified to AoL? Well, Tigreal.) Apparently when he was younger, he not only had bad eyesight but also bad taste in men.

• 
  Jack Hammer (@jack_hammer22) reported 17 minutes ago

  @TaraServatius John is a rino *** just like the rest. Its one big **** show the senate. Mitch AOL. Maxine AOL. Thune and the rest traitors.

• 
  Rock Hard & Spew Facts (@JCA_BelAir) reported 18 minutes ago

  @jamusp Yeah, but their servers are all still running Win2K Server and Bob lost the database passwords when AOL took them over That's really why they won't change it--Vivian in the Mail Room has them written down on a PostIt stuck to the backside of the plotter printer, but don't tell anyone. It's hilarious watching Bob grumble and act like he's not still looking for it every morning while he tries to make his coffee last him until lunch since they caught him using a 2nd K-cup but he only bought into one share of the employee coffee pool Bob's a douche. He also manages their social media accounts, btw. Just sayin'

• 
  Big Sean Corduroy Don Jr (@universalken88) reported 18 minutes ago

  @whiteboysumer you want me to be upset? online? like interacting with a complete stranger that doesn’t know me or anything about me…could upset me? im 38 yrs old. i cant be upset by strangers online. i was in AOL chat rooms when this **** was fun. what ethics?

• 
  Gary Eppenbaugh (@garyeppenbaugh) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Holy hell, we thought you went to go hang out with Ask Jeeves for the weekend at his mountain cabin with Napster, Netscape, and AOL Instant Messenger

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 23 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  joubalspacker (@joubalspacker) reported 24 minutes ago

  @thenarr47271717 @Bit_Faced @theswansjr Your analogy is a bit off Current Bitcoin is not 'The Internet' but more akin to the walled garden of America Online capable of serving only a select few... AOL was consumed by the wider permissionless network that served everybody... If BTC can only serve the masses via custodians it will be no different than a CBDC => It will be outcompeted by a freer money

• 
  Arman Tamzerian (@Armantamzerian) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BurnsideWasTosh He’ll be cracking down on fake Nigerian Prince emails next - special support for people using AOL and AskJeeves.

• 
  Robert (@RobertKidd0x) reported 25 minutes ago

  I'm old enough to remember the days when people said the internet would never catch on and just be a fad. Look how far we've come from dial-up and AOL. We're at a similar beginning now with AI. When change is unavoidable, you have to embrace it, if you are to survive.